Skip to main content

Technological Hazards, Disasters and Accidents

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Basic Environmental History

Part of the book series: Environmental History ((ENVHIS,volume 4))

Abstract

Although some technological risks can be traced back to the ancient times, it was between the nineteenth and the beginning of the twentieth century that technical advancement and the process of industrialization posed the question of the management of the technologies and of their possible disastrous consequences. During these years there was an important change in approaching these issues: from the inevitability of disasters to the adoption of policies of prevention and risk management. This important change had as a consequence an increasing role of public institutions (national governments, agencies and authorities) in the control, prevention and emergency management of technological disasters. According to this new approach, scientists, the experts and the technicians that were required to “predict” using their special knowledge technological disasters, became central figures. The first post-war period represents an important turning point because this new and modern attitude towards technological hazards reached its full maturity. The spreading of new technologies also facilitated by the process of industrialization and the emergence of the era of mass consumptions, influenced a new discipline that, from different approaches, tried to address and resolve the various aspects of technological threats. Born in the postwar period, the disastrology and in general policies to ensure safety, found a systematic application after the Second World War. The increasing complexity of certain technologies used in industry, in the production of energy, in the transport sector and especially the potentially catastrophic consequences of technological accidents, imposed an additional effort in the field of regulation, prevention and management of emergencies. In some cases, such as the atomic energy for civilian use, an increasing role was played by national and international agencies that were created during this period. Since the 1970s but especially in the following decade, several major accidents (Three Mile Island, Seveso, Bhopal, Chernobyl, Fukushima, the environmental disasters caused by oil tankers) put forward the need for a standardization of rules and a greater international co-operation. The globalization of technological hazards at the time of the so-called “risk society” has fostered a more interdisciplinary approach to the issues of technological disasters. Moreover, the increased number of new hazardous substances and materials and the opportunities for human error inherent their use has determined an escalation of technological accidents. All this factors and the more and more unstable boundaries between natural disasters and man-made disasters has necessarily imposed growing efforts for harmonization policies at a national and an international level to ensure collective security, public health and environmental protection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Smith and Petley (1990).

  2. 2.

    Fritz (1961), Quarantelli (1966) and Dynes (1970).

  3. 3.

    Perrow (1984).

  4. 4.

    Walter (2008).

  5. 5.

    Krejsa (1997).

  6. 6.

    Kates (1971) and Nash (1976).

  7. 7.

    Gerhard (1899).

  8. 8.

    Karmis (2001).

  9. 9.

    Smith (1872).

  10. 10.

    Schlager (1995).

  11. 11.

    Schlager (1994).

  12. 12.

    Merewether and Price (1930).

  13. 13.

    Prince (1920).

  14. 14.

    LaPiere (1938).

  15. 15.

    Sagan (1993).

  16. 16.

    Hobsbawm (1994).

  17. 17.

    George (2002).

  18. 18.

    Reberschak and Mattozzi (2009) and Silei (2013).

  19. 19.

    United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2004).

  20. 20.

    Kates et al. (1985).

  21. 21.

    Dowie (1977), Strobel (1980), Gioia (1996) and Lee (1998).

  22. 22.

    Silei (2011).

  23. 23.

    Vaughan (1996).

  24. 24.

    Brickman et al. (1985) and Mitchell (1996).

  25. 25.

    Centemeri (1996).

  26. 26.

    Sells et al. (1982) and Walker (2004).

  27. 27.

    Shrivastava (1987).

  28. 28.

    Mould (2000).

  29. 29.

    Cameron et al. (1988) and Beck (1992).

  30. 30.

    Mclean and Johnes (2000) and Stern (2008).

References

  • Beck U (1992) The risk society: on the way to an alternative modernity. Sage, Newbury Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Brickman R, Jasanoff S, Ilgen T (1985) Controlling chemicals: the politics of regulation in Europe and the U.S. Cornell University Press, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron PD, Hancher L, Kühn W (eds) (1988) Nuclear energy law after Chernobyl. Graham & Trotman, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Centemeri L (2006) Ritorno a Seveso. Il danno ambientale, il suo riconoscimento, la sua riparazione. Bruno Mondadori, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowie M (1977) Pinto madness. Mother Jones, vol 2, pp 18–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dynes RR (1970) Organized behaviour in disaster. Disaster Research Center, Ohio State University, Columbus

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz CE (1961) Disaster. In: Merton RK, Nisbet RA (eds) Contemporary social problems. Harcourt, Brace and World Inc., New York, pp 651–669

    Google Scholar 

  • George TS (2002) Minamata: pollution and the struggle for democracy in postwar Japan. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhard WP (1899) The safety of theatre audiences and the stage personnel against danger from fire and panic. British Fire Prevention Committee, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia DA (1996) Why i didn’t recognize pinto fire hazards. In: Ermann MD, Lundman RJ (eds) Corporate and governmental deviance. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 139–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobsbawm EJ (1994) Age of extremes. The short twentieth century, 1914-1991. Michael Joseph, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Karmis M (2001) Mine health and safety management. Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Littleton

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW (1971) Natural hazards in human ecological perspective: hypothesis and model. Econ Geogr 47:438–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kates RW, Hohenemser C, Kasperson JX (eds) (1985) Perilous progress: managing the hazards of technology. Westview, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Krejsa P (1997) Report on early warning for technological hazards. UN-IDNDR Secretariat, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • LaPiere RT (1938) Collective behavior. McGraw-Hill, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lee MT (1998) The Ford Pinto case and the development of auto safety regulation, 1893-1978. Bus Econ Hist 27(2):390–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Mclean I, Johnes M (2000) Aberfan. Government and disasters. Welsh Academic Press, Cardiff

    Google Scholar 

  • Merewether ERA, Price CW (1930) Report on effects of asbestos dust on the lungs and dust suppression in the asbestos industry. HMSO, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell JK (1996) The long road to recovery: community responses to industrial disasters. UN University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mould RF (2000) Chernobyl record: the definitive history of the Chernobyl catastrophe. Institute of Physics Publishing, Bristol

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nash JR (1976) Darkest hours: a narrative encyclopedia of worldwide disasters from ancient times to the present. Nelson-Hall, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents: living with high risk technologies. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prince SA (1920) Catastrophe and social change. Based upon a sociological study of the Halifax disaster. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Quarantelli EL (1966) Organization under stress. In: Brictson RC (ed) Symposium on emergency operations. System Development Corporation, Santa Monica, pp 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Reberschak M, Mattozzi I (eds) (2009) Il Vajont dopo il Vajont 1963-2000. Marsilio, Venezia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagan SD (1993) The limits of safety: organizations, accidents, and nuclear weapons. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager N (1994) When technology fails. Significant technological disasters, accidents, and failures of the twentieth century. Gale Research, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager N (1995) Breakdown. Deadly technological disasters. Visible Ink Press, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Sells DL, Wolf CP, Shelanski VB (eds) (1982) Accident at Three Mile Island: the human dimension. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrivastava P (1987) Bhopal. Anatomy of a crisis. Ballinger Publishing Company, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Silei G (2011) Imparare dalle catastrofi: disastri navali e incidenti petroliferi. Storia e Futuro 27:1–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Silei G (2013) Una lezione dai disastri? Il Vajont e l’alluvione di Firenze. Storia e Futuro 33:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith RA (1872) Air and rain. The beginnings of a chemical climatology. Longmans, Green, and Co, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith K, Petley DN (1990) Environmental hazards. Assessing risk and reducing disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern GM (2008) The Buffalo Creek disaster: how the survivors of one of the worst disasters in coal-mining history brought suit against the coal company… an won. Vintage Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Strobel LP (1980) Reckless homicide: Ford Pinto’s trial. And Books, South Bend

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) (2004) Living with risk: a global review of disaster reduction initiatives. UN Publications, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan D (1996) The challenger launch decision. Risky technology, culture, and deviance at NASA. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker JS (2004) Three Mile Island: a nuclear crisis in historical perspective. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter F (2008) Catastrophes: une histoire culturelle. Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Silei .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Silei, G. (2014). Technological Hazards, Disasters and Accidents. In: Agnoletti, M., Neri Serneri, S. (eds) The Basic Environmental History. Environmental History, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09180-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics