Soybean Production in the Americas



Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) is one of the most important legume crops in the world. Approximately 80 % of the world’s soybean is produced by countries in North and South America. Biological nitrogen fixation (BNF) in soybeans, due to the symbiosis with Bradyrhizobium , is economically and ecologically beneficial because it reduces the need for synthetic N-fertilizers . This chapter describes history and trends of soybean production, influence of soybean BNF, and development of inoculants to increase the crop yield in North and South America.


Biological Nitrogen Fixation Soybean Production Soybean Crop Soybean Cultivation Germplasm Resource Information Network 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Critical review and editing was provided by Dr. Thomas Chrzanowski from the Department of Biology at UT-Arlington


  1. Baldwin IL, Fred EB (1929) Strain variation in the root nodule bacteria of clover, Rhizobium trifolii. J Bacteriol 17:17–18Google Scholar
  2. Burkart MR, James, DE (1999) Agricultural-nitrogen contributions to hypoxia in the Gulf of Mexico. J Environ Qual 28: 850–859.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burton JC, Curley RL (1965) Comparative efficiency of liquid and peat-base inoculants on field-grown soybean (Glycine max). Agron J 57:379–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. De Bruin JL, Pedersen P, Conley SP et al (2010) Probability of yield response to inoculants in fields with a history of soybean. Crop Sci 50:265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Delamuta JR, Ribeiro RA, Ormeno-Orrillo E et al (2013) Polyphasic evidence supporting the reclassification of Bradyrhizobium japonicum group Ia strains as Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:3342–3351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Herridge DF, Peoples MB, Boddey RM (2008) Global inputs of biological nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Plant Soil 311:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hungria M, Campo RJ (2004) Economical and environmental benefits of inoculation and biological nitrogen fixation with soybean: situation in South America. In: World Soybean Research Conference, 7., International Soybean Processing and Utilization Conference, 4., Brazilian Soybean Congress, 3. Proceedings, Embrapa Soja, Londrina, Brazil, pp 488–498Google Scholar
  8. Hungria M, Mendes IC (2014) Nitrogen fixation with soybean: the perfect symbiosis?. In: de Bruijn F (ed) Biological nitrogen fixation. Wiley-Blackwell, New Jersey. (Wiley Publisher, Hoboken)Google Scholar
  9. Hungria M, Franchini JC, Campo RJ et al (2005) The importance of nitrogen fixation to soybean cropping in South American. In: Werner D, Newton WE (eds) Nitrogen fixation in agriculture, forestry, ecology, and the environment. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 25–42Google Scholar
  10. Hungria M, Campo RJ, Mendes IC et al (2006) Contribution of biological nitrogen fixation to the N nutrition of grain crops in the tropics: the success of soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) in South America. In: Singh RP, Shankar N, Jaiwal PK (eds) Nitrogen nutrition and sustainable plant productivity. Studium Press/LCC, Houston, pp 43–93Google Scholar
  11. Hungria M, Nogueira MA, Araujo RS (2013) Co-inoculation of soybeans and common beans with rhizobia and azospirilla: strategies to improve sustainability. Biol Fertil Soils 49:791–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hymowitz T and Harlan JR (1983) Introduction of soybean to North America by Bowen, Samuel in 1765. Econ Bot 37:371–379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Knobeloch L, Salna B, Hogan A et al (2000) Blue babies and nitrate-contaminated well water. Environ Health Perspect. 108:675–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Larue TA, Patterson TG (1981) How much nitrogen do legumes fix. Adv Agron 34:15–38Google Scholar
  15. Leibovitch S, Migner P, Zhang F et al (2002) Evaluation of the effect of SoyaSignal technology on soybean yield [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] under field conditions over 6 years in eastern Canada and northern United States. J Agron Crop Sci 187(4):281–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liang Y, Cao Y, Tanaka K et al (2013) Nonlegumes respond to rhizobial Nod factors by suppressing the innate immune response. Science 341:1384–1387CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Marks BB, Megías M, Nogueira MA et al (2013) Biotechnological potential of rhizobial metabolites to enhance the performance of Bradyrhizobium japonicum and Azospirillum brasilense inoculants with the soybean and maize crops. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol Express 3:21Google Scholar
  18. Salvagiotti F, Cassman KG, Specht JE et al (2008) Nitrogen uptake, fixation and response to fertilizer N in soybeans. A review. Field Crops Res 108:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sanjuan J, Carlson RW, Spaink HP et al (1992) A 2-O-methylfucose moiety is present in the lipo-oligosaccharide nodulation signal of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:8789–8793CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Souleimanov A, Prithiviraj B, Smith DL (2002) The major Nod factor of Bradyrhizobium japonicum promotes early growth of soybean and corn. J Exp Bot 53:1929–1934CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Spaink HP, Aarts A, Stacey G et al (1992) Detection and separation of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium Nod metabolites using thin-layer chromatography. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 5:72–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Thies JE, Singleton PW, Bohlool BB (1991) Influence of size of indigenous rhizobial populations on establishment and symbiotic performance of introduced rhizobia on field-grown legumes. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:19–28PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of BiologyUniversity of Texas-Arlington, ArlingtonTexasUSA
  2. 2.Embrapa Soja, CxLondrinaBrazil

Personalised recommendations