Advertisement

Vocational Rehabilitation

  • Sven-Uno MarnetoftEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to provide a picture of the importance of vocational rehabilitation (VR) in supporting sick or injured people in keeping their job or in offering them another job. Many definitions have been proposed for VR. The definition proposed by the ICF seems the most comprehensive one. One of the key components of the ICF definition is the optimisation of work participation. VR is a complex activity since it is practised in varied organisational bodies and with the involvement of various countries, which can affect those who undergo VR, how the process is conducted, and what the outcomes are. VR can be seen as a process in its own right or as identical to the return to work (RTW) process. An important component in the RTW process is the assessment stage. The ICF core sets can play an important role as assessment tools. During the assessment phase, it is important to mobilise the person’s strengths and abilities rather than focusing on limitations and weaknesses. The strengths perspective in social work is well known in the case management field through Strengths Model case management. With regard to VR rehabilitation interventions, there is some support for the idea that workplace interventions have a certain effect on RTW. It is important to make use of individuals’ remaining working capacity, which is in line with the ICF biopsychosocial approach. It is important to rehabilitate people back to work instead of providing a disability pension. The visualisation of the ICF concept on the basis of benefits and limitations shows a number of significant benefits that can be used in the VR process.

Keywords

Sickness Absence Disability Pension Vocational Rehabilitation Sickness Benefit Workplace Intervention 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Stubbs J, Deaner G. When considering vocational rehabilitation: describing and comparing the Swedish and American systems and professions. Work. 2005;24(3):239–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Holmes J. Vocational rehabilitation. Oxford: Blackwell; 2007.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Langman C. Introduction to vocational rehabilitation: policies, practices and skills. London/New York: Routledge/Taylor and Francis; 2012.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Marnetoft S. Vocational rehabilitation of unemployed sick-listed people in a Swedish rural area: an individual-level study based on social insurance data. Stockholm: Diss. Stockholm: Karolinska institutet; 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S 2010:04. Arbetslivsinriktad rehabilitering. Underlagsrapport nr 7 till den parlamentariska socialförsäkringsutredningen. Statens Offentliga Utredningar. S 2010:04. Available at: http://www.psfu.se/uploads/files/7_arbetslivsinriktad_rehabilitering.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2014.
  6. 6.
    Marnetoft S. The challenges of vocational rehabilitation in Sweden. Kuntoutus Fin J Rehabil. 2009;4:5–10.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. Sickness, disability and work: breaking the barriers; a synthesis of findings across OECD countries. Paris: OECD; 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wikström J. Management of early retirement by improvement of wellbeing at work and by vocational rehabilitation in disability. 7th Mediterranean Congress of PRM. Book of abstracts Portorož, Slovenia; 2008. p. 55.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reine I, Novo M, Hammarstrom A. Does the association between ill health and unemployment differ between young people and adults? Results from a 14-year follow-up study with a focus on psychological health and smoking. Public Health. 2004;118(5):337–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stankunas M, Kalediene R, Starkuviene S, Kapustinskiene V. Duration of unemployment and depression: a cross-sectional survey in Lithuania. BMC Public Health. 2006;6:174.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roelfs DJ, Shor E, Davidson KW, Schwartz JE. Losing life and livelihood: a systematic review and meta-analysis of unemployment and all-cause mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2011;72(6):840–54.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Carlier BE, Schuring M, Lotters FJB, Bakker B, Borgers N, Burdorf A. The influence of re-employment on quality of life and self-rated health, a longitudinal study among unemployed persons in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:503.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Selander J. Unemployed sick-leavers and vocational rehabilitation: a person-level study based on a national social insurance material [thesis]. Stockholm: Karolinska institutet; 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Escorpizo R, Reneman MF, Ekholm J, Fritz J, Krupa T, Marnetoft S, et al. A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Waddell G, Burton AK, Kendall NA. Vocational rehabilitation–what works, for whom, and when? (Report for the Vocational Rehabilitation Task Group); 2008.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rapp CA, Goscha RJ. The strengths model: a recovery oriented approach to mental health services. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ekberg K. Arbetslivsinriktad rehabilitering. In: Edling C, editor. Arbets- och miljömedicin: en lärobok om hälsa och miljö. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2010.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Germundsson P, Danermark B. Vocational rehabilitation, interagency collaboration and social representations. Work. 2012;42(4):507–17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Matheson L. Measuring work performance from an occupational performance perspective. In: Law MC, Baum CM, Dunn W, editors. Measuring occupational performance: supporting best practice in occupational therapy. Thorofare: Slack; 2001. p. 103–20.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glassel A, Gmunder HP, Luckenkemper M, Chan C, et al. ICF Core Set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Saltychev M, Kinnunen A, Laimi K. Vocational rehabilitation evaluation and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(1):106–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ptyushkin P, Vidmar G, Burger H, Marincek C, Escorpizo R. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in vocational rehabilitation and disability assessment in Slovenia: state of law and users’ perspective. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(2):130–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Glassel A, Finger ME, Cieza A, Treitler C, Coenen M, Escorpizo R. Vocational rehabilitation from the client’s perspective using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) as a reference. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):167–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. A qualitative study of perpetuating factors for long term sick leave and promoting factors for return to work: chronic work disabled patients in their own words. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42(6):544–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Finger ME, Glassel A, Erhart P, Gradinger F, Klipstein A, Rivier G, et al. Identification of relevant ICF categories in vocational rehabilitation: a cross sectional study evaluating the clinical perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):156–66.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Anema JR, Schellart AJM, Cassidy JD, Loisel P, Veerman TJ, van der Beek AJ. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–26.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Pransky G, Gatchel R, Linton SJ, Loisel P. Improving return to work research. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):453–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Young AE, Roessler RT, Wasiak R, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. A developmental conceptualization of return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):557–68.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leyshon R, Shaw L. Using multiple stakeholders to define a successful return to work: a concept mapping approach. Work. 2012;41(4):397–408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hunt DG, Zuberbier OA, Kozlowski AJ, Berkowitz J, Schultz IZ, Milner RA, et al. Are components of a comprehensive medical assessment predictive of work disability after an episode of occupational low back trouble? Spine. 2002;27(23):2715–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Norrmen G, Svardsudd K, Andersson DKG. How primary health care physicians make sick listing decisions: the impact of medical factors and functioning. BMC Fam Pract. 2008;9:3.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Laisne F, Lecomte C, Corbiere M. Biopsychosocial determinants of work outcomes of workers with occupational injuries receiving compensation: a prospective study. Work. 2013;44(2):117–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hillborg H, Danermark B, Svensson T. Professionals’ perceptions of and views about vocational rehabilitation for people with psychiatric disabilities. Work. 2013;44(4):471–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hees HL, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Koeter MWJ, Bultmann U, Schene AH. Towards a new definition of return-to-work outcomes in common mental disorders from a multi-stakeholder perspective. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39947.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tjulin A, Edvardsson Stiwne E, Ekberg K. Experience of the implementation of a multi-stakeholder return-to-work programme. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):409–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Stahl C, Svensson T, Petersson G, Ekberg K. A matter of trust? A study of coordination of Swedish stakeholders in return-to-work. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(3):299–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Durand M, Loisel P, Hong QN, Charpentier N. Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002;12(3):191–204.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    McFadden S, MacDonald A, Fogarty A, Le S, Merritt BK. Vocational assessment: a review of the literature from an occupation-based perspective. Scand J Occup Ther. 2010;17(1):43–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Sandqvist JL, Henriksson CM. Work functioning: a conceptual framework. Work. 2004;23(2):147–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Friesen MN, Yassi A, Cooper J. Return-to-work: the importance of human interactions and organizational structures. Work. 2001;17(1):11–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Hw Frings-Dresen MHW. What promotes sustained return to work of employees on long-term sick leave? Perspectives of vocational rehabilitation professionals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(6):481–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scovotti C, Peltier JW. Participant satisfaction with the vocational rehabilitation process: a micro perspective of relationship dimensions. Health Mark Q. 2005;22(4):3–26.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Pransky G, Shaw W, Franche R, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers–current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(11):625–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Hatchard K, Henderson J, Stanton S. Workers’ perspectives on self-directing mainstream return to work following acute mental illness: reflections on partnerships. Work. 2012;43(1):43–52.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Playford ED, Siegert R, Levack W, Freeman J. Areas of consensus and controversy about goal setting in rehabilitation: a conference report. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):334–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Jones F, Livingstone E, Hawkes L. “Getting the balance between encouragement and taking over” – reflections on using a new stroke self-management programme. Physiother Res Int. 2013;18(2):91–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Johnston V, Jull G, Sheppard DM, Ellis N. Applying principles of self-management to facilitate workers to return to or remain at work with a chronic musculoskeletal condition. Man Ther. 2013;18(4):274–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    van Beurden KM, Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, van der Beek AJ. A participatory return-to-work program for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: a process evaluation alongside a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(1):127–40.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Martin MHT, Nielsen MBD, Petersen SMA, Jakobsen LM, Rugulies R. Implementation of a coordinated and tailored return-to-work intervention for employees with mental health problems. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):427–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Egan M, Bambra C, Petticrew M, Whitehead M. Reviewing evidence on complex social interventions: appraising implementation in systematic reviews of the health effects of organisational-level workplace interventions. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2009;63(1):4–11.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Clay FJ, Fitzharris M, Kerr E, McClure RJ, Watson WL. The association of social functioning, social relationships and the receipt of compensation with time to return to work following unintentional injuries to Victorian workers. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(3):363–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Schandelmaier S, Ebrahim S, Burkhardt SCA, de Boer WEL, Zumbrunn T, Guyatt GH, et al. Return to work coordination programmes for work disability: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49760.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Capella ME, Andrew JD. The relationship between counselor job satisfaction and consumer satisfaction in vocational rehabilitation. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2004;47(4):205–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Shaw W, Hong Q, Pransky G, Loisel P. A literature review describing the role of return-to-work coordinators in trial programs and interventions designed to prevent workplace disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):2–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Pransky G, Shaw WS, Loisel P, Hong QN, Desorcy B. Development and validation of competencies for return to work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20(1):41–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Donnell CM, Lustig DC, Strauser DR. The working alliance: rehabilitation outcomes for persons with severe mental illness. J Rehabil. 2004;70(2):12–8.Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Wasiak R, Young AE, Roessler RT, McPherson KM, van Poppel MNM, Anema JR. Measuring return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(4):766–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJN. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–77.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Marnetoft SU, Selander J, Bergroth A, Ekholm J. Factors associated with successful vocational rehabilitation in a Swedish rural area. J Rehabil Med. 2001;33(2):71–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kuoppala J, Lamminpaa A. Rehabilitation and work ability: a systematic literature review. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(10):796–804.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Carroll C, Rick J, Pilgrim H, Cameron J, Hillage J. Workplace involvement improves return to work rates among employees with back pain on long-term sick leave: a systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of interventions. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(8):607–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Dekkers-Sanchez PM, Wind H, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MHW. What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians’ perspective. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012. Published online 2012/05/24. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0783-3
  63. 63.
    Franche R, Cullen K, Clarke J, Irvin E, Sinclair S, Frank J, et al. Workplace-based return-to-work interventions: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):607–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, de Vet HCW, Franche R, Schonstein E, Loisel P, et al. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):D006955.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nieuwenhuijsen K, Bultmann U, Neumeyer-Gromen A, Verhoeven AC, Verbeek JHAM, van der Feltz-Cornelis CM. Interventions to improve occupational health in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):D006237.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    de Boer AG, Taskila T, Tamminga SJ, Frings-Dresen MH, Feuerstein M, Verbeek JH. Interventions to enhance return-to-work for cancer patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(2):D007569.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Lambeek LC, van Mechelen W, Knol DL, Loisel P, Anema JR. Randomised controlled trial of integrated care to reduce disability from chronic low back pain in working and private life. BMJ. 2010;340:1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Arends I, Bruinvels DJ, Rebergen DS, Nieuwenhuijsen K, Madan I, Neumeyer-Gromen A, et al. Interventions to facilitate return to work in adults with adjustment disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;12, D006389.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Aas RW, Tuntland H, Holte KA, Roe C, Lund T, Marklund S, et al. Workplace interventions for neck pain in workers. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011(4):D008160.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Palmer KT, Harris EC, Linaker C, Barker M, Lawrence W, Cooper C, et al. Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review. Rheumatol. 2012;51(2):230–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Edlund C, Dahlgren L. The physician’s role in the vocational rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(14):727–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Campbell A, Ogden J. Why do doctors issue sick notes? An experimental questionnaire study in primary care. Fam Pract. 2006;23(1):125–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Wrapson W, Mewse AJ. Does the doctor or the patient control sick leave certification? A qualitative study interpreting patients’ interview dialogue. Fam Pract. 2011;28(2):202–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Saleebey D. Strengths perspective in social work practice, 4/e. New York: Allyn & Bacon; 2006.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Pless M, Adolfsson M. Handbok i att använda ICF och ICF-CY. Stockholm: Studentlitteratur; 2011.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Marnetoft S, Selander J. Multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation focusing on work training and case management for unemployed sick-listed people. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(4):271–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Selander J, Marnetoft S. Case management in vocational rehabilitation: a case study with promising results. Work. 2005;24(3):297–304.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Latimer E, Rabouin D. Case management for moderate-need patients and recovery: what can we learn from experimental and quasi-experimental studies? Sante Ment Que. 2011;36(1):13–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Fukui S, Goscha R, Rapp CA, Mabry A, Liddy P, Marty D. Strengths model case management fidelity scores and client outcomes. Psychiatr Serv. 2012;63(7):708–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Helander E. A critical review of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Available at: http://www.einarhelander.com/critical-review-ICF.pdf. Accessed 4 Feb 2014.
  82. 82.
    Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F, Working Group of the European Union of Medicine in Assurance and Social Security. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Reneman MF, Beemster TT, Edelaar MJA, van Velzen JM, van Bennekom C, Escorpizo R. Towards an ICF- and IMMPACT-based pain vocational rehabilitation core set in the Netherlands. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(4):576–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Caseman Rehabilitering ABÖstersundSweden

Personalised recommendations