Towards a Knowledge Transfer 2.0 Process with an Impact on a Companies of Social Business

  • Lillyana María Giraldo
  • Luis Joyanes
  • Marta S. Tabares
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 185)


This paper discusses a knowledge transfer 2.0 process that guides the construction of knowledge networks in collaborative environments based on the business model put forward by social business. This process is defined as a workspace to deployment the knowledge transfer 2.0 model (COOPIN 2.0), which was created to strengthen multi-directional communication that actively uses social media. The process was developed in three stages. As a starting point, work was focused on the cultural change towards knowledge transfer and organizational collaboration. Then, the process of knowledge transfer was designed following the methods of observation, experimentation, analysis, and assessment, using a case study to assess the validity of the process. The results shown a change in individual and organizational culture towards a culture of knowledge transfer, along with improving maturity levels in terms of collaboration since the onset of the process. Thus, we come to the conclusion that any knowledge-creation company should adhere to a knowledge transfer process in order to support the company’s social business.


Knowledge transfer 2.0 Social business, social media Cooperation Participation Interactivity Collaboration 


  1. 1.
    Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: an open source software for exploring and manipulating networks. In: ICWSM, pp. 361–362 (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boughzala, I., Dudezert, A.: Knowledge Management 2.0: Organizational Models and Strategies. IGI Global, Hershey (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bughin, J., Chui, M.: The rise of the networked enterprise: web 2.0 finds its payday. McKinsey Quarterly (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bughin, J.; Chui, M.: Evolution of the networked enterprise: McKinsey Global Survey results. McKinsey Quarterly (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuetterer, S.: Social Business. Cómo la tecnología social y las personas contribuyen. Best Relations S.L (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M.: Users of the world, unite! the challenges and opportunities of social media. Bus. Horiz. 53, 59–68 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiron, D.; Palmer, D.; Nguyen, A.; Berkman, R.: Findings from the 2013 Social Business Global Executive Study and Research Project. Social Business: Shifting Out of First Gear. MIT Sloan Management Review. University Press (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Knoke, D., Yang, S.: Social Network Analysis, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Laudon, K., Laudon, J.: Management Information Systems, 12th edn. Pearson, México (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., Konno, N.: Seci, Ba and leadership: a unified model of dynamic knowledge creation. Long Range Plan. 33, 5–34 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nonaka, I., Konno, N.: The concept of “Ba”: building a foundation for knowledge creation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 40(3), 40–54 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yin, R.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1994)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Systems Engineering ProgramSchool of Engineerings, University of MedellínMedellínColombia
  2. 2.School of Architecture and EngineeringPontifical University of SalamancaMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations