Abstract
There are many functional complaints in addition to diminished visual acuity. One common complaint is narrowing of the visual field, for which many examiners prefer monocular Tangent Screen visual field testing. In functional disease, the visual field does not expand as would be expected when tested at double the distance with the larger target. Instead, the functional patient frequently exhibits tunnel vision or tubular vision. Another method of testing is a monocular Goldmann visual field examination where a functional patient demonstrates inversion or spiraling of isopters. If the patient complains of night blindness, dark adaptometry or dark-adapted visual evoked response testing can be performed, though many examiners demonstrate other signs of functional disease and treat the patient with reassurance and follow-up. A functional complaint of no depth perception can be evaluated by proving the presence of binocular vision with a number of tests including Titmus Stereoacuity. The examiner can evaluate a complaint of double vision with a colored lens and a prism bar, which will merge or move images closer in true diplopia. Functional ptosis is distinguished from organic ptosis by contraction of the orbicularis in the former and contraction of the frontalis in the latter. Neuropsychological testing can be supportive of a functional diagnosis. Examiners use embedded portions of traditional personality inventories or symptom validity tests to look for inconsistencies and exaggeration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ahmad K, Wright M, Lueck CJ (2011) Ptosis. Practical Neurology 11(6):332–340. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2011-000026
Amsler M (1953) Earliest symptoms of diseases of the macula. Br J Ophthalmol, 37, 521–37
Beaumont WM (1918) Chapter XIX. Malingering in relation to sight. In: Jones AB, Llewellyn LJ (eds) Malingering or the simulation of disease. Blakiston Son & Co., Philadelphia, PA, pp 324–415
Behrman J, Levy R (1970) Neurophysiological studies on patients with hysterical disturbances of vision. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 14(2):187–194
Bernard LC, Houston W, Natoli L (1993) Malingering on neuropsychological memory tests: potential objective indicators. Journal of Clinical Psychology 49(1):45–53
Cummins JL, Miller BL (1987) Visual hallucinations: Clinical occurrence and use in differential diagnosis. The Western Journal of Medicine 146:46–51
Enoch J (2002) Hans Goldmann: Scholar, Clinician, Friend. Hindsight, Newsletter of the Optometric Historical Society, St. Louis, MO
Gloor BP (2010) Hans Goldmann (1899–1991). European Journal of Ophthalmology 20:1–11
Green J (1889) On certain stereoscopic illusions evoked by prismatic and cylindrical spectacles. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 5:449–456
Harris M (2012) The malingering of psychotic disorders. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry 15(1):12–24
Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR (2009) American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 23(7):1093–1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063
Hurst AF, Symns JLM (1919) Narrow and spiral fields of vision in hysteria, malingering, and neurasthenia. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 3(1):17–21
Kucharski LT, Duncan S, Egan SS, Falkenbach DM (2006) Psychopathy and malingering of psychiatric disorder in criminal defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 24(5):633–644
Kucharski LT, Toomey JP, Fila K, Duncan S (2007) Detection of malingering of psychiatric disorder with the personality assessment inventory: an investigation of criminal defendants. Journal of Personality Assessment 88(1):25–32
Lessell S, Currie JN (1983) Ocular motility testing in the evaluation of visual hallucinations. American Journal of Ophthalmology 95(6):772–774
Lippincott JA (1890) New tests for binocular vision. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 5:560–564
McCullumsmith CB, Ford CV (2011) Simulated illness: the factitious disorders and malingering. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America 34(3):621–641. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2011.05.013
Resnick PJ (1988) Chapter 3. Malingered psychosis. In: Rogers R (ed) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. The Guilford Press, New York City, NY
Rogers R (1988) Chapter 16. Current status of clinical methods. In: Rogers R (ed) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. The Guilford Press, New York City, NY
Rogers, R (Ed.). (2012). Psychometric methods. In Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd edn., p. 526). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Rogers R, Kropp P, Bagby R, Dickens S (1992) Faking specific disorders: A study of the structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS). Journal of Clinical Psychology 48(5):643–648
Rogers R, Ornduff S, Sewell K (1993) Feigning specific disorders: A study of the personality assessment inventory (PAI). Journal of Personality Assessment 60(3):554–560
Rogers R, Sewell KW, Grandjean NR, Vitacco MJ (2002) The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures. Psychological Assessment 14(2):177–183
Rose FE, Hall S, Szalda-Petree AD, Bach PJ (1998) A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 13(4):349–363
Rosenfeld B, Sands SA, Van Gorp WG (2000) Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 15(4):349–359
Schretlen DJ (1988) The use of psychological tests to identify malingered symptoms of mental disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 8(5):451–476
Shimamoto E, Mori F, Ishiko S, Takahashi A, Izumi N, Yoshida A (2005) Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in visual conversion reaction. British Journal of Ophthalmology 89(3):391–392
Slavin ML (1987) The use of the red amsler grid and red-green lenses in detecting spurious paracentral visual field defects. American Journal of Ophthalmology 103(3):338–339
Slick DJ, Tan JE, Strauss EH, Hultsch DF (2004) Detecting malingering: A survey of experts’ practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19(4):465–473
Spector RH (1990) Visual fields. In: Walker H, Hall W, Hurst J (eds) Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations, 3rd edn. Butterworths, A Division of Reed Publishing, Boston
Taren, D. (WHO). (2012). Historical and practical uses of assessing night blindness as an indicator for vitamin A deficiency. World Health Organization. Report: Priorities in the assessment of vitamin A and iron status in populations, Panama City, Panama, 15–17 September 2010.
Varano M, Scassa C (1998) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry. Seminars in Ophthalmology 13(4):203–209
Walsh TJ (1990) Functional visual loss. In: Walsh TJ (ed) Visual fields—Examination and interpretation (ophthalmology monographs 3). American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA, pp 215–219
Wall, M., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system. In N. R. Miller, N. J. Newman, V. Biousse, & J. B. Kerrison (Eds.), Walsh Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology (6th ed., pp. 83–150). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Youngjohn JR, Lees-Haley PR, Binder LM (1999) Comment: Warning malingerers produces more sophisticated malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 14(6):511–516
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
11.1 Electronic Supplementary Materials
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Tangent screen visual fields_1 (MOV 173526 kb)
Tangent Screen visual fields_2 (MOV 173526 kb)
Goldman visual fields_1 (MOV 372269 kb)
Goldman visual fields_2 (MOV 372269 kb)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Enzenauer, R., Morris, W., O’Donnell, T., Montrey, J. (2014). Tests for Miscellaneous Functional Visual Complaints. In: Functional Ophthalmic Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08750-4_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08750-4_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08749-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08750-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)