Advertisement

Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Proximal Humerus Fractures

  • Lynn A. CrosbyEmail author
  • Toby Anderton
Chapter

Abstract

Displaced fractures involving the proximal humerus in the elderly population may be difficult to treat with standard methods available. Percutaneous pinning, Open Reduction, and Internal Fixation may not be sufficient secondary to the bone quality. Hemiarthroplasty in this age group has been only moderately successful mostly secondary to underlying rotator cuff problems or failure of the tuberosities to heal. Reverse Total Shoulder replacement has become a common treatment option in the elderly age group with either weakened bone quality or underlying rotator cuff dysfunction. Early outcome studies have revealed a better functional result and better pain relief than hemiarthroplasty in the elderly population with similar complication rates reported.

Keywords

Rotator Cuff Rotator Cuff Tear Shoulder Arthroplasty Great Tuberosity Proximal Humeral Fracture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Lugli T. Artificial joint by Pean (1893): the facts of unexceptional intervention and the prosthetic method. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1978;133(2):15–218.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Banks MJ, Emory RJH. Pioneers of shoulder replacement: Themistocles Gluck and Jule Emile Pean. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995;4(4):259–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Gross RM. History of total shoulder arthroplasty. In: Crosby LA, editor. Total shoulder arthroplasty. 1st ed. Rosemont, IL: AAOS; 2000. p. 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Neer II CS. Replacement arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1974;56(1):1–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:524–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Simovitch RW, Zumstein MA, Lohri E, Helmy N, Gerber C. Predictors of scapular notching in patients managed with the Delta III reverse total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:588–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grammont P, Trouilloud P, Laffay JP, Deries X. Concept study and realization of a new total shoulder prosthesis [French]. Rhumatologie. 1987;39:407–18.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chalmers PN, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for acute proximal humeral fracture: comparison to open reduction-internal fixation and hemiarthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2013.07.044.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lanting B, MacDermid J, Drosdowech D, Faber KJ. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008;17(1):42–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kim SH, Szabo RM, Marder RA. Epidemiology of humerus fractures in the United States: nationwide emergency department sample, 2008. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(3):407–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallinet D, Clappaz P, Garbuio P, Tropet Y, Obert L. Three or four parts complex proximal humerus fractures: hemiarthroplasty versus reverse prosthesis: a comparative study of 40 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009;95:48–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fractures. I. Classification and evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1077–89.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Neer II CS. Displaced proximal humerus fractures II. Treatment of three-part and four-part displacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1970;52(6):1090–103.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lehman C, Cuomo F, Kummer FJ, Zuckerman JD. The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1995;54(1):30–1.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Namdari S, et al. Comparison of hemiarthroplasty and reverse arthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1701–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gerber C, Pennington D, Nyffeler R. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2009;17:284–95.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Crane JK, Hohman DW, Nodzo SR, Duquin TR. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Propionibacterium acnes isolates from shoulder surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013;57(7):3424–6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00463-13. Epub 2013 Apr.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Molé D, Favard L. Excentered scapulohumeral osteoarthritis [French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. 2007;93(6 Suppl):37–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hansen ML, Otis JC, Johnson JS, Cordasco FA, Craig EV, Warren RF. Biomechanics of massive rotator cuff tears: implications for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):316–25.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iannotti JP, Gabriel JP, Schneck SL, et al. The normal glenohumeral relationships. An anatomical study of one hundred and forty shoulders. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1992;74:491–500.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Greiner SH, Diederichs G, Kroning I, Scheibel M, Perka C. Tuberosity position correlates with fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff after hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2009;18(3):431–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, Walch G, Coste JS, Male D. Tuberosity, malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2002;11(5):401–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gallinet D, Adam A, Gasse N, Rochet S, Obert L. Improvement in shoulder rotation in complex shoulder fractures treated by reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2013;22(1):38–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Guery J, Favard L, Sirveaux F, Oudet D, Mole D, Walch G. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty survivorship analysis of eighty replacements followed for five to ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(8):1742–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Medical College of GeorgiaGeorgia Regent’s UniversityAugustaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryGeorgia Regents Medical CenterAugustaUSA

Personalised recommendations