Advertisement

Survey of Patient-Reported Questionnaires Using the ICF as a Reference: An Illustration Using the ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation

  • Sabrina KohlerEmail author
  • Miriam Lückenkemper
  • Monika E. Finger
  • Reuben Escorpizo
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW)

Abstract

This chapter will identify and survey standard patient-reported questionnaires (PRQs) which were linked to the Brief Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Using data from a previous literature review, a database was created showing items within PRQs that have been linked to the ICF categories in the Brief ICF Core Set. The database showed a wide variety of questionnaires (N = 68) covering different health condition groups, settings, and from various health disciplines. The results of this study will assist health practitioners in vocational rehabilitation and occupational medicine in choosing, implementing, and operationalising the ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation into their daily practice using PRQs.

Keywords

Work Disability Vocational Rehabilitation Computer Adaptive Testing Vocational Rehabilitation Service Comprehensive Version 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Benítez-Silva H, Disney R, Jiménez-Martín S. Disability, capacity for work and the business cycle: an international perspective. Econ Policy. 2010;25:483–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Directorate for Employment, Labour and Social Affairs. Sickness, disability and work: keeping on track in the economic downturn (background paper). Stockholm: High-Level Forum; 2009.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hoffman C, Rice D, Sung HY. Persons with chronic conditions: their prevalence and costs. JAMA. 1996;276:1473–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lehman AF. Vocational rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1995;21:645–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Escorpizo R, Ekholm J, Gmuender HP, Cieza A, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. Developing a core set to describe functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability, and health (ICF). J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:502–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Clayton S, Barr B, Nylen L, Burström B, Thielen K, Diderichsen F, Dahl E, Whitehead M. Effectiveness of return-to-work interventions for disabled people: a systematic review of government initiatives focused on changing the behaviour of employers. Eur J Public Health. 2012;22(3):434–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Escorpizo R, Reneman MF, Ekholm J, et al. A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:126–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Patten SB, Williams JV, Wang J. Mental disorders in a population sample with musculoskeletal disorders. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:37.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wang J, Adair CE, Patten SB. Mental health and related disability among workers: a population-based study. Am J Ind Med. 2006;49:514–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millenium. Geneva: WHO Technical Report Series 919; 2003.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glassel A, et al. ICF core set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:429–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cieza A, Stucki G. The international classification of functioning disability and health: its development process and content validity. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2008;44:303–13.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Escorpizo R, Finger ME, Glassel A, Gradinger F, Luckenkemper M, Cieza A. A systematic review of functioning in vocational rehabilitation using the international classification of functioning, disability and health. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:134–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Terluin B, Van Rhenen W, Schaufeli W, De Haan M. The four-dimensional symptom questionnaire (4DSQ): measuring distress and other mental health problems in a working population. Work Stress. 2004;18:187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Turner JA, Robinson J, McCreary CP. Chronic low back pain: predicting response to nonsurgical treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1983;64:560–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    McLellan AT, Luborsky L, O’Brien CP, Woody GE. An improved diagnostic instrument for substance abuse patients: the addiction severity index. J Nerv Ment Dis. 1980;168:26–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beck AT, Steer R, Brown G. Manual for the beck depression inventory-II. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation; 1996.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bell MD. Bell Object Relations and Reality Testing Inventory (BORRTI) manual. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services; 1995.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Baecke JA, Burema J, Frijters JE. A short questionnaire for the measurement of habitual physical activity in epidemiological studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 1982;36:936–42.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Phelan M, Slade M, Thornicroft G, et al. The Camberwell assessment of need: the validity and reliability of an instrument to assess the needs of people with severe mental illness. Br J Psychiatry. 1995;167:589–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Radloff LS. The CES-D scale: a self report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Law M, Polatajko H, Pollock N, McColl MA, Carswell A, Baptiste S. Pilot testing of the Canadian occupational performance measure: clinical and measurement issues. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61:191–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The client satisfaction questionnaire. Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Eval Program Plann. 1982;5:233–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Law CK, Siu AM, Lee JL, Lee SW. Prediction of work rehabilitation placements using the Chinese work personality profile. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2006;30:120–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lovibond SH, Lovibond PF. Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales. 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation; 1995.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hildebrandt VH, Bongers PM, van Dijk FJ, Kemper HC, Dul J. Dutch musculoskeletal questionnaire: description and basic qualities. Ergonomics. 2001;44:1038–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    The EuroQol group. EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bulsara C, Styles I, Ward AM, Bulsara M. The psychometrics of developing the patient empowerment scale. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24:1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Burckhardt CS, Anderson KL. The quality of life scale (QOLS): reliability, validity, and utilization. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:60.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kiresuk TJ, Smith A, Cardillo JE, editors. Goal attainment scaling: applications, theory, and measurement. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1994.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Haldorsen EM, Indahl A, Ursin H. Patients with low back pain not returning to work. A 12-month follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1202–7; discussion 1208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Schwarzer R, Jerusalem M. Generalized self-efficacy scale. In: Weinman J, Wright S, Johnston M, editors. Measures in health psychology: a user’s portfolio, Causal and control beliefs. Windsor: NFER-NELSON; 1995. p. 35–7.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Luborsky L, Barber JP, Siqueland L, et al. The revised helping alliance questionnaire (HAq-11) psychometric properties. J Psychother Pract Res. 1996;5:260–71.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Holmes WC, Shea JA. A new HIV/AIDS-targeted quality of life (HAT-QoL) instrument: development, reliability, and validity. Med Care. 1998;36:138–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960;23:56–62.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Snyder CR, Sympson SC, Ybasco FC, Borders TF, Babyak MA, Higgins RL. Development and validation of the state Hope scale. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;70:321–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Derogatis LR, Lipman RS, Rickels K, Uhlenhuth EH, Covi L. The Hopkins symptom checklist (HSCL): a self-report symptom inventory. Behav Sci. 1974;19:1–15.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Barrera M, Irvin NS, Ramsay TB. Preliminary development of a scale of social support: studies on college students. Am J Community Psychol. 1981;9:435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Karasek R, Brisson C, Kawakami N, Houtman I, Bongers P, Amick B. The job content questionnaire (JCQ): an instrument for internationally comparative assessments of psychosocial job characteristics. J Occup Health Psychol. 1998;3:322–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Cooper CL, Rout U, Faragher B. Mental health, job satisfaction, and job stress among general practitioners. BMJ. 1989;298:366–70.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Greenough CG, Fraser RD. Assessment of outcome in patients with low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1992;17:36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the life orientation test. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1994;67:1063–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Brigance AH. Brigance diagnostic life skills inventory. North Billerica: Curriculum Associates, Inc.; 1994.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Wallston KA, Wallston BS, DeVellis R. Development of the multidimensional health locus of control (MHLC) scales. Health Educ Monogr. 1978;6:160–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Murphy GC, Young AE, Vo KM. Using locus of control to predict the return-to-work achievements of back-injured occupational rehabilitation clients. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 1995;1:83–92.Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Weiss DJ, Dawis RV, England GW, Lofquist LH. Manual for the Minnesota satisfaction questionnaire, Minnesota studies in vocational rehabilitation, vol. 22. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Industrial Relations Center; 1967.Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Main C, Wood P, Hillis S, et al. The distress and risk assessment method. A simple patient classification to identify distress and evaluate the risk of poor outcome. Spine. 1992;17:42–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy. 1980;66:271–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Linton SJ, Boersma K. Early identification of patients at risk of developing a persistent back problem: the predictive validity of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain questionnaire. Clin J Pain. 2003;19:80–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Le Pen C, Levy E, Loos F, Banzet MN, Basdevant A. “Specific” scale compared with “generic” scale: a double measurement of the quality of life in a French community sample of obese subjects. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998;52:445–50.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1987;13:261–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thomas S, Reading J, Shephard RJ. Revision of the physical activity readiness questionnaire (PAR-Q). Can J Sport Sci. 1992;17:338–45.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sullivan MJL, Bishop S, Pivik J. The pain catastrophizing scale: development and validation. Psychol Assess. 1995;7:524–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tait RC, Chibnall JT, Krause S. The pain disability index: psychometric properties. Pain. 1990;40:171–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Anagnostis C, Gatchel RJ, Mayer TG. The pain disability questionnaire: a new psychometrically sound measure for chronic musculoskeletal disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004;29:2290–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tonkin L. The pain self-efficacy questionnaire. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54:77.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, Upper Extremity Collaborative Group. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Boixadós M, Pousada M, Bueno J, Valiente L. Quality of life questionnaire: psychometric properties and relationships to healthy behavioral patterns. Open Psychol J. 2009;2:49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine. 1983;8(2):141–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Weiden P, Rapkin B, Mott T, et al. Rating of medication influences (ROMI) scale in schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 1994;20:297–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol. 1995;242:587–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Zweig RA, Turkel E. The social adjustment scale-self-report: psychometric properties for older adults. Psychol Rep. 2007;101:920–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Corrigan PW, McCracken SG, Holmes EP. Motivational interviews as goal assessment for persons with psychiatric disability. Community Ment Health J. 2001;37:113–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nugent WR, Thomas JW. Validation of a clinical measure of self-esteem. Res Soc Work Pract. 1993;3:191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Ware JE. SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1997.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Ware JE. SF-12; how to score the SF-12 physical and mental health summary scales. Boston: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center; 1995.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Eriksen HR, Ihlebaek C, Ursin H. A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC). Scand J Public Health. 1999;27:63–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Antonovsky A. The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Soc Sci Med. 1993;36:725–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RE. The state-trait anxiety inventory: test manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press; 1970.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    DiClemente CC, Hughes SO. Stages of change profiles in outpatient alcoholism treatment. J Subst Abuse. 1990;2:217–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    van Veldhoven M, Broersen S. Measurement quality and validity of the “need for recovery scale”. Occup Environ Med. 2003;60:i3–9.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Tuomi K, Eskelinen L, Toikkanen J, Jarvinen E, Ilmarinen J, Klockars M. Work load and individual factors affecting work ability among aging municipal employees. Scand J Work Environ Health. 1991;17:128–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Horvath AO, Greenberg LS. The development and validation of the working alliance inventory. J Couns Psychol. 1989;36:223–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Bigos SJ, Battie MC, Spengler DM, et al. A prospective study of work perceptions and psychosocial factors affecting the report of back injury. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991;16:1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Folkman S, Lazarus RS, editors. Manual for the ways of coping questionnaire. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1988.Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Van Veldhoven M. Psychosociale arbeidsbelasting en werkstress [Psychosocial job demands and work stress]. Ph.D. thesis. The Netherlands: University of Groningen; 1996.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    World Health Organization. Measuring health and disability – manual for WHO disability assessment schedule (WHODAS 2.0); 2010.Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA, WHOQOL Group. The world health organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHOQOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Beaton DE, Kennedy CA. Beyond return to work: testing a measure of at-work disability in workers with musculoskeletal pain. Qual Life Res. 2005;14:1869–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Carr AJ, Thompson PW, Kirwan JR. Quality of life measures. Br J Rheumatol. 1996;35:275–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sabrina Kohler
    • 1
    Email author
  • Miriam Lückenkemper
    • 2
  • Monika E. Finger
    • 2
    • 3
  • Reuben Escorpizo
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.School of MedicineUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.ICF UnitSwiss Paraplegic ResearchNottwilSwitzerland
  3. 3.ICF Research Branch of the WHO CC FIC in Germany (DIMDI)NottwilSwitzerland
  4. 4.Department of Rehabilitation and Movement ScienceThe University of VermontBurlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations