E-HR Adoption in Taiwan: An Exploration of Potential Multilevel Antecedents and Consequences

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 185)

Abstract

E-HR refers to conducting human resources related business transactions electronically and specifically on the internet. This research attempts to investigate e-HR adoption in Taiwan in an integrated model that includes possible antecedents and consequences from a multilevel perspective. Data were collected from human resource professionals in Taiwan. The preliminary correlational analysis found strategic leadership and IT capability as significant firm level antecedents, while role complexity as the personnel level antecedent of e-HR adoption. However, extensive e-HR adoption only contributes to personnel level outcomes such as HR staff’s strategic focus and competence as a HR professional.

Keywords

E-HR adoption Strategic leadership IT capability Role complexity Task complexity Strategic focus HR competence HR efficiency 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan, ROC. (NSC 100-2410-H-003-111).

References

  1. 1.
    Lengnick-Hall, M., Moritz, S.: The impact of e-HR on the human resource management function. J. Labor Res. 24(3), 365–379 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yeh, C.R., Lu, C.J., Tan, Z.E.: A case study on the e-HR system of an air cargo services company. Paper accepted by the 2011 international conference on electronic commerce, administration, society, and education (e-CASE 2011), Tokyo, January 2011Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell, B.S., Lee, S.-W., Yeung, S.K.: The impact of e-HR on professional competence in HRM: implications for the development of HR professionals. Hum. Resour. Manage. 45(3), 295–308 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strohmeier, S., Kabst, R.D.: Organizational adoption of e-HRM in Europe. J. Manag. Psychol. 24(6), 482–501 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mishra, A., Akman, I.: Information technology in human resource management: an empirical assessment. Public Pers. Manag. 3(39), 271–290 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Panayotopoulou, L., Vakola, M., Galanaki, E.: E-HR adoption and the role of HRM: evidence from Greece. Pers. Rev. 36(2), 277–294 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panayotopoulou, L., Galanaki, E., Papalexandris, N.: Adoption of electronic systems in HRM: is national background of the firm relevant? New Technol. Work Employ. 25(3), 253–269 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tornatzky, L.G., Fleischer, M.: The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington Books, Lexington (1990)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cannella, A., Finkelstein, S., Hambrick, D.C.: Strategic Leadership: Theory and Research on Executives, Top Management teams, and Boards. Oxford University Press, New York (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Goodhue, D.L., Thompson, R.L.: Task-technology fit and individual performance. MIS Q. 19(2), 213–236 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ulrich, D.: Human Resource Champions: The Next Agenda for Adding Value and Delivering Results. Harvard University Press, Boston (1997)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jackson, P., Harris, L.: E-business and organisational change: reconciling traditional values with business transformation. J. Organ. Change Manag. 16(5), 497–511 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Daft, R.L., Macintosh, N.B.: A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Adm. Sci. Q. 26(2), 207–224 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H.: Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Manage. Sci. 32(5), 554–571 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ensher, E.A., Nielson, T.R., Grant-Vallone, E.: Tales from the hiring line: effects of the internet and technology on HR processes. Org. Dyn. 31(3), 224–244 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ulrich, D.: From e-business to e-HR. Hum. Resour. Plann. 23(2), 12–21 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haines, V.Y., Lafleur, G.: Information technology usage and human resource roles and effectiveness. Hum. Resour. Manage. 47(3), 525–540 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chen, M.S., Wu, W.C.: Strategic leadership: measurement and an assessment of reliability and validity. NTU Manage. Rev. 18(2), 63–78 (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Withey, M., Daft, R., Cooper, W.: Measures of Perrow’s work unit technology: an empirical assessment and a new scale. Acad. Manag. J. 26(1), 45–63 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perrow, C.: A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 32(2), 194–208 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., Podsakoff, N.P.: Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J. Appl. Psychol. 88(5), 879–903 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Thong, J.Y.L.: Resource constraints and information systems implementation in Singaporean small businesses. Omega 29(2), 143–156 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Salem, M.A.-G.: Obstacles to successful implementation of strategic decisions: the British experience. Eur. Bus. Rev. 98(6), 322–327 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Graduate Institute of International Human Resource DevelopmentNational Taiwan Normal UniversityTaipeiTaiwan (R.O.C)

Personalised recommendations