Advertisement

Essential E-Learning and M-Learning Methods for Teaching Anatomy

  • Robert B. TreleaseEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Computer assisted e-learning has become a vital, integral part of teaching anatomy, virtually independent of type of curriculum. The rapid student adoption of personal mobile computing technology has promoted the development of online instructional resources that support more ubiquitous—learn anywhere—methods. This chapter covers practical e-learning in the context of different types of health sciences curricula and the basic methods and tools that anatomists can use to produce resources to suit various curricular models. Specific attention is given to fundamental word and image processing, presentation media, portable document and media formats, ebooks, video, Web design, virtual anatomy and other simulation methods, quizzes and self-assessment, and integrated self-learning modules. Learning management systems are presented as institutional media channels for e-learning distribution and communications, while emphasizing the importance of dedicated Web services for hosting and organizing crucial anatomy learning resources and activities. Finally, the effects of student diversity are considered in the context of e-learning effectiveness and educational research, along with perspectives for continuing e-learning research and development in an environment increasingly stressing revolutionary changes through online technologies.

Keywords

Joint Photographic Expert Group Portable Document Format Anatomy Laboratory Audience Response System Really Simple Syndication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Ruiz JG, Mintzer MJ, Leipzig RM. The impact of e-learning in medical education. Acad Med. 2006;81:207–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Walton G, Childs S, Blenkinsopp E. Using mobile technologies to give health students access to learning resources in the UK community setting. Health Info Libr J. 2005;2:51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Yahya S, Ahmad EA, Jalil KA. The definition and characteristics of ubiquitous learning: a discussion. Int J Educ Develop Inform Commun Technol. 2010;6:117–27.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Drake RL. Anatomy education in a changing medical curriculum. Anat Rec. 1998;253:28–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Drake RL, Lowrie DJ, Prewitt CM. Survey of gross anatomy, microscopic anatomy, neuroscience, and embryology courses in medical school curricula in the United States. Anat Rec. 2002;269:118–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: the winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:253–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green RA, Hughes DL. Student outcomes associated with use of asynchronous online discussion forums in gross anatomy teaching. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6:101–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reigeluth CM, Carr-Chellman AA. Instructional-design theories and models, volume iii: building a common knowledge base. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gagné RM, Wager WW, Golas K, Keller JM. Principles of instructional design. 5th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 2004.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Barab SA, Duffy T. From practice fields to communities of practice. In: Jonassen D, Land S, editors. Theoretical foundations of learning environments. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2012.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mayer RE. Applying the science of learning to medical education. Med Educ. 2010;44:543–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alexander CJ, Crescini WM, Juskewitch JE, Lachman N, Pawlina W. Assessing the integration of audience response system technology in teaching of anatomical sciences. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:160–6.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Webb TP, Simpson D, Denson S, Duthie Jr E. Gaming used as an informal instructional technique: effects on learner knowledge and satisfaction. J Surg Educ. 2012;69:330–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khalil MK, Nelson LD, Kibble JD. The use of self-learning modules to facilitate learning of basic science concepts in an integrated medical curriculum. Anat Sci Educ. 2010;3:219–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rainie L, Zickuhr K, Purcell K, Madden M, Brenner J. The rise of e-reading. 21 % of Americans have read an e-book. The increasing availability of e-content is prompting some to read more than in the past and to prefer buying books to borrowing them. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project; 2012. http://libraries.pewinternet.org/files/legacy-pdf/The%20rise%20of%20e-reading%204.5.12.pdf
  16. 16.
    DiLullo C, McGee P, Kriebel RM. Demystifying the Millennial student: a reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4:214–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaffar AA. YouTube: an emerging tool in anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:158–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Doubleday EG, O’Loughlin VD, Doubleday AF. The virtual anatomy laboratory: usability testing to improve an online learning resource for anatomy education. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4:318–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trelease RB. Toward virtual anatomy: a stereoscopic 3-D interactive multimedia computer program for cranial osteology. Clin Anat. 1996;9:269–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Trelease RB. The virtual anatomy practical: a stereoscopic 3D interactive multimedia computer examination program. Clin Anat. 1998;11:89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Trelease RB, Nieder GL, Dørup J, Hansen MS. Going virtual with QuickTime VR: new methods and standardized tools for interactive dynamic visualization of anatomical structures. Anat Rec. 2000;261:64–77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Trelease RB. Diffusion of innovations: smartphones and wireless anatomy learning resources. Anat Sci Educ. 2008;1:233–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Trelease RB, Nieder GL. Transforming clinical imaging and 3D data for virtual reality learning objects: HTML5 and mobile devices implementation. Anat Sci Educ. 2013;6(4):263–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Spitzer VM, Scherzinger AL. Virtual anatomy: an anatomist’s playground. Clin Anat. 2006;19:192–203.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Spitzer VM, Whitlock DG. The visible human dataset: the anatomical platform for human simulation. Anat Rec. 1998;253:49–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Welcome to Anatomage. 2013. http://www.anatomage.com/
  27. 27.
    Richardson A, Hazzard M, Challman SD, Morgenstein AM, Brueckner JK. A “Second Life” for gross anatomy: applications for multiuser virtual environments in teaching the anatomical sciences. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4:39–43.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
  29. 29.
    Logan JM, Thompson AJ, Marshak DW. Testing to enhance retention in human anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2011;4:243–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Welcome! – The Apache HTTP server project. 2013. http://httpd.apache.org/
  31. 31.
    Nguyen N, Nelson AJ, Wilson TD. Computer visualizations: factors that influence spatial anatomy comprehension. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:98–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    McNulty JA, Espiritu B, Halsey M, Mendez M. Personality preference influences medical student use of specific computer-aided instruction (CAI). BMC Med Educ. 2006;6:7.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    McNulty JA, Sonntag B, Sinacore JM. Evaluation of computer-aided instruction in a gross anatomy course: a six-year study. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:2–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Nieder GL, Borges NJ. An eight-year study of online lecture use in a medical gross anatomy and embryology course. Anat Sci Educ. 2012;5:311–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Nieder GL, Borges NJ, Pearson JC. Medical student use of online lectures: exam performance, learning styles, achievement motivation, gender. Med Sci Educ. 2011;21:222–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    2012 Annual Meeting – Annual Meetings – Meetings – AAMC. 2013. https://www.aamc.org/meetings/annual/2012_annual_meeting/313504/salmankhan.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pathology and Laboratory MedicineDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations