Advertisement

Challenges and Opportunities

  • Reuben EscorpizoEmail author
  • Soren Brage
  • Debra Homa
  • Gerold Stucki
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW)

Abstract

A landmark convention by the United Nations (UN) that is likely to have the most impact on persons with disability in recent history is the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) [1]. The UN adopted the UNCRPD in 2006 with the intent to change the attitudes and approaches to persons with disability, including children. The convention is premised on providing the foundation of human rights for all persons with disability regardless of their disability; it puts persons with disability in equal position to those persons without disability in terms of rights of access to services and opportunities. This is a critical piece to current efforts by the community advocating for persons with disability whether in the realm of vocational rehabilitation or return-to-work and social security and disability evaluation. The guiding principles of the UNCRPD emphasize the rights of persons with disability with regard to nondiscrimination, full and effective participation and inclusion in society, acceptance of persons with disability as part of humanity, and having equal opportunity, and accessibility [1]. These are essential principles when assessing persons with disability and will need to be integrated in health and health-related policy by the government and organizations that provide services and care for persons with disability so as to optimize their functioning and mitigate their disability. As a major life area of participation for most individuals, work is an integral part of life and everyday living and can have serious consequences with the presence of a health condition. Hence, our ability to capture disability and work disability in particular is critical.

Keywords

Social Security Work Ability Vocational Rehabilitation Disability Evaluation Functional Capacity Evaluation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    United Nations. Convention of the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. Geneva: United Nations; 2006.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. World report on disability. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    International classification of diseases (ICD-10) [Internet]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
  5. 5.
    Escorpizo R, Kostanjsek N, Kennedy C, Nicol MM, Stucki G, Ustun TB, et al. Harmonizing WHO’s international classification of diseases (ICD) and international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF): importance and methods to link disease and functioning. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:742, 2458-13-742.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Anner J, Schwegler U, Kunz R, Trezzini B, de Boer W. Evaluation of work disability and the international classification of functioning, disability and health: What to expect and what not. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:470, 2458-12-470.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forslund MV, Roe C, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Sigurdardottir S, Andelic N. Impact of personal and environmental factors on employment outcome two years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(8):801–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Berzina G, Paanalahti M, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Exploration of some personal factors with the international classification of functioning, disability and health Core Sets for stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(7):609–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wilkie R, Blagojevic-Bucknall M, Jordan KP, Pransky G. Onset of work restriction in employed adults with lower limb joint pain: individual factors and area-level socioeconomic conditions. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):180–8.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glassel A, Gmunder HP, Luckenkemper M, Chan C, et al. ICF core set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Heiberg KE, Ekeland A, Mengshoel AM. Functional improvements desired by patients before and in the first year after total hip arthroplasty. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:243, 2474-14-243.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Coomer K, Houdmont J. Occupational health professionals’ knowledge, understanding and use of work ability. Occup Med (Lond). 2013;63(6):405–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pekkanen L, Neva MH, Kautiainen H, Dekker J, Piitulainen K, Wahlman M, et al. Disability and health-related quality of life in patients undergoing spinal fusion: a comparison with a general population sample. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:211, 2474-14-211.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meesters J, Hagel S, Klokkerud M, Stovgaard I, Bremander A, Grotle M, et al. Goal-setting in multidisciplinary team care for patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an international multi-center evaluation of the contents using the international classification of functioning, disability and health as a reference. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(9):888–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Metzelthin SF, van Rossum E, de Witte LP, Ambergen AW, Hobma SO, Sipers W, et al. Effectiveness of interdisciplinary primary care approach to reduce disability in community dwelling frail older people: cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2013;347:f5264.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Longfield K, Smith B, Gray R, Ngamkitpaiboon L, Vielot N. Putting health metrics into practice: using the disability-adjusted life year for strategic decision making. BMC Public Health. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S2, 2458-13-S2-S2. Epub 17 Jun 2013.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lu YM, Wu YY, Hsieh CL, Lin CL, Hwang SL, Cheng KI, et al. Measurement precision of the disability for back pain scale-by applying Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:119, 7525-11-119.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hubbard G, Gray NM, Ayansina D, Evans JM, Kyle RG. Case management vocational rehabilitation for women with breast cancer after surgery: a feasibility study incorporating a pilot randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2013;14:175, 6215-14-175.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Martinez-Alcala CI, Munoz M, Monguet-Fierro J. Design and customization of telemedicine systems. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:618025.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lakke SE, Soer R, Geertzen JH, Wittink H, Douma RK, van der Schans CP, et al. Construct validity of functional capacity tests in healthy workers. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:180, 2474-14-180.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schellart AJ, Zwerver F, Anema JR, Van der Beek AJ. The influence of applying insurance medicine guidelines for depression on disability assessments. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6:225, 0500-6-225.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Alford VM, Remedios LJ, Webb GR, Ewen S. The use of the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) in indigenous healthcare: a systematic literature review. Int J Equity Health. 2013;12:32, 9276-12-32.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Breeding R. The utility of proactive vocational assessment in advancing consumer empowerment. Vocat Eval Career Assess Prof J. 2006;2(2):39–56.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chan F, Keegan J, Sung C, Drout M, Pai CH, Anderson E. The world health organization ICF model as a framework for assessing vocational rehabilitation outcomes. J Rehabil Adm. 2009;33(2):91–112.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Campbell K, Bond GR, Drake RE. Who benefits from supported employment: a meta-analytic study. Schizophr Bull. 2011;37(2):370–80.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fleming AR, Del Valle R, Kim M, Leahy MJ. Best practice models of effective vocational rehabilitation service delivery in the public rehabilitation program: a review and synthesis of the empirical literature. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2012;56:146–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glassel A, Rauch A, Selb M, Emmenegger K, Luckenkemper M, Escorpizo R. A case study on the application of international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF)-based tools for vocational rehabilitation in spinal cord injury. Work. 2012;41(4):465–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Reed G, Lux J, Bufka L, Trask C, Peterson DB, Stark S, et al. Operationalizing the international classification of functioning, disability and health in clinical settings. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50(2):122–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reuben Escorpizo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Soren Brage
    • 4
  • Debra Homa
    • 5
  • Gerold Stucki
    • 2
    • 3
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation and Movement ScienceThe University of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Swiss Paraplegic ResearchNottwilSwitzerland
  3. 3.ICF Research Branch, WHO CC FIC in Germany (DIMDI)NottwilSwitzerland
  4. 4.Research UnitDirectorate for Labour and WelfareOsloNorway
  5. 5.Department of Rehabilitation and CounselingUniversity of Wisconsin-StoutMenomonieUSA
  6. 6.Department of Health Sciences and Health PolicyUniversity of LucerneLucerneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations