Skip to main content

The Bayesian Description Logic \({\mathcal{BEL}}\)

  • Conference paper
Book cover Automated Reasoning (IJCAR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8562))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce the probabilistic Description Logic \({\mathcal{BEL}}\). In \({\mathcal{BEL}}\), axioms are required to hold only in an associated context. The probabilistic component of the logic is given by a Bayesian network that describes the joint probability distribution of the contexts. We study the main reasoning problems in this logic; in particular, we (i) prove that deciding positive and almost-sure entailments is not harder for \({\mathcal{BEL}}\) than for the BN, and (ii) show how to compute the probability, and the most likely context for a consequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F.: Terminological cycles in a description logic with existential restrictions. In: Proc. 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2003), pp. 325–330. Morgan Kaufmann (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Knechtel, M., Peñaloza, R.: A generic approach for large-scale ontological reasoning in the presence of access restrictions to the ontology’s axioms. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 49–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Knechtel, M., Peñaloza, R.: Context-dependent views to axioms and consequences of semantic web ontologies. J. of Web Semantics, 12–13, 22–40 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Automata-based axiom pinpointing. J. of Automated Reasoning 45(2), 91–129 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Axiom pinpointing in general tableaux. J. of Logic and Computation 20(1), 5–34 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Pinpointing in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}^+\). In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 52–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and—what else? In: Proc. 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI 2004), pp. 298–302. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ceylan, İ.İ.: Context-Sensitive Bayesian Description Logics. Master’s thesis, Dresden University of Technology, Germany (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cook, S.A.: The complexity of theorem-proving procedures. In: Proc. Third Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 1971, pp. 151–158. ACM, New York (1971), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/800157.805047

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Cooper, G.F.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using bayesian belief networks (research note). Artif. Intel. 42(2-3), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. da Costa, P.C.G., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J.: Pr-owl: A bayesian ontology language for the semantic web. In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005 - 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5327, pp. 88–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Lukasiewicz, T.: Tractable reasoning with bayesian description logics. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 146–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Darwiche, A.: Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.: Parameterized Complexity. Monographs in Computer Science. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koller, D., Levy, A.Y., Pfeffer, A.: P-classic: A tractable probablistic description logic. In: Proc. 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1997), pp. 390–397. AAAI Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web. J. of Web Semantics 6(4), 291–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Riguzzi, F., Bellodi, E., Lamma, E., Zese, R.: Epistemic and statistical probabilistic ontologies. In: Proc. 8th Int. Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web (URSW 2012), vol. 900, pp. 3–14. CEUR-WS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roth, D.: On the hardness of approximate reasoning. Artif. Intel. 82(1-2), 273–302 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ceylan, İ.İ., Peñaloza, R. (2014). The Bayesian Description Logic \({\mathcal{BEL}}\) . In: Demri, S., Kapur, D., Weidenbach, C. (eds) Automated Reasoning. IJCAR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8562. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08587-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08587-6_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08586-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08587-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics