Skip to main content

Packaging and Quality

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science ((BRIEFSCHEFO))

Abstract

Food packaging has to comply with complex requirements: functional implications, need of detailed information, regulatory obligations, impact on the environment. The disposal stage of packaging materials concerns many aspects, from the edible content (when it is not consumed) to the ‘tertiary packaging’ unit (it comprehends ‘m’ secondary packaging and ‘n’ packaged products). Best environmental strategies appear the numerical reduction of packaging components, the use of mono-material packages and the concomitant definition of ‘ecodesign guidelines’. Consequently, recycling can be simplified and the possible reuse of recovered matters for food applications may be workable because of the limitation of chemical contamination. On the other side, economic worries and the full compliance with food safety requirements should be taken into account in the design step. The realisation of environmentally sustainable and food-contact approved packaging can be very challenging for all involved players.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

BPG:

Best practice guideline

ETP:

Electrolytic tin plate

FM:

Food manufacturer

FP:

Food packaging

FPP:

Food packaging producer

GCC:

Ground calcium carbonate

IFP:

Integrated food product

MPU:

Macro packaging unit

MAP:

Modified atmosphere packaging

PCC:

Precipitated calcium carbonate

RSL:

Remaining shelf life

SPU:

Secondary packaging unit

SDS:

Sodium stearate

References

  1. Italian Institute of Packaging (2013) Linee guida per la valutazione dell’idoneità al contatto con alimenti del packaging realizzato con materiale proveniente da riciclo. The Italian Institute of Packaging, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eurostat (2013) Packaging waste statistics. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Packaging_waste_statistics. Accessed 17 Dec 2013

  3. Barbero S, Cozzo B (2009) Ecodesign. H. F Ullmann, Königswinter

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vollmer A, Biedermann M, Grundböck F, Ingenhoff J-E, Biedermann-Brem S, Altkofer W, Grob K (2011) Migration of mineral oil from printed paperboard into dry foods: survey of the German market. Eur Food Res Technol 232:175–182. doi:10.1007/s00217-010-1376-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Tamborrini P (2009) Design sostenibile. Oggetti, sistemi e comportamenti. Electa, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hanss D, Böhm G (2012) Sustainability seen from the perspective of consumers. Int J Consum Stud 36(6):678–687. doi:10.1111/j.1470-6431.2011.01045.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Parisi S (2012) Food packaging and food alterations: the user-oriented approach. Smithers Rapra Technology, Shawbury

    Google Scholar 

  8. Marsh K, Bugusu B (2007) Food packaging—roles, materials, and environmental issues. J Food Sci 72(3):39–55. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00301.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Manzini E, Vezzoli C (1998) Lo sviluppo di prodotti sostenibili. I requisiti ambientali dei prodotti industriali. Maggioli, Rimini

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tamborrini P, Barbero S (eds) (2013) Il Fare Ecologico. Il prodotto industriale e i suoi requisiti ambientali. Edizione Ambiente, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  11. Iggesund Paperboard AB (2006) Iggesund Paperboard Reference Manual. 4. Printing and converting performance. http://www.iggesund.com/Global/Iggesund%20documents/Paperboard%20documents/Iggesund%20Anchor%20Material/Reference%20manual/Reference%20manual%20Printing%20and%20converting%20performance.PDF. Accessed 03 Feb 2014

  12. Vera P, Aznar M, Mercea P, Nerín C (2011) Study of hotmelt adhesives used in food packaging multilayer laminates. Evaluation of the main factors affecting migration to food. J Mater Chem 21:420–431. doi:10.1039/c0jm02183k

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gill RA Sr, Haskins WJ, Ingram EL (2002) New developments in PCC offer board improvements with economy. Pap Board Ind 2(4):30–31. http://www.specialtyminerals.com/fileadmin/user_upload/smi/Publications/S-PA-AT-PB-57.pdf. Accessed 03 Feb 2014

  14. Grönfors J (2010) Use of fillers in paper and paperboard grades. Thesis Dissertation, Tampere University of Applied Sciences. http://www.theseus.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/16226/Gronfors_Jarkko.pdf?sequence=1. Accessed 03 Feb 2014

  15. Ding H, Lu SC, Deng YX, Du GX (2007) Mechano-activated surface modification of calcium carbonate in wet stirred mill and its properties. Trans Nonferrous Met Soc China 17(5):1100–1104. doi:10.1016/s1003-6326(07)60232-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Onusseit H (2006) The influence of adhesives on recycling. Res. Cons. Recyc. 46(2):168–181. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Parisi S (2004) Alterazioni in imballaggi metallici termicamente processati. Gulotta Press, Palermo

    Google Scholar 

  18. Micali M, Parisi S, Minutoli E, Delia S, Laganà P (2009) Alimenti confezionati e atmosfera modificata. Caratteristiche basilari, nuove procedure, applicazioni pratiche. Ind Aliment 489:35–43

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gorny JR (1997) A summary of CA and MAP requirements and recommendations for fresh-cut (minimally processed) fruits and vegetables. In: Gorny JR (ed) Proceedings of seventh international controlled atmosphere conference, vol 5., Postharvest Outreach ProgramUniversity of California, Davis, pp 30–66

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mattos LM, Moretti CL, Ferriera MD (2012) Modified atmosphere packaging for perishable plant products. In: Dogan F (ed) Polypropylene, ISBN: 978-953-51-0636-4, InTech. http://www.intechopen.com/books/polypropylene/modified-atmosphere-for-perishable-plant-products. Accessed 30 Feb 2014

  21. Hotchkiss JH (1995) Safety considerations in active packaging. In: Rooney ML (ed) Active food packaging. Springer, Dordrecht, p 239. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-2175-4_11

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ciravegna E (2010) La qualità del packaging. Franco Angeli, Milan

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boylston S (2009) Designing sustainable packaging. Laurence King Publishing Ltd., London

    Google Scholar 

  24. Bistagnino L (ed) (2011) Systemic design: designing the productive and environmental sustainability. Slow Food Editore, Bra. ISBN: 9788884992796

    Google Scholar 

  25. Germak C (2008) Man at the centre of the project. Allemandi, Torino

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bublitz MG, Peracchio LA, Andreasen AR, Kees J, Kidwell B, Miller EG, Motley CM, Peter PC, Rajagopal P, Scott ML, Vallen B (2013) Promoting positive change: advancing the food well-being paradigm. J Bus Res 66(8):1211–1218. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.08.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanni Brunazzi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brunazzi, G., Parisi, S., Pereno, A. (2014). Packaging and Quality. In: The Importance of Packaging Design for the Chemistry of Food Products. SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08452-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics