Advertisement

Projectification in the Media Industries

  • Rolf A. LundinEmail author
  • Maria Norbäck
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

Since the death of the Hollywood studio system, projects have been the established way of producing content in a large part of the media industries. This includes sectors such as film and TV, advertising, electronic gaming, the recording industry, and book publishing. There seems to be an increasing trend of ‘projectification’ also in other parts of the media industries, for example, news media, which traditionally have not been organised according to a project logic. The aim of this chapter is to discuss the notion of projectification as it relates to the media industries and consider the implications this may have for media management. The chapter starts with an introduction to the general project management literature, describing its origins and development including the more recent discussion of projectification. It then turns to the media setting and discusses how content production is increasingly organised in projects and how this gives rise to what has been described as ‘project networks’ that evolve over time. Here the authors discuss what a project mode of organising means for the people set to manage media production, as well as for the individual media professional. The chapter ends with a discussion of what the trend of projectification in the media industries implies for the management of media—not only for the production of content but also for other, more strategic, endeavours.

Keywords

Project Management Media Company Media Industry Temporary Organisation Content Production 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hyperion.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen, E. (2014). Two perspectives on project management. In R. Lundin & M. Hällgren (Eds.), Advancing research on projects and temporary organizations. Copenhagen, Denmark: CBS Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aris, A. (2011). Managing media companies through the digital transition. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Aris, A., & Bughin, J. (2009). Managing media companies harnessing creative value (2nd ed.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Bergström, O. (2003). Introduction. In O. Bergström & D. Storrie (Eds.), Contingent employment in Europe and the United States. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bilton, C. (2007). Management and creativity: From creative industries to creative management. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  7. Bilton, C. (2011). The management of the creative industries. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Blair, H. (2003). Winning and losing in flexible labour markets: The formation and operation of networks of interdependence in the UK film industry. Sociology, 37(4), 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blomquist, T., Hällgren, M., Nilsson, A., & Söderholm, A. (2010). Project‐as‐practice: In search of project management research that matters. Project Management Journal, 41(1), 5–16.Google Scholar
  10. Born, G. (2004). Uncertain vision: Birt, Dyke and the reinvention of the BBC. London: Vintage.Google Scholar
  11. Chan-Olmsted, S. M. (2006). Competitive strategy for media firms. Strategic and brand management in changing media markets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  12. Christopherson, S. (2011). Connecting the dots. Structure, strategy, and subjectivity in entertainment media. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: Knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, C. H. (2011). New firms in the screen-based media industry. Startups, self-employment and standing reserve. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, C. H., Vladica, F., & Berkowitz, I. (2008). Business capabilities of small entrepreneurial media firms: Independent production of children’s television in Canada. Journal of Media Business Studies, 5(1), 9–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DeFillippi, R. (2009). Dilemmas of project-based media work: Contexts and choices. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(4), 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Deuze, M. (2007). Media work: Digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  18. Deuze, M., & Fortunati, L. (2011). Atypical newswork, atypical media management. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  19. Deuze, M., & Steward, B. (2011). Managing media work. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  20. Gareis, R. (1991). Management by projects: The management strategy of the ‘new’ project-oriented company. International Journal of Project Management, 9(2), 71–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gill, R. (2011). “LIfe is a pitch”: Managing the self in new media work. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  22. Greco, A. N. (2005). The book publishing industry (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Kerr, A. (2011). The culture of gamework. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Küng, L. (2007). Does media management matter? Establishing the scope, rationale, and future research agenda for the discipline. Journal of Media Business Studies, 4(1), 21–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Küng, L. (2008). Strategic management in the media: Theory to practice. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Küng, L. (2011). Managing strategy and maximizing innovation in media organizations. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Küng-Shankleman, L. (2000). Inside the BBC and CNN managing media organisations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Lundin, R. A., & Norbäck, M. (2009). Managing projects in the TV production industry: The case of Sweden. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(4).Google Scholar
  29. Lundin, R. A., & Söderholm, A. (2013). Temporary organizations and end states: A theory is a child of its time and in need of reconsideration and reconstruction. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 6(3), 587–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Manning, S. (2005). Managing project networks as dynamic organizational forms: Learning from the TV movie industry. International Journal of Project Management, 23, 410–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Meredith, J. R., & Mantel, S. J., Jr. (2000). Project management – A managerial approach (4th ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  32. Midler, C. (1995). “Projectification” of the firm: The Renault case. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4).Google Scholar
  33. Norbäck, M. (2012). Making public service television—A study of institutional work in collaborative TV production. Jönköping, Sweden: Jönköping University.Google Scholar
  34. Norbäck, M., & Raviola, E. (2013). Digitization of newspaper and magazine publishing: The contribution of technology to the construction of the world. In R. DeFillippi & P. Wikström (Eds.), Business innovation and disruption in publishing (Vol. 1). Media XXI Formalpress.Google Scholar
  35. Ots, M. (Ed.). (2008). Media brands and branding. Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School.Google Scholar
  36. Packendorff, J. (1995). Inquiring into the temporary organization: New directions for project management research. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 11(4), 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Perren, A. (2011). Producing filmed entertainment. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Pinney, B. W. (2001). Projects, management, and protean times: Engineering enterprise in the United States, 1870–1960, MIT. PhD thesis.Google Scholar
  39. Project Management Institute. (2013). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK Guide) (Fifth Edition).Google Scholar
  40. Randle, K. (2011). The organization of film and television production. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Raviola, E. (2010). Paper meets web: How the institution of news production works on paper and online Jönköping. JIBS dissertation series, Jönköping International Business School, ISSN 1403-0470; 065.Google Scholar
  42. Samuelsson, L. K., & Karén, F. (2013, 6 March 2013). Kvalitetsjournalistik, Svenska Dagbladet.Google Scholar
  43. Singer, J. B. (2011). Journalism in a network. In M. Deuze (Ed.), Managing media work. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  44. Söderholm, A. (2008). Project management of unexpected events. International Journal of Project Management, 26(1), 80–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Starkey, K., Barnatt, C., & Tempest, S. (2000). Beyond networks and hierarchies: Latent organizations in the U.K. television industry. Organization Science, 11(3), 299–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sullivan, M. (2013, 2013-05-04). Repairing the Credibility Cracks, The New York Times.Google Scholar
  47. Sydow, J. (2009). Path dependencies in project-based organizing: Evidence from television production in Germany. Journal of Media Business Studies, 6(4), 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sydow, J., & Staber, U. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies, 36(3), 215–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tungate, M. (2004). Media monoliths: How great media brands thrive and survive. London: UK Kogan Page Limited.Google Scholar
  50. Wikström, P. (2009). The music industry. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  51. Windeler, A., & Sydow, J. (2001). Project networks and changing industry practices collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies, 22(6), 1035–1060. doi: 10.1177/0170840601226006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Media Management and Transformation Centre, Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Gothenburg Research InstituteGothenburg UniversityGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations