Skip to main content

Non-rigid Object Segmentation Using Robust Active Shape Models

  • Conference paper
  • 921 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8563))

Abstract

Statistical shape models have been extensively used in several image analysis problems, providing accurate estimates of object boundaries. However, their performance degrades if the object of interest is surrounded by a cluttered background, and the features extracted from the image contain outliers. Under these assumptions, most deformable models fail since they are attracted towards the outliers, leading to poor shape estimates. This paper proposes a robust Active Shape Model, based on a sensor model that takes into account both valid and invalid observations. A weight (confidence degree) is assigned to each observation. All the observations contribute to the estimation of the object boundary but with different weights. The estimation process is recursively performed by the Expectation-Maximization method and the weights are updated in each iteration. The algorithm was tested in ultrasound images of the left ventricle and compared with the output of classic Active Shape Models. The proposed algorithm performs significantly better.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cootes, T.F., Taylor, C.J., Cooper, D.H., Graham, J.: Active shape models-their training and application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38–59 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cootes, T.F., Edwards, G.J., Taylor, C.J.: Active appearance models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 23(6), 681–685 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Ginneken, B., Frangi, A.F., Staal, J.J., ter Haar Romeny, B.M., Viergever, M.A.: Active shape model segmentation with optimal features. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21(8), 924–933 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wimmer, M., Stulp, K., Pietzsch, S., Radig, B.: Learning local objective functions for robust face model fitting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30(8), 1357–1370 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cristinacce, D., Cootes, T.F.: Automatic feature localisation with constrained local models. Pattern Recognition 41(10), 3054–3067 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Arbeláez, P., Maire, M., Fowlkes, C., Malik, J.: Contour detection and hierarchical image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 33(5), 898–916 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cootes, T.F., Ionita, M.C., Lindner, C., Sauer, P.: Robust and accurate shape model fitting using random forest regression voting. In: Fitzgibbon, A., Lazebnik, S., Perona, P., Sato, Y., Schmid, C. (eds.) ECCV 2012, Part VII. LNCS, vol. 7578, pp. 278–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogers, M., Graham, J.: Robust active shape model search. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 2353, pp. 517–530. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischler, M.A., Bolles, R.C.: Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM 24(6), 381–395 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Abi-Nahed, J., Jolly, M.-P., Yang, G.Z.: Robust active shape models: A robust, generic and simple automatic segmentation tool. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4191, pp. 1–8. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Chui, H., Rangarajan, A.: A new point matching algorithm for non-rigid registration. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 89(2), 114–141 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Nascimento, J.C., Marques, J.S.: Adaptive snakes using the EM algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14(11), 1678–1686 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dempster, A.P., Laird, N.M., Rubin, D.B.: Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 1–38 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Blake, A., Isard, M.: Active shape models. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Dice, L.R.: Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species. Ecology 26(3), 297–302 (1945)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santiago, C., Nascimento, J.C., Marques, J.S. (2014). Non-rigid Object Segmentation Using Robust Active Shape Models. In: Perales, F.J., Santos-Victor, J. (eds) Articulated Motion and Deformable Objects. AMDO 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8563. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08849-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08849-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08848-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08849-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics