Advertisement

Spinal Cord Injury: Vocational Rehabilitation and Disability Evaluation

  • Reuben EscorpizoEmail author
  • Logan M. Trenaman
  • William C. Miller
Chapter
Part of the Handbooks in Health, Work, and Disability book series (SHHDW)

Abstract

The experience of work and employment is a major life area to most people including persons with spinal cord injury (SCI); hence, it is crucial to understand and assess disability, which may affect work. In this chapter, the application of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) model of the World Health Organization (WHO) and how the ICF model can help us to understand and examine work disability, vocational rehabilitation, and disability evaluation and their application to individuals with SCI will be discussed.

The ICF can be used as a universal reference framework when describing the functioning of an individual with SCI whose work functioning may be less than optimal or whose condition prevents optimal employment participation. One application of the ICF is the ICF Core Set, which is an essential set of ICF categories to depict functioning. Illustration and comparison will be made in this chapter using the ICF Core Set for Vocational Rehabilitation and ICF Core Set for SCI. Finally, contextual factors (environmental and personal factors) relevant to the topic of work and SCI are also presented.

Keywords

Spinal Cord Injury Work Disability Vocational Rehabilitation Disability Evaluation Health Insurance Benefit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Furlan JC, Krassioukov A, Miller WC, Sakakibara B. Epidemiology of traumatic SCI. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller WC, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J, et al., editors. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence, vol. 4.0. Vancouver: Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence; 2012. p. 1–16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cieza A, Kirchberger I, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF core sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the long-term context. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(4):305–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kirchberger I, Cieza A, Biering-Sorensen F, Baumberger M, Charlifue S, Post MW, et al. ICF core sets for individuals with spinal cord injury in the early post-acute context. Spinal Cord. 2010;48(4):297–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guttmann L. The place of our spinal paraplegic fellowman in society. Rehabilitation. 1959;15–27.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ville I, Ravaud JF. Work values: a comparison of non-disabled persons with paraplegia. Disabil Rehabil. 1998;20(4):127–37.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krause JS. Longitudinal changes in adjustment after spinal cord injury: a 15-year study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73(6):564–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vogel LC, Klaas SJ, Lubicky JP, Anderson CJ. Long-term outcomes and life satisfaction of adults who had pediatric spinal cord injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79(12):1496–503.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ottomanelli L, Lind L. Review of critical factors related to employment after spinal cord injury: implications for research and vocational services. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32(5):503–31.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Unemployment rate: Labor force statistics from the current population survey [Internet]. United States Department of Labor. Available from: http://data.bls.gov/pdq/SurveyOutputServlet (2014).
  11. 11.
    Tomassen PC, Post MW, van Asbeck FW. Return to work after spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(1):51–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Boschen KA. Interaction of environment with individual characteristics and social participation: theoretical perspectives and applications in persons with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002;7:1–16.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chan SK, Man DW. Barriers to returning to work for people with spinal cord injuries: a focus group study. Work. 2005;25(4):325–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brage S, Donceel P, Falez F. Development of ICF core set for disability evaluation in social security. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(18):1392–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Finger ME, Escorpizo R, Glassel A, Gmunder HP, Luckenkemper M, Chan C, et al. ICF core set for vocational rehabilitation: results of an international consensus conference. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(5):429–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Escorpizo R, Miller W, Trenaman L. Work and employment. In: Eng J, Teasell R, Miller W, Wolfe D, Townson A, Hsieh J, et al., editors. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence, vol. 4.0. Vancouver: Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation Evidence; 2012. p. 1–22.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lidal IB, Huynh TK, Biering-Sorensen F. Return to work following spinal cord injury: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1341–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Anderson D, Dumont S, Azzaria L, Le Bourdais M, Noreau L. Determinants of return to work among spinal cord injury patients: a literature review. J Vocat Rehabil. 2007;27:57–68.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hirsh AT, Molton IR, Johnson KL, Bombardier CH, Jensen MP. The relationship of chronological age, age at injury, and duration of injury to employment status in individuals with spinal cord injury. Psychol Inj Law. 2009;2(3–4):263–75.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Conroy L, McKenna K. Vocational outcome following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 1999;37(9):624–33.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kruse D, Krueger A, Drastal S. Computer use, computer training, and employment. outcomes among people with spinal cord injuries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(7):891–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jongbloed L, Backman C, Forwell SJ, Carpenter C. Employment after spinal cord injury: the impact of government policies in Canada. Work. 2007;29(2):145–54.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ravaud JF, Madiot B, Ville I. Discrimination towards disabled people seeking employment. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35(8):951–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Social Development Canada. Canadian attitudes towards disability issues. Ottawa: Government of Canada; 2004.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jang Y, Wang YH, Wang JD. Return to work after spinal cord injury in Taiwan: the contribution of functional independence. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(4):681–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allen K, Blascovich J. The value of service dogs for people with severe ambulatory disabilities. A randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 1996;275(13):1001–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ottomanelli L, Goetz L, McGeough C, Suris A, Sippel J, Sinnott P, et al. Methods of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):919–30.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Arango-Lasprilla JC, Cardoso EDS, Wilson LM, Romero MG, Chan F, Sung C. Vocational rehabilitation service patterns and employment outcomes for hispanics with spinal cord injuries. Rehabil Res Policy Educ. 2011;25(3–4):149–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Reuben Escorpizo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Logan M. Trenaman
    • 4
    • 5
  • William C. Miller
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of Rehabilitation and Movement ScienceThe University of VermontBurlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Swiss Paraplegic ResearchNottwilSwitzerland
  3. 3.ICF Research BranchWHO CC FIC in Germany (DIMDI)NottwilSwitzerland
  4. 4.School of Population and Public HealthUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  5. 5.GF Strong Rehabilitation CenterVancouverCanada
  6. 6.Graduate Program in Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  7. 7.Department of Occupational Sciences and Occupational TherapyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations