Abstract
Traditional approaches in deontic logic have focused on the so-called reportative reading of obligation sentences, by providing truth-functional semantics based on a primitive ideality order between possible worlds. Those approaches, however, do not take into account that, in natural language, obligation sentences primarily carry a prescriptive effect. The paper focuses precisely on that prescriptive character, and shows that the reportative reading can be derived from the prescriptive one. A dynamic, non truth-functional semantics for necessity deontic modals is developed, in which the ideality relations among possible worlds can be updated. Finally, it is proven that the semantics solves several of the classic deontic paradoxes.
I would like to thank Reinhard Muskens, Alan Thomas, Dominik Klein and the anonymous referees of DEON 2014 for their suggestions and comments on the issues discussed in this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourrón, C.: Philosophical Foundations of Deontic Logic and the Logic of Defeasible Conditionals. In: Meyer, J.-J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) Deontic Logic in Computer Science: Normative System Specification, pp. 43–84. John Wiley & Sons (1993)
Aucher, G., Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Prescriptive and Descriptive Obligations in Dynamic Epistemic Deontic Logic. In: Casanovas, P., Pagallo, U., Sartor, G., Ajani, G. (eds.) AICOL-II/JURIX 2009. LNCS, vol. 6237, pp. 150–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Austin, J.L.: How to do things with words. The William James Lectures delivered at Harvard University in 1955. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)
Condoravdi, C.: Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past. In: Beaver, D., Kaufmann, S., Casillas, L. (eds.) The construction of meaning, pp. 59–88. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2002)
Condoravdi, C., Lauren, S.: Speaking of Preferences: Imperative and Desiderative Assertions in Context. In: Speaking of Possibility and Time: The 7th Workshop on Inferential Mechanisms and their Linguistic Manifestation, http://www.sven-lauer.net/output/CondoravdiLauer-SoPaT10-desiderative-imperative-assertions.pdf
Hansson, B.: An Analysis of some Deontic Logics. Deontic Logic: Introductory and Systematic Readings, Synthese Library 33, 121–147 (1971)
Kaufmann, S., Schwager, M.: A uniform analysis of conditional imperatives. Proceedings of SALTÂ 19 (2009)
Kolodny, N., MacFarlane, J.: Ifs and Oughts. Journal of Philosophy 107(3), 115–143 (2010)
Kratzer, A.: The notional category of modality. In: Eikmeyer, H.J., Reiser, A. (eds.) Words, Worlds and Contexts. New Approaches in Word Semantics, pp. 38–74. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin (1981)
Lewis, D.: Counterfactuals. Oxford, Blackwell (1973)
Makinson, D.: On a Fundamental Problem of Deontic Logic. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies in Deontic Logic and Computer Science. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Application, vol. 49, pp. 29–53. IOS Press (1999)
Meyer, J.-J.C.: A Different Approach to Deontic Logic: Deontic Logic Viewed as a Variant of Dynamic Logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29(1), 109–136 (1988)
Prakken, H., Sergot, M.: Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-duty Obligations. In: Nute, D.N. (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic, pp. 223–262. Synthese Library, Kluwer (1997)
Schwager, M.: Interpreting Imperatives. PhD thesis, Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universtät, Frankfurt am Main (2006)
Spohn, W.: An analysis of Hansson’s dyadic deontic logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 4, 237–252 (1975)
Stalnaker, R.C.: Assertion. In: Cole, P. (ed.) Syntax and Semantics, vol. 9, pp. 315–332 (1978)
Yamada, T.: Logical dynamics of some speech acts that affect obligations and preferences. Synthese 165, 295–315 (2008)
van der Torre, L.W.N., Tan, Y.: The many faces of defeasibility in defeasible deontic logic. In: Nute, D.N. (ed.) Defeasible Deontic Logic, pp. 79–121. Synthese Library, Kluwer (1997)
van der Torre, L.W.N., Tan, Y.: An Update Semantics for Deontic Reasoning. In: McNamara, P., Prakken, H. (eds.) Norms, Logics and Information Systems: New Studies on Deontic Logic and Computer Science, pp. 73–90. IOS Press (1999)
van Rooij, R.: Permission to change. Journal of Semantics 17(2), 119–143 (2000)
Veltman, F.: Defaults in Update Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25, 221–261 (1996)
Veltman, F.: Or else, what? Imperatives on the borderline of semantics and pragmatics. Lego Seminar presentation, Institute for Logic, Language and Computation, Amsterdam (2012)
Willer, M.: A Remark on Iffy Oughts. Journal of Philosophy 109(7), 449–461 (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marra, A. (2014). For a Dynamic Semantics of Necessity Deontic Modals. In: Cariani, F., Grossi, D., Meheus, J., Parent, X. (eds) Deontic Logic and Normative Systems. DEON 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8554. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08615-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08614-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08615-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)