Advertisement

Negotiation and Assessment as Tools for Tailoring Anatomy Courses to Allied Health Programs

  • Lawrence J. RizzoloEmail author
  • William B. Stewart
  • Alexandria Garino
  • Linda H. Pellico
Chapter

Abstract

Every healthcare discipline, from paramedics to physicians, has its own requirements for anatomical knowledge. Nonetheless, there is little standardization for what an anatomy course should provide. In this chapter, we discuss our experience with graduate nurses, physician assistants, and medical students. Rather than dwell on our solution to questions of what to teach and how to teach it, we discuss how we researched the questions and negotiated with stakeholders in our educational setting, so that you might develop the solutions that work best at your institution. By identifying and assessing the needs of all who have a stake in your course, you can devise the course goals and assessments that will convince stakeholders that your course is successful. Skillful negotiations and assessments will guide the development of your course through its early years and insure it integrates with your institution’s educational programs.

Keywords

Learning Style Physician Assistant Summative Assessment Advance Practice Register Nurse Extended Match Question 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    ARC-PA. Accreditation Standards for Physician Assistant Education. 4th ed. Johns Creek, GA: Accreditation Review Commission on Education for the Physician Assistant, Inc.; 2012. http://www.arc-pa.org/acc_standards/
  2. 2.
    PAEA. Twenty-Fifth Annual Report on Physician Assistant Educational Programs in the United States, 2008–2009. Alexandria, VA: Physician Assistant Education Association; 2010. http://www.paeaonline.org/index.php?ht=d/sp/i/243/pid/243
  3. 3.
    AACN. Accelerated programs: the fast track to careers in nursing. Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges of Nursing; 2013. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/issue-bulletin-accelerated-programs
  4. 4.
    Larcombe J, Dick J. Who is best qualified to teach bioscience to nurses? Nurs Stand. 2003;17(51):38–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fisher R, Ury W, Patton B. Getting to yes: negotiating agreement without giving in. 3rd ed. New York: Penguin; 2011. xxix, 204 p.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heifetz RA, Linsky M. Leadership on the line: staying alive through the dangers of leading. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2002. xi, 252 p.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kegan R, Lahey LL. How the way we talk can change the way we work: seven languages for transformation. 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2001. ix, 241 p.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rizzolo L, Rando W. Using assessments to energize your innovation. Educational roundtable breakfast, American Association of Anatomists Annual Meeting, Bethesda, MD, 2010. http://www.anatomy.org/content/education-teaching-sessions
  9. 9.
    Rizzolo LJ, Rando WC, O’Brien K, Haims A, Abrahams J, Stewart WB. Design, implementation, and evaluation of an innovative anatomy course. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:109–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rizzolo LJ, Rando WC, O’Brien MK, Garino A, Stewart WB. Effectiveness of a shortened, clinically engaged anatomy course for physician assistant students. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4(2):64–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rizzolo LJ, Stewart WB, O’Brien M, Haims A, Rando W, Abrahams J, et al. Design principles for developing an efficient clinical anatomy course. Med Teach. 2006;28(2):142–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rizzolo LJ. Anatomy clinic. New Haven, CT: Yale University School of Medicine; 2013. http://www.anatomy.yalemedicine.org/
  13. 13.
    Engels P, de Gara C. Learning styles of medical students, general surgery residents, and general surgeons: implications for surgical education. BMC Med Educ. 2010;10(1):51.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Felder RM, Brent R. Understanding student differences. J Eng Educ. 2005;94(1):57–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lawrence J. Rizzolo
    • 1
    Email author
  • William B. Stewart
    • 1
  • Alexandria Garino
    • 2
  • Linda H. Pellico
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of SurgeryYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Physician Associate Program, Department of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenUSA
  3. 3.School of Nursing, Yale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations