Microfluidics and Lab-on-a-Chip Devices: History and Challenges

  • Jaime Castillo-LeónEmail author


The rapid advances in microfabrication and nanofabrication in combination with the synthesis and discovery of new materials have propelled the drive to develop new technological devices such as smartphones, personal and tablet computers. These devices have changed the way humankind interacts and communicates and this change occurred very quickly due in part to decreased production and commercialization costs. As a result, not only nations with powerful economies but also emerging economies and poor countries can get access to these technologies and experience new ways to interact and instantly communicate what is happening around us. Following the advances of all these communication devices as well as those in microfabrication and nanofabrication and the emergence of new materials, technologies such as lab-on-a-chip (LOC) and micro total analysis systems (microTAS) were also boosted, albeit at a slower pace. LOC and microTAS applications have principally been utilized in the biomedical, food and environmental fields. But lately they have also found their place in the synthesis of new chemical compounds and the fabrication of nanostructures. It has become obvious that the LOC and microTAS technologies need to join forces with those behind the new communication devices which provide sources of power, detection and data transmission complementing the features that lab-on-a-chip and microTAS platforms can offer. An increasing number of microfluidic-based devices, developed both in small start-ups and large pharmaceutical and biomedical companies, is being released and entering the market. This chapter offers an overview of the first events in the history of LOC and microTAS devices, the biggest achievements and the challenges that still need to be overcome in order to accelerate the use of this technology.


Microfluidic Device Microfluidic Chip Fabrication Method Strip Chart Recorder Poiseuille Equation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Araci IE, Brisk P (2014) Recent developments in microfluidic large scale integration. Curr Opin Biotechnol 25:60–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassous E, Taub HH, Kuhn L (1977) Ink jet printing nozzle arrays etched in silicon. Appl Phys Lett 31:135–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brock DC (2011) A measure of success. Chem Herit Mag 29(1)Google Scholar
  4. Chin CD, Linder V, Sia SK (2012) Commercialization of microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 12:2118–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Choi K, Ng AHC, Fobel R, Wheeler AR (2012) Digital microfluidics. Ann Rev Anal Chem 5:413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy DC, McDonald C, Schueller OJA, Whitesides GM (1998) Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems in poly(dimethylsiloxane). Anal Chem 70:4974–4984CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gazzaniga V (1999) Uroporphyria: some notes on its ancient historical background. Am J Nephrol 19:159–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gross BC, Erkal JL, Lockwood SY, Chen C, Spence DM (2014) Evaluation of 3D printing and its potential impact on biotechnology and the chemical sciences. Anal Chem 86:3240–3253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Harrison DJ, Flury K, Seiler K, Fan Z, Effenhauser CS, Manz A (1993) Micromachining a miniaturized capillary electrophoresis based chemical analysis system on a chip. Science 261:895–897CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kim SM, Lee SH, Suh KY (2008) Cell research with phisically modified microfluidic channels: a review. Lab Chip 8:1015–1023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kitson PJ, Rosnes MH, Sans V, Dragone V, Cronin L (2012) Configurable 3D-printed millifluidic and microfluidic “lab on a chip” reactionware devices. Lab Chip 12:3267–3271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kouba E, Wallen E, Pruthi RS (2007) Uroscopy by Hippocrates and Theophilus: prognosis versus diagnosis. J Urol 177:50–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lee A (2013) The third decade of microfluidics. Lab Chip 13:1660–1661CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Mark D, von Stetten F, Zengerle R (2012) Microfluidic Apps for off-the-shelf instruments. Lab Chip 12:2464–2468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Martinez AW, Phillips ST, Butte MJ, Whitesides GM (2007) Patterned paper as a platform for inexpensive, low-volume, portable bioassays. Angew Chem 119:1340–1342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moraes C, Labuz JM, Leung BM, Inoue M, Chun T, Takayama S (2013) On being the right size: scaling effects in designing a human-on-a-chip. Integr Biol 5(9):1149–1161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pollack MG, Fair RB, Shenderov AD (2000) Electrowetting-based actuation of liquid droplets for microfluidic applications. Appl Phys Lett 77:1725–1726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Tasoglu S, Gurkan UA, Wang S, Demirci U (2013) Manipulating biological agents and cells in micro-scale volumes for applications in medicine. Chem Soc Rev 42:5788–5808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. van der Meer AD, van den Berg A (2012) Organs-on-chips: breaking the in vitro impasse. Integr Biol 4:461–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wallis F (2000) Inventing diagnosis: Theophilus’ De urinis in the classroom. Acta Hips Med Sci Hist Illus 20:31–73MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. Wittern-Sterzel R (2000) Diagnosis: the doctor and the urine glass. Lancet 354:SIV13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Xia Y, Whitesides GM (1998) Soft lithography. Annu Rev Mater Sci 28:153–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yetisen AK, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2013) Paper-based microfluidic point-of-care diagnostic devices. Lab Chip 13:2210–2251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yetisen AK, Martinez-Hurtado JL, da Cruz VF, Simsekler MCE, Akram MS, Lowe CR (2014) The regulation of mobile medical applications. Lab Chip 14:833–840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Young EWK (2013) Cells, tissues, and organs on chips: challenges and opportunities for the cancer tumor microenvironment. Integr Biol 5:1096–1109CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.DTU NanotechTechnical University of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
  2. 2.Sol Voltaics ABLundSweden

Personalised recommendations