Skip to main content

Tests for Miscellaneous Functional Visual Complaints

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Functional Ophthalmic Disorders

Abstract

There are many functional complaints in addition to diminished visual acuity. One common complaint is narrowing of the visual field, for which many examiners prefer monocular Tangent Screen visual field testing. In functional disease, the visual field does not expand as would be expected when tested at double the distance with the larger target. Instead, the functional patient frequently exhibits tunnel vision or tubular vision. Another method of testing is a monocular Goldmann visual field examination where a functional patient demonstrates inversion or spiraling of isopters. If the patient complains of night blindness, dark adaptometry or dark-adapted visual evoked response testing can be performed, though many examiners demonstrate other signs of functional disease and treat the patient with reassurance and follow-up. A functional complaint of no depth perception can be evaluated by proving the presence of binocular vision with a number of tests including Titmus Stereoacuity. The examiner can evaluate a complaint of double vision with a colored lens and a prism bar, which will merge or move images closer in true diplopia. Functional ptosis is distinguished from organic ptosis by contraction of the orbicularis in the former and contraction of the frontalis in the latter. Neuropsychological testing can be supportive of a functional diagnosis. Examiners use embedded portions of traditional personality inventories or symptom validity tests to look for inconsistencies and exaggeration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad K, Wright M, Lueck CJ (2011) Ptosis. Practical Neurology 11(6):332–340. doi:10.1136/practneurol-2011-000026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Amsler M (1953) Earliest symptoms of diseases of the macula. Br J Ophthalmol, 37, 521–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaumont WM (1918) Chapter XIX. Malingering in relation to sight. In: Jones AB, Llewellyn LJ (eds) Malingering or the simulation of disease. Blakiston Son & Co., Philadelphia, PA, pp 324–415

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrman J, Levy R (1970) Neurophysiological studies on patients with hysterical disturbances of vision. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 14(2):187–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard LC, Houston W, Natoli L (1993) Malingering on neuropsychological memory tests: potential objective indicators. Journal of Clinical Psychology 49(1):45–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins JL, Miller BL (1987) Visual hallucinations: Clinical occurrence and use in differential diagnosis. The Western Journal of Medicine 146:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Enoch J (2002) Hans Goldmann: Scholar, Clinician, Friend. Hindsight, Newsletter of the Optometric Historical Society, St. Louis, MO

    Google Scholar 

  • Gloor BP (2010) Hans Goldmann (1899–1991). European Journal of Ophthalmology 20:1–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Green J (1889) On certain stereoscopic illusions evoked by prismatic and cylindrical spectacles. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 5:449–456

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harris M (2012) The malingering of psychotic disorders. Jefferson Journal of Psychiatry 15(1):12–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbronner RL, Sweet JJ, Morgan JE, Larrabee GJ, Millis SR (2009) American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist 23(7):1093–1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst AF, Symns JLM (1919) Narrow and spiral fields of vision in hysteria, malingering, and neurasthenia. The British Journal of Ophthalmology 3(1):17–21

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharski LT, Duncan S, Egan SS, Falkenbach DM (2006) Psychopathy and malingering of psychiatric disorder in criminal defendants. Behavioral Sciences & the Law 24(5):633–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kucharski LT, Toomey JP, Fila K, Duncan S (2007) Detection of malingering of psychiatric disorder with the personality assessment inventory: an investigation of criminal defendants. Journal of Personality Assessment 88(1):25–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lessell S, Currie JN (1983) Ocular motility testing in the evaluation of visual hallucinations. American Journal of Ophthalmology 95(6):772–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lippincott JA (1890) New tests for binocular vision. Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society 5:560–564

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCullumsmith CB, Ford CV (2011) Simulated illness: the factitious disorders and malingering. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America 34(3):621–641. doi:10.1016/j.psc.2011.05.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Resnick PJ (1988) Chapter 3. Malingered psychosis. In: Rogers R (ed) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. The Guilford Press, New York City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R (1988) Chapter 16. Current status of clinical methods. In: Rogers R (ed) Clinical assessment of malingering and deception. The Guilford Press, New York City, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R (Ed.). (2012). Psychometric methods. In Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (3rd edn., p. 526). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Kropp P, Bagby R, Dickens S (1992) Faking specific disorders: A study of the structured interview of reported symptoms (SIRS). Journal of Clinical Psychology 48(5):643–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Ornduff S, Sewell K (1993) Feigning specific disorders: A study of the personality assessment inventory (PAI). Journal of Personality Assessment 60(3):554–560

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers R, Sewell KW, Grandjean NR, Vitacco MJ (2002) The detection of feigned mental disorders on specific competency measures. Psychological Assessment 14(2):177–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rose FE, Hall S, Szalda-Petree AD, Bach PJ (1998) A comparison of four tests of malingering and the effects of coaching. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 13(4):349–363

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld B, Sands SA, Van Gorp WG (2000) Have we forgotten the base rate problem? Methodological issues in the detection of distortion. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 15(4):349–359

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schretlen DJ (1988) The use of psychological tests to identify malingered symptoms of mental disorder. Clinical Psychology Review 8(5):451–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimamoto E, Mori F, Ishiko S, Takahashi A, Izumi N, Yoshida A (2005) Use of scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in visual conversion reaction. British Journal of Ophthalmology 89(3):391–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slavin ML (1987) The use of the red amsler grid and red-green lenses in detecting spurious paracentral visual field defects. American Journal of Ophthalmology 103(3):338–339

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slick DJ, Tan JE, Strauss EH, Hultsch DF (2004) Detecting malingering: A survey of experts’ practices. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 19(4):465–473

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spector RH (1990) Visual fields. In: Walker H, Hall W, Hurst J (eds) Clinical methods: The history, physical, and laboratory examinations, 3rd edn. Butterworths, A Division of Reed Publishing, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Taren, D. (WHO). (2012). Historical and practical uses of assessing night blindness as an indicator for vitamin A deficiency. World Health Organization. Report: Priorities in the assessment of vitamin A and iron status in populations, Panama City, Panama, 15–17 September 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varano M, Scassa C (1998) Scanning laser ophthalmoscope microperimetry. Seminars in Ophthalmology 13(4):203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh TJ (1990) Functional visual loss. In: Walsh TJ (ed) Visual fields—Examination and interpretation (ophthalmology monographs 3). American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco, CA, pp 215–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, M., & Johnson, C. A. (2005). Principles and techniques of the examination of the visual sensory system. In N. R. Miller, N. J. Newman, V. Biousse, & J. B. Kerrison (Eds.), Walsh Hoyt’s clinical neuro-ophthalmology (6th ed., pp. 83–150). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngjohn JR, Lees-Haley PR, Binder LM (1999) Comment: Warning malingerers produces more sophisticated malingering. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology 14(6):511–516

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

11.1 Electronic Supplementary Materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Tangent screen visual fields_1 (MOV 173526 kb)

Tangent Screen visual fields_2 (MOV 173526 kb)

Goldman visual fields_1 (MOV 372269 kb)

Goldman visual fields_2 (MOV 372269 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enzenauer, R., Morris, W., O’Donnell, T., Montrey, J. (2014). Tests for Miscellaneous Functional Visual Complaints. In: Functional Ophthalmic Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08750-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08750-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08749-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08750-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics