Advertisement

A Stakeholder Approach to Media Governance

  • Anker Brink LundEmail author
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Historically, government regulation has significantly impacted the room for manoeuvre enjoyed by media managers, especially in public service media but increasingly also in privately owned firms. Currently stakeholders of many different kinds attempt to influence media industries, using a number of manipulative techniques that include censorship, subsidies and sometimes bribery as well as collective action undertaken by lobbies and nongovernment organisations (e.g. citizen interest groups). This chapter discusses the core aspects of media regulation from a European perspective because this part of the world arguably features the most complex and continuous development in these aspects. Our particular interest investigates media governance, which is not understood as an external given but considered as a premise of strategic management. It is argued that to secure an appropriate remit for an industry or firm to that guarantees a longer-term licence to operate, media managers must engage different audiences and authorities in relation to restrictive as well as prescriptive regulation. Achieving that requires approaching media governance from a stakeholder perspective, which inherently involves a broad variety of actors who can influence, and in turn may be influenced by, media operators and operations—private as well as public service based.

Keywords

Media Manager Government Regulation Media Policy Stakeholder Perspective Salient Stakeholder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alm, A., & Lowe, G. F. (2001). Managing transformation in the public polymedia enterprise: Amalgamation and synergy in Finnish public broadcasting. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 45(3), 367–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, P. (2002). Stenbeck. Stockholm: Pan Books.Google Scholar
  3. Andriof, J., et al. (2002). Unfolding stakeholder thinking. Theory, responsibility and engagement. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Barnouw, E. (1966). A tower of Babel: A history of broadcasting in the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Berg, C. E. (2013). As a matter of size. The importance of critical mass for television markets. Copenhagen: OpenAccess@CBS.Google Scholar
  6. Brunsson, N. (2002). The organization of hypocrisy: Talk, decisions and actions. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chenoweth, N. (2001). Virtual Murdoch. Reality wars on the information highway. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  8. Colling, R. (1994). Broadcasting and audio-visual policy in the European single market. London: John Libbey.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, T. E. (1998). Governing with the news: The news media as a political institution. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  10. Curran, J. (2002). Media and power. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Dimmick, J. W. (2003). Media competition and coexistence: The theory of the Niche. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Doyle, G. (2002). Understanding media economics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. European Commission. (2001). European governance—A white paper. Bruxelles: COM 428.Google Scholar
  14. Federal Trade Commission. (2003). Alcohol marketing and advertising: A report to Congress. Washington, DC: Federal Trade Commission.Google Scholar
  15. Ferguson, M. (1990). Public communication: The new imperatives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Fleisher, C. S., & Bensoussan, B. (2003). Strategic and competitive analysis: Methods and techniques for analyzing business competition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  17. Freedman, D. (2008). The politics of media policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  19. Goidel, R. K., Shields, T. G., & Peffley, M. (1997). Priming theory and RAS models. American Political Quarterly, 25, 287–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hallin, D. C., & Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems. Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hartcourt, A. (2005). The European Union and the regulation of media markets. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Horwitz, R. B. (1991). The irony of regulatory reform: The deregulation of American telecommunications. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Hoskins, C., McFadyen, S., & Finn, A. (2004). Media economics: Applying economics to new and traditional media. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Kelly, M., Mazzoleni, G., & McQuail, D. (Eds.). (2004). The media in Europe: The Euromedia handbook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Lewis, T. (1993). Empire of the air: The men who made radio. New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  26. Lund, A. B. (2004). Institutions of current affairs—Framework for comparative research in European public spheres. In F. Marcinokowski, W. A. Meier, & J. Trappel (Eds.), Media and democracy—experiences from Europe (pp. 127–140) Vienna: Haupt Verlag, 2006.Google Scholar
  27. Lund, A. B. (2006). Domesticating the Simpsons—Four types of citizenship in monitorial democracy. Politik, 9(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
  28. Lund, A. B. (2007). Media markets in Scandinavia: Political economy aspects of convergence and divergence. Nordicom Review, 28(1), 121–134.Google Scholar
  29. Lund, A. B., & Berg, C. E. (2009). Denmark, Sweden and Norway: Television diversity by duopolistic competition and co-regulation. The International Communication Gazette, 71(1–2), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lund, A. B., & Blach-Ørsten, M. (2013). Media and politics. In B. Brincker (Ed.), Introduction to political sociology (pp. 155–172). Copenhagen: Reitzel.Google Scholar
  31. Lund, A. B., & Lowe, G. F. (2013). Current challenges to public service broadcasting in the Nordic Countries. In U. Carlsson (Ed.), Public service media: Politics, markets, programming and users (pp. 51–73). Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  32. McChesney, R. W. (1993). Telecommunications, mass media, and democracy: The battle for the control of U.S. broadcasting, 1928–1935. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the twenty-first century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  34. McCombs, M., Shaw, D. L., & Weaver, D. (2007). Communication and democracy. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  35. McQuail, D. (2003). Media accountability and freedom of publication. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Noelle-Neumann, E. (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion—Our social skin. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. O’Brien, K. S., Miller, P. G., Kolt, G. S., Martens, M. P., & Webber, A. (2011). Alcohol industry and non-alcohol industry sponsorship of sportspeople and drinking. Alcohol and Alcoholism, 46, 210–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Boston: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  39. Reese, S. D. (2001). Framing public life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  40. Salovaara-Moring, I. (2009). Manufacturing Europe: Spaces of democracy, diversity and communication. Gothenburg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  41. Scannell, P., & Cardiff, D. (1991). A social history of British broadcasting: Volume 1, 1922–1939. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schoof, J., & Brown, K. (1995). Information highways and media policies in the EU. Telecommunications Policy, 19(4), 325–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  44. Spar, D. L. (2001). Ruling the waves. From the compass to the internet. New York: Harcourt.Google Scholar
  45. Svendsen, E. N. (2011). From sovereignty to liberalisation: Media policy in small European countries. In G. F. Lowe & C. S. Nissen (Eds.), Small among giants: Television broadcasting in smaller countries. Nordicom: Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  46. Thomassen, A. (2009). Navigating in the landscape of ambiguity: A stakeholder approach to the governance and management of hybrid organizations. Lund: Business Press.Google Scholar
  47. Trappel, J., Meier, W. A., D’haenens, L., Steemers, J., & Thomass, B. (2011). Media in Europe today. Bristol: Intellect.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations