Advertisement

Teaching Anatomical Sciences to Dental Students

  • Stephen McHanwellEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Dentistry is a surgical science and dental students as well as some other members of the dental team require foundation in relevant anatomical subjects. Students need to study gross anatomy, oral anatomy including tooth morphology, neuroanatomy, histology and embryology. Courses in dental gross anatomy inevitably focus on the anatomy of the head and neck but courses in thoracic and, to a limited extent, abdominal anatomy also need to be included along with the gross anatomy of intravenous therapy. Basic foundations in histology provide a necessary introduction to the histology of the specialised dental tissues. Similarly an introductory embryology course will be needed to inform the basis for a detailed study of pre- and postnatal development of the head and neck. Neuroanatomy is required not simply for the understanding of pain and jaw movements but of somatic sensation more generally, the neuroanatomy of the cranial nerves and cranial interior. Most dental anatomical sciences are taught in the early years of a dental programme but given the clear links with a number of clinical courses there is a requirement for much stronger vertical integration and a need to revisit, from a clinical perspective, anatomy taught in the early years. At the same time clinical exemplification when anatomy is first taught will stress to dental students the importance of what they are studying providing an important motivation to learn. This chapter will review what can be considered appropriate to teach in a dental anatomy course, the possible ways in which dental anatomy can be taught, how anatomy can be horizontally and vertically integrated into the whole programme, the resources available to support anatomy teaching and the place of embryology and neuroanatomy in a dental gross anatomy course. It concludes with some practical advice for those setting out to teach dental anatomy.

Keywords

Dental Student Dental School Interprofessional Education Neck Anatomy Tooth Morphology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A. The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:83–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahmed K, Rowland S, Patel V, Khan RS, Ashrafian H, Davies DC, Darzi A, Athanasiou T, Paraskeva PA. Is the structure of anatomy curriculum adequate for safe medical practice? Surgeon. 2010;8:318–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Collins J. Modern approaches to teaching and learning anatomy. Br Med J. 2008;337:665–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Obrez A, Briggs C, Buckman J, Goldstein LM, Lamb C, Knight WG. Teaching clinically relevant dental anatomy in the dental curriculum: description and assessment of an innovative module. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:797–803.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bogacki RE, Best A, Abbey LM. Equivalence study of a dental anatomy computer-assisted learning program. J Dent Educ. 2004;68:867–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Guttman GD. The current status of the anatomical sciences curriculum in US and Canadian dental schools. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:375–9.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guttman GD, Ma TP, MacPherson BR. Making gross anatomy relevant to dental students. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:355–8.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Macluskey M, Durham J, Bell A, Cowpe J, St Crean J, Dargue A, Dawson L, Freeman C, Jone J, McDouagh A, McHanwell S, Marley J, Myrddin L, Millsop L, Oliver R, Renton T, Taylor K, Thompson P. A national survey of UK final year students’ opinions of undergraduate oral surgery teaching. Eur J Dent Educ. 2012;16:e205–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McHanwell S, Atkinson M, Davies DC, Dyball R, Morris J, Ockleford C, Parkin I, Standring S, Whiten S, Wilton J. A core syllabus in anatomy for medical students. Adding common sense to need to know. Eur J Anat. 2007;11:S151–66.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Educational Affairs Committee, American Association of Clinical Anatomists. A clinical anatomy curriculum for the medical student of the 21st century: gross anatomy. Clin Anat. 1996;9:71–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    American Association of Dental Schools. Curricular guidelines in gross anatomy. J Dent Educ. 1981;45:236–42.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    AADS Section on Anatomical Sciences. Curriculum guidelines for gross anatomy. J Dent Educ. 1993;57:461–8.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    General Dental Council (UK). The first five years: the undergraduate dental curriculum. London: General Dental Council; 2008.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    General Dental Council (UK). Preparing for practice: dental team learning outcomes for registration. London: General Dental Council; 2012. http://www.gdc-uk.org/aboutus/education/pages/learning-outcomes.aspx
  15. 15.
    Liebgott B. Anatomical basis of dentistry. 3rd ed. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier; 2011.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Atkinson ME. Anatomy for dental students. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2013.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hiatt JL, Gartner LP. Textbook of head and neck anatomy. 4th ed. Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Berkovitz BKB, Holland GR, Moxham BJ. Oral anatomy and histology and embryology. 4th ed. Edinburgh: Mosby International; 2009.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Greenwood M, Seymour RA, Meechan JG. Textbook of human disease in dentistry. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Iacopino AM, Taft TB. Core curricula for postdoctoral dental students: recent problems, potential solutions, and a model for the future. J Dent Educ. 2007;71:1428–34.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Ajjawi R, Hyde S, Roberts C, Nisbet G. Marginalisation of dental students in a shared medical programme. Med Educ. 2009;43:238–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Last KS, Appleton J, Stevenson H. Basic science knowledge of dental students on conventional and problem-based learning (PBL) courses at Liverpool. Eur J Dent Educ. 2001;5:148–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Yiu CKY, McGrath C, Bridges S, Corbet EF, Botelho M, Dyson J, Chan LK. Graduates’ perceived preparedness for dental practice from PBL and traditional curricula. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:1270–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hattie J. Visible learning. Oxford: Routledge; 2011.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kieser J, Livingstone V, Meldrum A. Professional storytelling in clinical dental anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:84–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Redwood CJ, Townsend GC. The dead center of the dental curriculum: changing attitudes of dental students during dissection. J Dent Educ. 2011;75:1333–44.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Snelling J, Sahai A, Ellis H. Attitudes of medical and dental students to dissection. Clin Anat. 2003;16:165–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Pawlina W, Hromanik MJ, Milanese TR, Dierhising R, Viggiano TR, Carmichael S. Leadership and professionalism curriculum in the gross anatomy course. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006;35:609–14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Smith CF, Martinez-Alvarez C, McHanwell S. The context of learning anatomy, does it make a difference? J Anat. 2014;224:270–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Berkovitz B, Kirsch C, Moxham B, Alusi G, Cheesman T. 3D head and neck anatomy with special senses and basic neuroanatomy. London: Primal Pictures; 2007.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bruecker JK, MacPherson BR. Benefits from peer teaching in the dental gross anatomy laboratory. Eur J Dent Educ. 2004;8:72–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lee LMJ, Nagel RW, Gould DJ. The educational value of online mastery quizzes in a human anatomy course for first-year dental students. J Dent Educ. 2012;76:1195–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Last KS, Appleton J, Ferguson DB, Stevenson H. The value of a questionnaire in assessing the acquisition and retention of basic science knowledge by dental students. Eur J Dent Educ. 2000;4:3–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Durham J, Brettell S, Summerside C, McHanwell S. “It’s a good idea and just sort of needs a bit of fine tuning”—qualitative and quantitative evaluation of a vertically integrated virtual anatomy course for clinical undergraduates. Eur J Dent Educ. 2009;13:100–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hendricson WD. Changes in educational methodologies in predoctoral dental education: funding the perfect intersection. J Dent Educ. 2012;76:118–41.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sessle BJ, Bradley RM, Dubner R, Matthews B, Moller E. Dental neuroscience. New Dent. 1979;10:32–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Section on Anatomical Sciences of the American Association of Dental Schools. Curriculum guidelines for neuroanatomy. J Dent Educ. 1992;56:762–5.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Klueber KM. Neuroanatomy for the dentist in the twenty-first century. J Dent Educ. 2003;67:366–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Medical Sciences Education Development and School of Dental SciencesNewcastle UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations