Abstract
Although some technological risks can be traced back to the ancient times, it was between the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century that technical advancement and the process of industrialization posed the question of the management of the technologies and of their possible disastrous consequences. During these years there was an important change in approaching these issues: from the inevitability of disasters to the adoption of policies of prevention and risk management. This important change had as a consequence an increasing role of public institutions (national governments, agencies and authorities) in the control, prevention and emergency management of technological disasters. According to this new approach, scientists, the experts and the technicians that were required to “predict” using their special knowledge technological disasters, became central figures. The first post-war period represents an important turning point because this new and modern attitude towards technological hazards reached its full maturity. The spreading of new technologies also facilitated by the process of industrialization and the emergence of the era of mass consumptions, influenced a new discipline that, from different approaches, tried to address and resolve the various aspects of technological threats. Born in the postwar period, the disastrology and in general policies to ensure safety, found a systematic application after the Second World War. The increasing complexity of certain technologies used in industry, in the production of energy, in the transport sector and especially the potentially catastrophic consequences of technological accidents, imposed an additional effort in the field of regulation, prevention and management of emergencies. In some cases, such as the atomic energy for civilian use, an increasing role was played by national and international agencies that were created during this period. Since the 1970s but especially in the following decade, several major accidents (Three Mile Island, Seveso, Bhopal, Chernobyl, Fukushima, the environmental disasters caused by oil tankers) put forward the need for a standardization of rules and a greater international co-operation. The globalization of technological hazards at the time of the so-called “risk society” has fostered a more interdisciplinary approach to the issues of technological disasters. Moreover, the increased number of new hazardous substances and materials and the opportunities for human error inherent their use has determined an escalation of technological accidents. All this factors and the more and more unstable boundaries between natural disasters and man-made disasters has necessarily imposed growing efforts for harmonization policies at a national and an international level to ensure collective security, public health and environmental protection.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Smith and Petley (1990).
- 2.
- 3.
Perrow (1984).
- 4.
Walter (2008).
- 5.
Krejsa (1997).
- 6.
- 7.
Gerhard (1899).
- 8.
Karmis (2001).
- 9.
Smith (1872).
- 10.
Schlager (1995).
- 11.
Schlager (1994).
- 12.
Merewether and Price (1930).
- 13.
Prince (1920).
- 14.
LaPiere (1938).
- 15.
Sagan (1993).
- 16.
Hobsbawm (1994).
- 17.
George (2002).
- 18.
- 19.
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2004).
- 20.
Kates et al. (1985).
- 21.
- 22.
Silei (2011).
- 23.
Vaughan (1996).
- 24.
- 25.
Centemeri (1996).
- 26.
- 27.
Shrivastava (1987).
- 28.
Mould (2000).
- 29.
- 30.
References
Beck U (1992) The risk society: on the way to an alternative modernity. Sage, Newbury Park
Brickman R, Jasanoff S, Ilgen T (1985) Controlling chemicals: the politics of regulation in Europe and the U.S. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Cameron PD, Hancher L, Kühn W (eds) (1988) Nuclear energy law after Chernobyl. Graham & Trotman, London
Centemeri L (2006) Ritorno a Seveso. Il danno ambientale, il suo riconoscimento, la sua riparazione. Bruno Mondadori, Milano
Dowie M (1977) Pinto madness. Mother Jones, vol 2, pp 18–32
Dynes RR (1970) Organized behaviour in disaster. Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus
Fritz CE (1961) Disaster. In: Merton RK, Nisbet RA (eds) Contemporary social problems. Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York, pp 651–669
George TS (2002) Minamata: pollution and the struggle for democracy in postwar Japan. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Gerhard WP (1899) The safety of theatre audiences and the stage personnel against danger from fire and panic. British Fire Prevention Committee, London
Gioia DA (1996) Why i didn’t recognize pinto fire hazards. In: Ermann MD, Lundman RJ (eds) Corporate and governmental deviance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 139–157
Hobsbawm EJ (1994) Age of extremes. The short twentieth century, 1914-1991. Michael Joseph, London
Karmis M (2001) Mine health and safety management. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton
Kates RW (1971) Natural hazards in human ecological perspective: hypothesis and model. Econ Geogr 47:438–451
Kates RW, Hohenemser C, Kasperson JX (eds) (1985) Perilous progress: managing the hazards of technology. Westview, Boulder
Krejsa P (1997) Report on early warning for technological hazards. UN-IDNDR Secretariat, Geneva
LaPiere RT (1938) Collective behavior. McGraw-Hill, London
Lee MT (1998) The Ford Pinto case and the development of auto safety regulation, 1893-1978. Bus Econ Hist 27(2):390–401
Mclean I, Johnes M (2000) Aberfan. Government and disasters. Welsh Academic Press, Cardiff
Merewether ERA, Price CW (1930) Report on effects of asbestos dust on the lungs and dust suppression in the asbestos industry. HMSO, London
Mitchell JK (1996) The long road to recovery: community responses to industrial disasters. UN University Press, New York
Mould RF (2000) Chernobyl record: the definitive history of the Chernobyl catastrophe. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol
Nash JR (1976) Darkest hours: a narrative encyclopedia of worldwide disasters from ancient times to the present. Nelson-Hall, Chicago
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Basic Books, New York
Prince SA (1920) Catastrophe and social change. Based upon a sociological study of the Halifax disaster. Columbia University Press, New York
Quarantelli EL (1966) Organization under stress. In: Brictson RC (ed) Symposium on emergency operations. System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, pp 3–19
Reberschak M, Mattozzi I (eds) (2009) Il Vajont dopo il Vajont 1963-2000. Marsilio, Venezia
Sagan SD (1993) The limits of safety: organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Schlager N (1994) When technology fails. Significant technological disasters, accidents, and failures of the twentieth century. Gale Research, Detroit
Schlager N (1995) Breakdown. Deadly technological disasters. Visible Ink Press, Detroit
Sells DL, Wolf CP, Shelanski VB (eds) (1982) Accident at Three Mile Island: the human dimension. Westview Press, Boulder
Shrivastava P (1987) Bhopal. Anatomy of a crisis. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge
Silei G (2011) Imparare dalle catastrofi: disastri navali e incidenti petroliferi. Storia e Futuro 27:1–32
Silei G (2013) Una lezione dai disastri? Il Vajont e l’alluvione di Firenze. Storia e Futuro 33:1–15
Smith RA (1872) Air and rain. The beginnings of a chemical climatology. Longmans, Green, and Co, London
Smith K, Petley DN (1990) Environmental hazards. Assessing risk and reducing disasters. Routledge, London
Stern GM (2008) The Buffalo Creek disaster: how the survivors of one of the worst disasters in coal-mining history brought suit against the coal company… an won. Vintage Books, New York
Strobel LP (1980) Reckless homicide: Ford Pinto’s trial. And Books, South Bend
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. UN Publications, Geneva
Vaughan D (1996) The challenger launch decision. Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Walker JS (2004) Three Mile Island: a nuclear crisis in historical perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley
Walter F (2008) Catastrophes: une histoire culturelle. Seuil, Paris
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Silei, G. (2014). Technological Hazards, Disasters and Accidents. In: Agnoletti, M., Neri Serneri, S. (eds) The Basic Environmental History. Environmental History, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09180-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09180-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09179-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09180-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)