Key Issues in the Study of State Politics in India

Chapter

Abstract

Analysing the interconnections between politics and development in South Asia, this chapter argues that since 1989 power has been decentralised—away from the national level—and at the same time centralised within numerous federal states. A categorization of Indian states regarding their concentration of power is developed and the rise in abuses of power by various Chief Ministers is analysed. Taking a Machiavellian perspective I will addresses the question whether Chief Ministers draw on ‘clientelism’, populism, or ‘post-clientelism’? It will be argued that due to the long-term disadvantages of clientelism and populism, the increase in state revenues led to a proliferation of ‘post-clientelist’ programmes. Additional policy puzzles will be examined such as: do Chief Ministers choose to nurture, distract (through opportunities for enrichment), marginalise or occasionally cut down their subordinates? How and to what extent do Chief Ministers indulge in corruption (for themselves, their parties or in turning a blind eye)? How do Chief Ministers ‘manage’ national leaders?

Bibliography

  1. Human Rights Watch. (1995). Playing the ‘communal card’. Communal violence and human rights. New York: HRW.Google Scholar
  2. Kapoor, C. (2010, November 29). NDA’s Nitish brand. The Indian Express. http://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/ndas-nitish-brand/
  3. Manor, J. (1994). Political Regeneration in India. In A. Nandy & D. L. Sheth (Eds.), The multiverse of democracy. Essays in honor of Rajni Kothari (pp. 230–241). New Delhi: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Manor, J. (2005). In part a myth. The BJP ’s organisational strength. In K. Adeney & L. Saez (Eds.), Coalition politics and Hindu nationalism (pp. 55–74). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Manor, J. (2010). Local government. In N. G. Jayal & P. B. Mehta (Eds.), The Oxford companion to politics in India (pp. 61–79). Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Manor, J. (2011, March 26). The trouble with Yeddyurappa. Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 16–19.Google Scholar
  7. Melo, M., Ng’ethe, N., & Manor, J. (2012). Against the odds. Politicians, institutions and the struggle against poverty. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Mitra, S. K., & Phoolka, H. S. (2007). When a tree shook Delhi. The 1984 carnage and its aftermath. New Dehli: Roli Books.Google Scholar
  9. Sardesai, R. (1993). The great betrayal. In D. Padgaonkar (Ed.), When Bombay burned (pp. 198–201). New Delhi: UBS Publishers.Google Scholar
  10. Suraiya, J. (2010, November 30). Bihar —All eej swell. The Times of India. http://blogs.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/jugglebandhi/entry/bihar-all-eej-swell.
  11. Wilkinson, S. I. (2004). Votes and violence. Electoral competition and ethnic riots in India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Commonwealth Studies, School of Advanced StudyUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations