Advertisement

Evaluating Your Own Performance in a Lecture

  • John DentEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

Lectures are seldom so good that they cannot be improved; so it is often a good idea to ask ourselves when they are over, “What went well”? and “What could I do better next time”? To help us to evaluate our performance in a lecture we might choose to ask for student feedback, peer review or take time ourselves for personal reflection.

Student feedback, verbal or written, is easy to obtain and is the most commonly used method of gaining opinions on our lecture and on our style of lecturing. This may help us in our continuing professional development or may be used by others to evaluate our academic status and potential.

Peer review, while potentially threatening, can be a source of more focused critique and lead to constructive feedback, discussion and reflection. Finally, personal reflection may be stimulated and informed by either of these methods but if coupled with a personal desire for self-improvement it is the most potent force for change and personal development. Personal reflection can be aided by focusing on particular questions and seeking answers to challenges raised. Questions and checklists can steer our reflections towards new adaptations and improvements. Evaluating our own performance in a lecture can therefore be a benefit both to ourselves and our students.

References

  1. 1.
    Dent JA. Lectures. In: Dent JA, Harden RM, editors. A practical guide for medical teachers. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    McLaughlin K, Mandin H. A schematic approach to diagnosing and resolving lecturalgia. Med Educ. 2001;35:1135–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Murray HG. Does evaluation of teaching lead to improvement in teaching? Int J Acad Dev. 1997;2:8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cantillon P. ABC of learning and teaching in medicine. Teaching large groups. Br Med J. 2003;326:437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brown G, Manogue M. Refreshing learning a guide for lecturers. AMEE Medical Education Guide No. 22: Refreshing lecturing: a guide for lecturers. Med Teach. 2001;23:231–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    UCL Department of philosophy, lecture evaluation form. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/philosophy/docs/lecture-evaluation-form.pdf
  7. 7.
    Economics network. Evaluating your lecture. http:// www.economicsnetwork.ac.uk/book/export/html/470
  8. 8.
    Husbands CT. Variations in students’ evaluation of teachers’ lecturing in different course on which they lecture: a study at the London School of Economics and Political Science. Higher Educ. 1997;35:51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ramsden P. Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge; 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adshead I, White P, Stephenson A. Introducing peer observation of teaching to GP teachers: a questionnaire study. Med Teach. 2006;28:67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pendleton D, Scofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Siddiqui ZS, Jonas-Dwyer D, Carr SA. Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching. Med Teach. 2007;29:297–300.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pinsky LE, Irby DM. “If at first you don’t succeed”: using failure to improve teaching. Acad Med. 1997;72:973–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sinclair M, Rowe K, Brown G. The minute paper: a quick guide to assessing student learning. Nurs Times. 1998;2:4–5.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    University of Minnesota, Evaluating lectures. http://www.umn.edu/ohr/
  16. 16.
    McKeachie WJ. Teaching tips: a guidebook for the beginning college teacher. 9th ed. Lexington, MA: Heath; 1994.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Peel D. Peer observation as a transformatory tool? Teach High Educ. 2005;10:487–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nicoll T, Schofield S, Ibrahim M. “Getting started…” with large group teaching. In: Dent JA, Davis MH, editors. “Getting started…” a practical guide for clinical teachers. 3rd ed. Dundee: Centre for Medical Education, University of Dundee; 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)DundeeUK

Personalised recommendations