OTTER Proofs in Tarskian Geometry
We report on a project to use OTTER to find proofs of the theorems in Tarskian geometry proved in Szmielew’s part (Part I) of . These theorems start with fundamental properties of betweenness, and end with the development of geometric definitions of addition and multiplication that permit the representation of models of geometry as planes over Euclidean fields, or over real-closed fields in the case of full continuity. They include the four challenge problems left unsolved by Quaife, who two decades ago found some OTTER proofs in Tarskian geometry (solving challenges issued in ).
Quaife’s four challenge problems were: every line segment has a midpoint; every segment is the base of some isosceles triangle; the outer Pasch axiom (assuming inner Pasch as an axiom); and the first outer connectivity property of betweenness. These are to be proved without any parallel axiom and without even line-circle continuity. These are difficult theorems, the first proofs of which were the heart of Gupta’s Ph. D. thesis under Tarski. OTTER proved them all in 2012. Our success, we argue, is due to improvements in techniques of automated deduction, rather than to increases in computer speed and memory.
The theory of Hilbert (1899) can be translated into Tarski’s language, interpreting lines as pairs of distinct points, and angles as ordered triples of non-collinear points. Under this interpretation, the axioms of Hilbert either occur among, or are easily deduced from, theorems in the first 11 (of 16) chapters of Szmielew. We have found Otter proofs of all of Hilbert’s axioms from Tarski’s axioms (i.e. through Satz 11.49 of Szmielew, plus Satz 12.11). Narboux and Braun have recently checked these same proofs in Coq.
KeywordsInference Rule Automate Reasoning Isosceles Triangle Automate Deduction Proof Check
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Beeson, M.: The Tarski formalization project, http://www.michaelbeeson.com/research/FormalTarski/index.php
- 2.Braun, G., Narboux, J.: From Tarski to Hilbert. In: Ida, T., Fleuriot, J. (eds.) Automated Deduction in Geometry 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
- 4.Gupta, H.N.: Contributions to the Axiomatic Foundations of Geometry. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Berkeley (1965)Google Scholar
- 5.Hilbert, D.: Foundations of Geometry (Grundlagen der Geometrie), 2nd English edn. Open Court, La Salle (1960), translated from the tenth German edition by Leo Unger. Original publication date (1899)Google Scholar
- 6.Pasch, M.: Vorlesung über Neuere Geometrie. Teubner, Leipzig (1882)Google Scholar
- 7.Pasch, M., Dehn, M.: Vorlesung über Neuere Geometrie. B. G. Teubner, Leipzig (1926), The 1st edn. (1882), which is the one digitized by Google Scholar, does not contain the appendix by DehnGoogle Scholar
- 9.Schwabhäuser, W., Szmielew, W., Tarski, A.: Metamathematische Methoden in der Geometrie: Teil I: Ein axiomatischer Aufbau der euklidischen Geometrie. In: Teil II: Metamathematische Betrachtungen (Hochschultext). Springer (1983); reprinted 2012 by Ishi Press, with a new foreword by Michael BeesonGoogle Scholar
- 10.Tarski, A.: A decision method for elementary algebra and geometry. Tech. Rep. R-109, 2nd revised edn., reprinted in , pp. 24–84. Rand Corporation (1951)Google Scholar
- 11.Tarski, A.: What is elementary geometry? In: Henkin, L., Suppes, P., Tarksi, A. (eds.) The Axiomatic Method, with Special Reference to Geometry and Physics. Proceedings of an International Symposium held at the Univ. of Calif., Berkeley, December 26, 1957-January 4, 1958. Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, pp. 16–29. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1959); available as a 2007 reprint, Brouwer Press, ISBN 1-443-72812-8Google Scholar
- 15.Wos, L.: Automated reasoning: 33 basic research problems. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1988)Google Scholar
- 17.Wos, L., Pieper, G.W.: A fascinating country in the world of computing. World Scientific (1999)Google Scholar