Advertisement

State of Vocational Rehabilitation and Disability Evaluation in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions

  • Michiel F. RenemanEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW)

Abstract

This chapter comprises two parts: part A on vocational rehabilitation and part B on disability evaluation. In both parts clinical and scientific perspectives are intertwined. Practical suggestions will be given based on the evidence provided.

The focus in this chapter is on working adults of working age, with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain conditions (CMPCs) and work outcomes. Patients with acute conditions, lasting shorter than 6–12 weeks, are typically not referred to vocational rehabilitation or disability evaluation. “Nonspecific” refers to the exclusion of specific medical diagnoses for a musculoskeletal condition, such as infection, tumor, osteoporosis, ankylosing spondylitis, fracture, inflammatory process, radicular syndrome, or cauda equina syndrome. Work outcomes may be very diverse. It may refer to staying at work, modified work, temporarily or permanently working, returning to work (RTW), and a combination of these.

Keywords

Work Ability Vocational Rehabilitation Modify Work Disability Evaluation Functional Capacity Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Escorpizo R, Reneman MF, Ekholm J, Fritz J, Krupa T, Marnetoft SU, et al. A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall NAS, editors. Vocational rehabilitation – what works, for whom, and when? Report for the vocational rehabilitation Task Group. London: TSO; 2008.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Franche RL, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    de Vries HJ, Reneman MF, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Brouwer S. Factors promoting staying at work in people with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(6):443–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber-Moffett J, Kovacs F, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S192–300.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    van Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, del Real MT, Hutchinson A, et al. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. Eur Spine J. 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169–91.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Waterschoot FP, Dijkstra PU, Hollak N, de Vries HJ, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Pain. 2014;155(1):179–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Main C, Sullivan MJL, Watson PJ, editors. Pain management; practical applications of the biopsychosocial perspective in clinical and occupational settings. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier Limited; 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gardner BT, Pransky G, Shaw WS, Nha Hong Q, Loisel P. Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lambeek LC, Bosmans JE, Van Royen BJ, Van Tulder MW, Van Mechelen W, Anema JR. Effect of integrated care for sick listed patients with chronic low back pain: economic evaluation alongside a randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2010;341:c6414.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Waddell G, Burton K, Aylward M. A biopsychosocial model of sickness and disability. Guides Newslett. American Medical Association; 2008.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Werner EL, Cote P, Fullen BM, Hayden JA. Physicians’ determinants for sick-listing LBP patients: a systematic review. Clin J Pain. 2012;28(4):364–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Darlow B, Fullen BM, Dean S, Hurley DA, Baxter GD, Dowell A. The association between health care professional attitudes and beliefs and the attitudes and beliefs, clinical management, and outcomes of patients with low back pain: a systematic review. Eur J Pain. 2012;16(1):3–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nijs J, Roussel N, Paul van Wilgen C, Koke A, Smeets R. Thinking beyond muscles and joints: therapists’ and patients’ attitudes and beliefs regarding chronic musculoskeletal pain are key to applying effective treatment. Man Ther. 2013;18(2):96–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Anner J, Kunz R, Boer WD. Reporting about disability evaluation in European countries. Disabil Rehabil. 36(10):848–854.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Anner J, Schwegler U, Kunz R, Trezzini B, de Boer W. Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: what to expect and what not. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:470-2458-12-470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Escorpizo R, Stucki G. Disability evaluation, social security, and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: the time is now. J Occup Environ Med. 2013;55(6):644–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saltychev M, Kinnunen A, Laimi K. Vocational rehabilitation evaluation and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):106–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brouwer S, Dijkstra PU, Stewart RE, Goeken LN, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH. Comparing self-report, clinical examination and functional testing in the assessment of work-related limitations in patients with chronic low back pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(17):999–1005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rainville J, Pransky G, Indahl A, Mayer EK. The physician as disability advisor for patients with musculoskeletal complaints. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005;30(22):2579–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Brokaw JP, Walker WC, Cifu DX, Gardner M. Sitting and standing tolerance in patients with chronic back pain: comparison between physician prediction and covert observation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(5):837–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Groothoff JW. Inter-rater reliability in disability assessment based on a semi-structured interview report. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(24):1885–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spanjer J, Krol B, Brouwer S, Popping R, Groothoff JW, van der Klink JJ. Reliability and validity of the Disability Assessment Structured Interview (DASI): a tool for assessing functional limitations in claimants. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):33–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Soer R, van der Schans CP, Groothoff JW, Geertzen JH, Reneman MF. Towards consensus in operational definitions in functional capacity evaluation: a Delphi Survey. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(4):389–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gouttebarge V, Wind H, Kuijer PP, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. How to assess physical work-ability with functional capacity evaluation methods in a more specific and efficient way? Work. 2010;37(1):111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gross DP, Battie MC, Asante AK. Evaluation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation: less may be best. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):422–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Reesink DD, Jorritsma W, Reneman MF. Basis for a functional capacity evaluation methodology for patients with work-related neck disorders. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):436–49.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lakke SE, Soer R, Geertzen JH, Wittink H, Douma RK, van der Schans CP, et al. Construct validity of functional capacity tests in healthy workers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:180-2474-14-180.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lakke SE, Wittink H, Geertzen JH, van der Schans CP, Reneman MF. Factors that affect functional capacity in patients with musculoskeletal pain: a Delphi study among scientists, clinicians, and patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(3):446–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    van Abbema R, Lakke SE, Reneman MF, van der Schans CP, van Haastert CJ, Geertzen JH, et al. Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(4):455–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    van der Meer S, Reneman MF, Verhoeven J, van der Palen J. Relationship between self-reported disability and functional capacity in patients with Whiplash Associated Disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;36(10):848–854.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Reneman MF, Jorritsma W, Schellekens JM, Goeken LN. Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):119–29.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Brouwer S, Reneman MF, Frings-Dresen MH. Are performance-based measures predictive of work participation in patients with musculoskeletal disorders? A systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(2):109–23.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kuijer PP, Gouttebarge V, Wind H, van Duivenbooden C, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Prognostic value of self-reported work ability and performance-based lifting tests for sustainable return to work among construction workers. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(6):600–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wittink H, Rogers W, Sukiennik A, Carr DB. Physical functioning: self-report and performance measures are related but distinct. Spine. 2003;28(20):2407–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Reneman MF, Beemster TT, Edelaar MJ, van Velzen JM, van Bennekom C, Escorpizo R. Towards an ICF- and IMMPACT-based pain vocational rehabilitation core set in the Netherlands. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):576–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Rehabilitation, Department of Rehabilitation MedicineUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations