Skip to main content

When the Question is Part of the Answer: Examining the Impact of Emotion Self-reports on Student Emotion

  • Conference paper
User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8538))

Abstract

A variety of methodologies have been put forth to assess students’ affective states as they use interactive learning environments (ILEs) and intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), such as classroom observations and subjective coding, self-coding by students after replays, as well as self-reports of student emotion as students are using the learning environment. Still, it is unclear what the disadvantages of each methodology are. In particular, does measuring affect by asking students to self-report alter student affect itself? The following work explores this question of how self-reports themselves can bias affective states, within one particular tutoring system, Wayang Outpost.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. D’Mello, S., Person, N., Lehman, B.: Antecedent-Consequent realtionships and Cyclical Patterns between Affective States and Problem Solving Outcomes. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., du Boulay, B., Grasser, A. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education. Building Learning Systems that Care: from Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling, pp. 57–64. IOS Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L., Stupnisky, R.H., Raymond, P.: Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control–value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology 102(3), 531–549 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Baker, R.S.J.D., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to Be Frustrated than Bored: The Incidence, Persistence, and Impact of Learners’ Cognitive-Affective States during Interactions with Three Different Computer-Based Learning Environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gee, J.P.: Situated Language and Learning: A Critique of Traditional Schooling. Routledge Taylor & Francis, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Multimodal Semi-Automated Affect Detection from Conversational Cues, Gross Body Language, and Facial Features. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 20(2), 147–187 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. D’Mello, S.K., Picard, R.W., Graesser, A.C.: Towards an Affect-Sensitive AutoTutor. Special Issue on Intelligent Educational Systems IEEE Intelligent Systems 22(4), 53–61 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arroyo, I., Woolf, B., Cooper, D., Burlesom, W., Muldner, K., Cristopherson, R.: Emotion sensors go to school. In: Dimitrova, V., Mizoguchi, R., Du Boulay, B., Graesser, A. (eds.) 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence In Education, IOS Press, Amsterdam (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ocumpaugh, J., Baker, R.S.J.D., Rodrigo, M.M.T.: Baker-Rodrigo Observation Method Protocol (BROMP) 1.0. Training Manual version 1.0. Technical Report. EdLab, Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences, New York, Manila (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Baker, R.S.J.D., Gowda, S.M., Wixon, M., Kalka, J., Wagner, A.Z., Salvi, A., Aleven, V., Kusbit, G., Ocumpaugh, J., Rossi, L.: Sensor-free automated detection of affect in a Cognitive Tutor for Algebra. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining, pp. 126–133 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Porayska-Pomsta, K., Mavrikis, M., D’Mello, S., Conati, C., Baker, R.S.J.D.: Knowledge Elicitation Methods for Affect Modeling in Education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 22(3), 107–140 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conati, C.: How to Evaluate a Model of User Affect? In: André, E., Dybkjær, L., Minker, W., Heisterkamp, P. (eds.) ADS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3068, pp. 288–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey, B.A., Konstan, J.A.: On the need for attention-aware systems: measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state. Computers in Human Behavior 22, 685–708 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Woolf, B.P., Arroyo, I., Muldner, K., Burleson, W., Cooper, D., Dolan, R., Christopherson, R.M.: The Effect of Motivational Learning Companions on Low Achieving Students and Students with Disabilities. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 327–337. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kort, B., Reilly, R., Picard, R.W.: An affective model of interplay between emotions and learning: reengineering educational pedagogy-building a learning companion. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, pp. 43–46 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mierswa, I., Wurst, M., Klinkenberg, R., Scholz, M., Euler, T.: YALE: Rapid Prototyping for Complex Data Mining Tasks. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD 2006), pp. 935–940 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychological Bulletin 70, 213–220 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pardos, Z.A., Baker, R.S.J.D., San Pedro, M.O.C.Z., Gowda, S.M., Gowda, S.M.: Affective states and state tests: Investigating how affect throughout the school year predicts end of year learning outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 117–124 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Arroyo, I., Cooper, D.G., Burleson, W., Woolf, B.P.: Bayesian Networks and Linear Regression Models of Students’ Goals, Moods, and Emotions. In: Handbook of Educational Data Mining. Chapman & Hall/CRC Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Series (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arroyo, I., Shanabrook, D., Woolf, B.P., Burleson, W.: Analyzing Affective Constructs: Emotions, Motivation and Attitudes. In: International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen, H., Masthoff, J.: Designing empathic computers: the effect of multimodal empathic feedback using animated agent. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wixon, M., Arroyo, I. (2014). When the Question is Part of the Answer: Examining the Impact of Emotion Self-reports on Student Emotion. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, GJ. (eds) User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization. UMAP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8538. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08785-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08786-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics