Abstract

Criticisms exist for fuzzy set theory which do not reside in classical (or “crisp”) set theory, some such issues exhibited by fuzzy set theory regard the law of excluded middle and law of contradiction. There are also additional complexities in fuzzy set theory for monotonicity, order and cardinality. Fuzzy set applications either avoid these issues, or use them to their advantage. The X-μ approach, however, attempts to solve some of these issues through analysis of inverse fuzzy membership functions. Through the inverse fuzzy membership function it is possible to computationally calculate classical set operations over an entire fuzzy membership. This paper firstly explores how the X-μ approach compares to both classical/crisp set theory and conventional fuzzy set theory, and explores how the problems regarding the laws of excluded middle and contradiction might be solved using X-μ. Finally the approach is implemented and applied to an area of big data over the world-wide-web, using movie ratings data.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Discussion: Probability theory and fuzzy logic are complementary rather than competitive. Technometrics 37(3), 271–276 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lawry, J., Martin, T.: Conditional beliefs in a bipolar framework. In: van der Gaag, L.C. (ed.) ECSQARU 2013. LNCS, vol. 7958, pp. 364–375. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goertzel, I.F., Ikl, M., Heljakka, A.: Probabilistic logic networks: A comprehensive framework for uncertain inference. Springer (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23(2), 421–427 (1968)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elkan, C., Berenji, H., Chandrasekaran, B., de Silva, C., Attikiouzel, Y., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Smets, P., Freksa, C., Garcia, O., Klir, G., Yuan, B., Mamdani, E., Pelletier, F., Ruspini, E., Turksen, B., Vadiee, N., Jamshidi, M., Wang, P.Z., Tan, S.K., Tan, S., Yager, R., Zadeh, L.: The paradoxical success of fuzzy logic. IEEE Expert 9(4), 3–49 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Laviolette, M., Seaman Jr., J.W.: The efficacy of fuzzy representations of uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 2(1), 4–15 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Gradual elements in a fuzzy set. Soft Computing 12(2), 165–175 (2008)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sánchez, D., Delgado, M., Vila, M.A., Chamorro-Martínez, J.: On a non-nested level-based representation of fuzziness. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 192, 159–175 (2012)CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Martin, T., Azvine, B.: The x-mu approach: Fuzzy quantities, fuzzy arithmetic and fuzzy association rules. In: 2013 IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computational Intelligence (FOCI), pp. 24–29 (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Martin, T.: The x-mu representation of fuzzy sets - regaining the excluded middle. In: 2013 13th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI), pp. 67–73 (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lewis, D., Martin, T.: X-mu; fuzzy association rule method. In: 2013 13th UK Workshop on Computational Intelligence (UKCI), pp. 144–150 (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Calculus of fuzzy restrictions. Electronics Research Laboratory, University of California (1975)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Agrawal, R., Imieliski, T., Swami, A.: Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. SIGMOD Rec. 22(2), 207–216 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Agrawal, R., Srikant, R. et al.: Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In: Proc. 20th Int. Conf. Very Large Data Bases, VLDB, vol. 1215, pp. 487–499 (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel J. Lewis
    • 1
  • Trevor P. Martin
    • 1
  1. 1.Intelligent Systems LaboratoryUniversity of BristolBristolUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations