Advertisement

Audience Experiences and Emotional Economy

  • Annette HillEmail author
Part of the Media Business and Innovation book series (MEDIA)

Abstract

This chapter explores trends in an emotional or experience economy as this relates to media management. The case of reality entertainment is used as an example of the tricky balancing act between the management and production of media content that has emotional resonance and audience engagement with such content. The research draws on quantitative and qualitative empirical audience data to illuminate the varying emotional and cultural values of reality entertainment talent formats within the context of the economic values of these formats. The research suggests that a reality entertainment experience is an example of emotional co-work between producers, performers and audiences. This kind of interactive media signals evolving audience practices for immersive experiences. However, a note of caution for media managers can be found in the overproduction of the tight interactivity and emotional hubs that are a feature of talent formats. Contemporary audiences are aware of the commercialisation of feelings within media industries, and as such, it is increasingly important that people can connect with content they can make their own, as shared moments or collective experiences.

Keywords

Media Content Reality Format Emotional Engagement Creative Producer Talent Format 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaker, J. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, XXXIV, 347–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albarran, A. B., & Arrese, A. (2003). Time and media markets. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  3. Bazalgette, P. (2005). Billion Dollar Game: How three men risked it all and changed the face of Television. Britain: Time Warner Books.Google Scholar
  4. Bolin, G. (2011). Value and the media: Cultural production and consumption in digital markets. London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, R., & Haynes, R. (2009). Power play: Sport, the media and popular culture (2nd ed.). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantrell, T., & Luckhurst, M. (2010). Playing for real: Actors on playing real people. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, B. (2014, March 21) Once a hit, it’s ratings make idol an also-ran. The New York Times, 22.Google Scholar
  8. Glynn, K. (2000). Tabloid culture: Trash taste, popular power and the transformation of television. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Halperin, S. (2013, May 17) American idol finale’s ratings free fall: what went wrong. The Hollywood Reporter, 4.Google Scholar
  10. Herman, J. (2012, 18th May). American idol castoff Joshua Ledet talks favourite moments. Hollywood Reporter. Accessed online, http://www.hollywoodreporter.com/idol-worship/american-idol-joshua-ledet-phillip-phillips-326691.
  11. Hill, A. (2005). Reality TV: Audiences and popular factual television. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hill, A. (2007). Restyling factual TV, audiences of news, documentary and reality genres. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, A. (2011). Paranormal media: Audiences, spirits and magic in popular culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, A., Steemers, J. (2011). Big formats. Small nations: Does size matter? In G. Lowe, N. Christian, and P. Robert (Eds.), Why size matters. Gothenberg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  15. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: The commercialisation of human feeling. Berkely: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  16. Hochschild, A. (2003). The commercialisation of intimate life: Notes from home and work. Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  17. Kilborn, R. (2003). Staging the real. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kraidy, M., & Sender, K. (Eds.). (2011). The politics of reality television: Global perspectives. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Krøvel, R. (2012). We love to hate each other. Mediated football fan culture. Gothenberg: Nordicom.Google Scholar
  20. Lipkin, S. N. (2002). Real emotional logic: Film and television docudrama as persuasive practice. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Napoli, P. (2010). Audience evolution. NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Oren, T., & Shahaf, S. (2012). Global television formats. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Paget, D., & Roscoe, J. (2006). Giving voice performance and authenticity in the documentary musical. Jump Cut: A Review of Contemporary Media, 48(Winter). Online, Accessed 19 June 2012. http://www.ejumpcut.org/archive/jc48.2006/MusicalDocy/text.html.
  24. Pine, J., & Gilmore, J. (2011). The experience economy (1999 updated edition). Boston: Harvard Business Review.Google Scholar
  25. Rosen, J (2006, 30 June). The people formerly known as the audience. Huffington Post. Accessed 21 June 2014 http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jay-rosen/the-people-formerly-known_1_b_24113.html.
  26. Sheller, M., & Urry, J. (2004). Tourism mobilities: Places to play, places in play. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Stelter, B. (2012). Idol Grapples with its own competition. New York Times. Accessed May 22, from www.nytimes.com/2012/05/23/arts/television/American-idol-ponders-a-ratings-dip-on-fox.html?_r=o
  28. Zelizer, V. (2005). The purchase of intimacy. New York: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Communication and MediaLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations