Advertisement

Computational Simulation of Three-Dimensional Behaviour of Chemical Dissolution-Front Instability in Fluid-Saturated Porous Media

  • Chongbin ZhaoEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Earth System Sciences book series (LNESS)

Abstract

Numerical simulation of chemical dissolution-front instability in fluid-saturated porous media is an important topic in the field of computational geosciences, which is a beautiful marriage between the contemporary computational mechanics and traditional geosciences. If fresh water is injected into a fluid-saturated porous medium with the solute (i.e. chemical-species) being in an equilibrium state, it can break the equilibrium state of the solute so that the whole system becomes chemically far from equilibrium. To drive the system towards a new chemical equilibrium state, the solid part of the solute is dissolved within the porous medium. This process causes an increase in the porosity of the porous medium. The resulting porosity increase can cause a corresponding increase in the permeability of the medium so that the pore-fluid flow can be enhanced within the porous medium. This means that both permeability and diffusivity are dependent on the porosity of a porous medium (Bear 1972). When the injected fresh water flow is relatively weak, the chemical dissolution front is stable so that a planar chemical dissolution-front remains the planar shape during its propagation within the porous medium. However, when the injected fresh water flow is strong enough, the chemical dissolution front becomes unstable. In this case, a planar chemical dissolution-front can be changed into a complicated and complex morphology during its propagation within the porous medium. This is the scientific problem, known as the chemical dissolution-front instability problem in the fluid-saturated porous medium, to be considered in this investigation. It is noted that there is another mechanism that can also cause pore-fluid channeling instability due to the rheological asymmetry associated with compaction and decompaction in ductile rocks (Connolly and Podladchikov 2007). This instability is closely associated with porosity waves and can be referred to as the mechanical instability. Owing to a significant mechanism difference between a chemical dissolution instability problem and a mechanical instability one, this chapter focuses on the consideration of chemical dissolution instability problems. However, a possible interaction between these two different mechanisms may need to be considered in a future investigation.

Keywords

Porous Medium Chemical Dissolution Couple Nonlinear Equation Couple Nonlinear System Fresh Water Flow 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Appold MS, Garven G (2000) Reactive flow models of ore formation in the Southeast Missouri district. Econ Geol Bull Soc Econ Geol 95:1605–1626Google Scholar
  2. Bear J (1972) Dynamics of fluids in porous media. American Elsevier Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Chadam J, Hoff D, Merino E, Ortoleva P, Sen A (1986) Reactive infiltration instabilities. IMA J Appl Math 36:207–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chadam J, Ortoleva P, Sen A (1988) A weekly nonlinear stability analysis of the reactive infiltration interface. IMA J Appl Math 48:1362–1378Google Scholar
  5. Chen JS, Liu CW (2002) Numerical simulation of the evolution of aquifer porosity and species concentrations during reactive transport. Comput Geosci 28:485–499CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Connolly JAD, Podladchikov YY (2007) Decompaction weakening and channeling instability in ductile porous media: implications for asthenospheric melt segregation. J Geophys Res 112(B10205):1–15Google Scholar
  7. Everett CE, Wilkinson JJ, Rye DM (1999) Fracture-controlled fluid flow in the Lower Palaeozoic basement rocks of Ireland: implications for the genesis of Irish-type Zn–Pb deposits. In: McCaffrey KJW, Lonergan L, Wilkinson JJ (eds) Fractures, fluid flow and mineralization, vol 155. Geological Society, London, pp 247–276 (Special Publications)Google Scholar
  8. Ferry JM (1996) Prograde and retrograde fluid flow during contact metamorphism of siliceous carbonate rocks from the Ballachulish aureole Scotland. Contrib Miner Petrol 124:235–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fluid Dynamics International (1997) Fluid dynamics analysis package: FIDAP. Fluid Dynamics International Inc, IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  10. Garven G, Appold MS, Topygina VI, Hazlett TJ (1999) Hydrologic modeling of the genesis of carbonate-hosted lead–zinc ores. Hydrogeol J 7:108–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gow P, Upton P, Zhao C, Hill K (2002) Copper–gold mineralization in the New Guinea: numerical modeling of collision, fluid flow and intrusion-related hydrothermal systems. Aust J Earth Sci 49:753–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Heinrich W, Hoffbauer R, Hubberten HW (1995) Contrasting fluid flow patterns at the Bufa del Diente contact metamorphic aureole, north-east Mexico: evidence from stable isotopes. Contrib Miner Petrol 119:362–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hitzmann MW (1995) Mineralisation in the Irish Zn–Pb–(Ba–Ag) Orefield. In: Anderson K, Ashton J, Earls G, Hitzman M, Tear S (eds) Irish Carbonate-hosted deposits. Society of Economic Geologists, Guidebook Series, vol 21, pp 25–61 Google Scholar
  14. Klein C, Beukes NJV (1992) Proterozoic iron-formation. In: Kondie KC (ed) Proterozoic crustal evolution. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  15. Morris RCV (1980) A textural and mineralogical study of the relationship of iron ore to banded iron-formation in the Hamersley Iron Province of Western Australia. Econ Geol 75:184–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nield DA, Bejan A (1992) Convection in porous media. Springer-Verlag, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ord A, Hobbs BE, Zhang Y, Broadbent GC, Brown M, Willetts G, Sorjonen-Ward P, Walshe J, Zhao C (2002) Geodynamic modelling of the century deposit, Mt Isa Province, Queensland. Aust J Earth Sci 49:1011–1039CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ormond A, Ortoleva P (2000) Numerical modeling of reaction-induced cavities in a porous rock. J Geophys Res 105:16737–16747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ortoleva P, Chadam J, Merino E, Sen A (1987) Geochemical self-organization. II: The reactive-infiltration instability. Am J Sci 287:1008–1040CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Phillips OM (1991) Flow and reactions in permeable rocks. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Raffensperger JP, Garven G (1995) The formation of unconformity-type uranium ore deposits: coupled hydrochemical modelling. Am J Sci 295:639–696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schaubs P, Zhao C (2002) Numerical modelling of gold-deposit formation in the Bendigo-Ballarat zone, Victoria. Aust J Earth Sci 49:1077–1096CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Scheidegger AE (1974) The physics of flow through porous media. University of Toronto Press, TorontoGoogle Scholar
  24. Simms MA, Garven G (2004) Thermal convection in faulted extensional sedimentary basins: theoretical results from finite-element modeling. Geofluids 4:109–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Steefel CI, Lasaga AC (1990) Evolution of dissolution patterns: permeability change due to coupled flow and reaction. In: Melchior DC, Basset RL Chemical modeling in aqueous systems II. American Chemistry Society Symposium Series, vol 416. pp 213–225Google Scholar
  26. Steefel CI, Lasaga AC (1994) A coupled model for transport of multiple chemical species and kinetic precipitation/dissolution reactions with application to reactive flow in single phase hydrothermal systems. Am J Sci 294:529–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wilde AR, Wall VJ (1987) Geology of the Nabarlek Uranium deposit, Northern-territory, Australia. Econ Geol 82:1152–1168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Xu TF, Samper J, Ayora C, Manzano M, Custodio E (1999) Modelling of non-isothermal multi-component reactive transport in field scale porous media flow systems. J Hydrol 214:144–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Xu TF, Apps JA, Pruess K (2004) Numerical simulation of CO2 disposal by mineral trapping in deep aquifers. Appl Geochem 19:917–936CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Yang J, Large RR, Bull SW (2004) Factors controlling free thermal convection in faults in sedimentary basins: implications for the formation of zinc–lead mineral deposits. Geofluids 4:237–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Yeh GT, Tripathi VS (1991) A model for simulating transport of reactive multispecies components: model development and demonstration. Water Resour Res 27:3075–3094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zhao C, Mühlhaus HB, Hobbs BE (1997) Finite element analysis of steady-state natural convection problems in fluid-saturated porous media heated from below. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 21:863–881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Mühlhaus HB (1998) Finite element modelling of temperature gradient driven rock alteration and mineralization in porous rock masses. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 165:175–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Mühlhaus HB, Ord A (1999) Finite element analysis of flow patterns near geological lenses in hydrodynamic and hydrothermal systems. Geophys J Int 138:146–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Mühlhaus HB, Ord A (2000) Finite element modelling of dissipative structures for nonequilibrium chemical reactions in fluid-saturated porous media. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 184:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zhao C, Lin G, Hobbs BE, Mühlhaus HB, Ord A, Wang, Y (2001) Finite element modelling of heat transfer through permeable cracks in hydrothermal systems with upward throughflow. In: Engineering computations, vol 18, pp 996–1011Google Scholar
  37. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Hornby P, Ord A, Peng S, Liu L (2008a) Theoretical and numerical analyses of chemical dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 32:1107–1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Ord A, Hornby P, Peng S (2008b) Morphological evolution of three-dimensional chemical-dissolution front in fluid-saturated porous media: a numerical simulation approach. Geofluids 8:113–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Ord A, Hornby P, Peng S (2008c) Effect of reactive surface areas associated with different particle shapes on chemical dissolution front instability in fluid-saturated porous rocks. Transp Porous Media 73:75–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhao C, Hobbs BE, Ord A (2009) Fundamentals of computational geoscience: numerical methods and algorithms. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhao C, Reid LB, Regenauer-Lieb K, Poulet T (2012) A porosity-gradient replacement approach for computational simulation of chemical-dissolution front propagation in fluid-saturated porous media including pore-fluid compressibility. Comput Geosci 16:735–755CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zienkiewicz OC (1977) The finite element method. McGraw-Hill, LondonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Geosciences Research CentreCentral South UniversityChangshaChina

Personalised recommendations