Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Societal Responses to Sexual Violence Against Women: Rape Myths and the “Real Rape” Stereotype

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration

Abstract

Sexual violence is an omnipresent threat to women’s sexual well-being, physical and mental health all over the world. In addition to the impact of the victimization experience itself, many survivors are faced with negative social reactions when they disclose it to third parties, which amount to a form of secondary victimization and differ from reactions toward victims of other forms of violent crime. Negative reactions and stereotypic judgments about victims of sexual violence can also be found to operate in the legal handling of sexual violence allegations, playing a part in the widely observed “justice gap” for victims of sexual assault. This chapter examines the role of stereotypes and myths about rape in understanding societal responses to survivors of sexual violence. After presenting prevalence rates of sexual assault worldwide, the process of attrition is examined, from the occurrence of a sexual assault to the potential conviction of a perpetrator in a court trial. A large body of international research shows that attrition may be linked to the influence of extra-legal factors, particularly the tendency to blame the victim and exonerate the perpetrator, which reflect socially shared myths and stereotypes about rape. Evidence will be presented showing the impact of rape myths and stereotypes on the handling of rape complaints by members of the criminal justice system and by the general public. The chapter concludes with a review of potential strategies for challenging rape myths and stereotypes and reducing their influence in the criminal justice system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.thisisnotaninvitationtorapeme.co.uk/; http://www.mumsnet.com/campaigns/we-believe-you-campaign-rape-myths-busted.

References

  • Abrahams, N., Devries, K., Watts, C., Pallitto, C., Petzold, M., Shamu, S., et al. (2014). Worldwide prevalence of non-partner sexual violence: A systematic review. The Lancet, 383(9929), 1648–1654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aebi, M. F., Aromaa, K., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., Barclay, G.,Gruszczyñska, B., von Hofer, H., et al. (2006). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics (3rd ed.). Retrieved February 22, 2016, from: http://wp.unil.ch/europeansourcebook/printed-editions-2/third-edition.

  • Aebi, M. F., Aubusson de Cavarlay, B., Barclay G., Gruszczyńska, B., Harrendorf, S., Heiskanen, M., et al. (2010). European sourcebook of crime and criminal justice statistics (4th ed.). Retrieved February 22, 2016, from: http://wp.unil.ch/europeansourcebook/printed-editions-2/printed-editions.

  • Alderden, M. A., & Ullman, S. E. (2012a). Creating a more complete and current picture: Examining police and prosecutor decision-making when processing sexual assault cases. Violence against Women, 18, 525–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alderden, M. A., & Ullman, S. E. (2012b). Gender difference or indifference? Detective decision making in sexual assault cases. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anders, M. C., & Christopher, F. S. (2011). A socioecological model of rape survivors’ decisions to aid in case prosecution. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 35, 92–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, I. (2007). What is a typical rape? Effects of victim and participant gender in female and male rape perception. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46, 225–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K. B., Cooper, H., & Okamura, L. (1997). Individual differences and attitudes toward rape: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 295–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ask, K. (2010). A survey of police officers’ and prosecutors’ beliefs about crime victim behaviors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 1132–1149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basile, K. C. (2002). Attitudes toward wife rape: Effects of social background and victim status. Violence and Victims, 17, 341–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basow, S. A., & Minieri, A. (2011). “You owe me”: Effects of date cost, who pays, participant gender, and rape myth beliefs on perceptions of rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 479–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-David, S., & Schneider, O. (2005). Rape perceptions, gender role attitudes, and victim-perpetrator acquaintance. Sex Roles, 53, 385–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieneck, S. (2009). How adequate is the vignette technique as a research tool in psycho-legal research? In M. E. Oswald, S. Bieneck, & J. Hupfeld-Heinemann (Eds.), The social psychology of punishment of crime (pp. 277–271). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieneck, S., & Krahé, B. (2011). Blaming the victim and exonerating the perpetrator in cases of rape and robbery: Is there a double standard? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26, 1785–1797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branscombe, N. R., & Weir, J. A. (1992). Resistance as stereotype inconsistency: Consequences for judgments of rape victims. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 11, 80–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M., Hamilton, C., & O’Neill, D. (2007). Characteristics associated with rape attrition and the role played by scepticism or legal rationality by investigators and prosecutors. Psychology, Crime & Law, 13, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Horvath, M. (2009). Do you believe her and is it really rape? In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape - Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 325–342). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. M., & King, J. (1998). Gender differences in police officers’ attitudes towards rape: Results of an exploratory study. Psychology, Crime and Law, 4, 265–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Sefl, T., Barnes, H. E., Ahrens, C. E., Wasco, S. M., & Zaragoza-Diesfeld, Y. (1999). Community services for rape survivors: Enhancing psychological well-being or increasing trauma? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 847–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Wasco, S. M., Ahrens, C. E., Sefl, T., & Barnes, H. E. (2001). Preventing the “second rape”: Rape survivors experiences with community service providers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 1239–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chudasama, R. K., Kadri, A, M,, Zalavadiya, D., Joshi, N., Bhola, C., & Verma, M. (2013). Attitude and myths towards rape among medical students in Rajkot, India. Online Journal of Health and Allied Sciences, 12, 16. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from: http://www.ojhas.org/issue47/2013-3-4.html.

  • Cohn, A. M., Zinzow, H. M., Resnick, H. S., & Kilpatrick, D. G. (2013). Correlates of reasons for not reporting rape to police: Results from a national telephone household probability sample of women with forcible or drug-or-alcohol facilitated/incapacitated rape. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 455–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crown Prosecution Service (2014). Violence against women and girls. Crime report 2013-2014. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from: http://www.cps.gov.uk/data/violence_against_women/vawg_2013_14_report.html.

  • Daly, K., & Bouhours, B. (2010). Rape and attrition in the legal process: A comparative analysis of five countries. Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, 39, 565.650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deitz, S. R., Blackwell, K. T., Daley, P. C., & Bentley, B. J. (1982). Measurement of empathy toward rape victims and rapists. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 372–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devries, K. M., Mak, J. Y. T., García-Moreno, C., Petzold, M., Child, J. C., Falder, G., et al. (2013). The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science, 340(6140), 1527–1528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earnshaw, V. A., Pitpitan, E. V., & Chaudoir, S. R. (2011). Intended responses to rape as functions of attitudes, attributions of fault, and emotions. Sex Roles, 64, 382–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, K. M., Turchik, J. A., Dardis, C. M., Reynolds, N., & Gidycz, C. A. (2011). Rape myths: History, individual and institutional-level presence, and implications for change. Sex Roles, 65, 761–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009a). Turning mirrors into windows? Assessing the impact of (mock) juror education in rape trials. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 363–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison, L., & Munro, V. E. (2009b). Reacting to rape: Exploring mock jurors’ assessments of complainant credibility. British Journal of Criminology, 49, 202–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felson, R. B., & Paré, P. P. (2005). The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 597–610.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch, E., & Munro, V. E. (2005). Juror stereotypes and blame attribution in rape cases involving intoxicants. British Journal of Criminology, 45, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, B. S., Daigle, L. E., Cullen, F. T., & Turner, M. G. (2003). Reporting sexual victimization to the police and others: Results from a national-level study of college women. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 30, 6–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Neuberg, S. L. (1990). A continuum of impression formation, from category-based to individuating processes: Influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, P. A., & Haney, B. (1996). Sexual assault cases in the legal system: Police, prosecutor, and victim perspectives. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 607–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemberling, T. M., & Cramer, R. J. (2014). Expert testimony on sensitive myth-ridden topics: Ethics and recommendations for psychological professionals. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45, 120–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerger, H., Kley, H., Bohner, G., & Siebler, F. (2007). The Acceptance of Modern Myths About Sexual Aggression (AMMSA) Scale: Development and validation in German and English. Aggressive Behavior, 33, 422–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. M. (2006). Rape myth beliefs and prejudiced instructions; Effects on decisions of guilt in a case of date rape. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannon, R., Hall, D. S., Kuntz, T., Van Laar, S., & Williams, J. (1995). Dating characteristics leading to unwanted vs. wanted sexual behavior. Sex Roles, 33, 767–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, D. (2014). Repräsentativbefragung zu Viktimisierungserfahrungen in Deutschland. Hannover: Kriminologisches Forschungsinstitut Niedersachen. Retrieved September 1, 2014, from: www.kfn.de/versions/kfn/assets/fob122.pdf.

  • Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) and Her Majesty’s Inspectorate for the Crown Prosecution Service (HMCPSI) (2012). Forging the links: Rape investigation and prosecution. Retrieved August 14, 2014, http://www.hmic.gov.uk/publication/forging-the-links-rape-investigation-and-prosecution/.

  • Home Office (2010). The Stern Review. A report by Baroness Vivien Stern CBE of an independent review into how rape complaints are handled by public authorities in England and Wales. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from: http://www.equalities.gov.uk/pdf/Stern_Review_of_Rape_Reporting_1FINAL.pdf.

  • Horvath, M. A. H., Tong, S., & Williams, E. (2011). Critical issues in rape investigation: An overview of reform in England and Wales. The Journal of Criminal Justice Research, 1(2), 1–18. Retrieved February 22,2016, from: http://eprints.mdx.ac.uk/6983/4/Horvath%252C%2520Tong%2520%2526%2520Williams%2520%25282011%2529.pdf.

  • Jehle, J. M. (2012). Attrition and conviction rates of sexual offences in Europe: Definitions and criminal justice responses. European Journal of Criminal Policy and Research, 18, 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, J. (2004). Beyond belief? Police, rape, and women’s credibility. Criminal Justice, 4, 29–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahlor, L., & Morrison, D. (2007). Television viewing and rape myth acceptance among college women. Sex Roles, 56, 729–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. S., Mathie, V. A., & Torgler, C. (1994). Rape scripts and rape acknowledgement. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 53–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamal, A., Shaikh, A. I., & Shaikh, M. A. (2010). Comparative analysis of attitudes and perceptions about rape among male and female university students. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad, 22, 108–110. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from ayubmed.edu.pk/JAMC/PAST/22-2/Anila.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, G., Drevland, G. C. B., Wessel, E., Overskeid, G., & Magnussen, S. (2003). The importance of being earnest: Displayed emotions and witness credibility. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, L., Temkin, J. and Griffiths, S. (2006). Section 41: An evaluation of new legislation limiting sexual history evidence in rape trials. London: Home Office Online Report 20/06. Retrieved September 20, 2014, from: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130128103514/http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs06/rdsolr2006.pdf.

  • Kelly, L., Horvarth, M., Uzelac, G, Lovett, J. (2007). Rape in the 21st century: Old behaviours, new contexts and emerging patterns. Full Research Report ESRC End of Award Report, RES-000-22-1679. Swindon: ESRC. Retrieved August 15, 2014, from: http://www.esds.ac.uk/doc/5827%5Cmrdoc%5Cpdf%5C5827userguide.pdf.

  • Kilpatrick, D. G., Resnick, H. S., Ruggiero, K. J., Conoscenti, L. M., & McCauley, J. (2007). Drug-facilitated, incapacitated, and forcible rape: A national study. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice. Retrieved September 1, 2014, from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/219181.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klippenstine, M. A., & Schuller, R. (2012). Perceptions of sexual assault: Expectancies regarding the emotional response of a rape victim over time. Psychology, Crime & Law, 18, 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P. (2006). Restoring rape survivors. Justice, advocacy, and a call for action. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 206–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koss, M. P., Bachar, K. J., Hopkins, C. Q., & Carlson, C. (2004). Expanding a community’s justice response to sex crimes through advocacy, prosecutorial, and public health collaboration: Introducing the RESTORE program. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1435–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1985). Verantwortungszuschreibungen in der sozialen Eindrucksbildung über Vergewaltigungsopfer und -täter. Gruppendynamik, 16, 169–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1988). Victim and observer characteristics as determinants of responsibility attributions to victims of rape. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 50–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1991a). Police officers’ definitions of rape: A prototype study. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 223–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B. (1991b). Social psychological issues in the study of rape. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 279–309). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., & Temkin, J. (2009). Addressing the attitude problem in rape trials: Some proposals and methodological considerations. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 301–321). Cullompton, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Temkin, J., & Bieneck, S. (2007). Schema-driven information processing in judgments about rape. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 601–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krahé, B., Temkin, J., Bieneck, S., & Berger, A. (2008). Prospective lawyers’ rape stereotypes and schematic decision-making about rape cases. Psychology, Crime & Law, 14, 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippner, S., Pitchford, D. B., & Davies, J. (2012). Post-traumatic stress disorder. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1999). Social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • LaFree, G. D. (1981). Official reactions to social problems: Police decisions in sexual assault cases. Social Problems, 28, 581–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langton, L., Berzofsky, M., Krebs, C., & Smiley-McDonald, H. (2012). Victimizations not reported to the police, 2006-2010. National Crime Victimization Survey, Special Report, ncj 238536. Retrieved August 11, 2014, from: http://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ascii/vnrp0610.txt.

  • Lea, S. J., Lanvers, U., & Shaw, S. (2003). Attrition in rape cases: Developing a profile and identifying relevant factors. British Journal of Criminology, 43, 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. C., & Hazelwood, R. R. (1985). Police attitudes and beliefs toward rape. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 13, 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Lee, C., & Lee, W. (2012). Attitudes toward women, rape myths, and rape perceptions among male police officers in South Korea. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 365–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13, 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littleton, H., Rhatigan, D. L., & Axom, D. (2007). Unacknowledged rape: How much do we know about the hidden rape victim? Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, 14, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lonsway, K. A. (2005). The use of expert witnesses in cases involving sexual assault. Violence against Women Online Resources. Retrieved October 12, 2007, from: http://www.mincava.umn.edu/documents/commissioned/svandexpertwitnesses/svandexpertwitnesses.pdf.

  • Lonsway, K. A., & Archambault, J. (2012). The “Justice Gap” for sexual assault cases: Future directions for research and reform. Violence Against Women, 18, 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovett, J., & Kelly, L. (2009). Different systems – similar outcomes? Tracking attrition in reported rape cases across Europe. Retrieved August 12, 2014, from: http://www.cwasu.org/publication_display.asp?pageid=PAPERS&type=1&pagekey=44&year=2009.

  • Luginbuhl, J., & Mullin, C. (1981). Rape and responsibility: How and how much is the victim blamed? Sex Roles, 7, 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCrae, C. N., & Shepard, J. W. (1989). Sex differences in the perception of rape victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 4, 278–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C. (2011). Police empathy and victim PTSD as potential factors in rape case attrition. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 26, 112–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddox, L., Lee, D., & Barker, C. (2012). The impact of psychological consequences of rape on rape case attrition: The police perspective. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 27, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. L., Macy, R. J., & Young, S. K. (2011). Health and economic consequences of sexual violence. In: J. W. White, M. P. Koss, A. E. Kazdin (Eds.), Violence against women and children (Vol. 1: Mapping the terrain, pp. 173–195). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKimmie, B. M., Masser, B. M., & Bongiorno, R. (2014). What counts as rape? The effect of offense prototypes, victim stereotypes, and participant gender on how the complainant and defendant are perceived. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29, 2273–2303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. K., Amacker, A. M., & King, A. R. (2011). Sexual victimization history and perceived similarity to a sexual assault victim: A path model of perceiver variables predicting victim culpability attributions. Sex Roles, 64, 372–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice, Home Office and the Office for National Statistics (2013). An overview of sexual offending in England and Wales: Statistics bulletin. Retrieved August 11, 2014, https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/214970/sexual-offending-overview-jan-2013.pdf.

  • Nayak, M. B., Byrne, C. A., Martin, M. K., & Abraham, A. G. (2003). Attitudes toward violence against women: A cross-nation study. Sex Roles, 49, 333–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Keefe, S., Brown, J. M., & Lyons, E. (2009). Seeking proof or truth? Naturalistic decision-making by police officers when considering rape allegations. In M. Horvath & J. Brown (Eds.), Rape: Challenging contemporary thinking (pp. 229–254). Cullompton, UK: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. D. (2007). Behind the blue line: Investigating police officers’ attitudes toward rape. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 22, 22–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. D. (2010). True colors: Police officers and rape myth acceptance. Feminist Criminology, 5, 315–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (1992). Explaining the evidence: Tests of the story model for juror decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perilloux, C., Duntley, J. D., & Buss, D. M. (2014). Blame attribution in sexual victimization. Personality and Individual Differences, 63, 81–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, P. (1992). Judgements about victims and attackers in depicted rapes: A review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 307–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, K., & Seffrin, P. (2012). Police interviews of sexual assault reports: Do attitudes matter? Violence and Victims, 27, 263–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, K., & Seffrin, P. (2013). Police officers’ collaboration with rape victim advocates: Barriers and facilitators. Violence and Victims, 28, 681–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Sánchez, M., Megiás, J. L., & Krahé, B. (2012). The role of alcohol and victim sexual interest in Spanish students’ perceptions of sexual assault. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 2230–2258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, V. M., & Randall, S. C. (1982). The impact of investigator perceptions of victim legitimacy on the processing of rape/sexual assault cases. Symbolic Interaction, 5, 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R. A., & Hastings, P. A. (2002). Complainant sexual history evidence: Its impact on mock jurors’ decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 252–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R., & Klippenstine, M. A. (2004). The impact of complainant sexual history evidence on jurors’ decisions: Considerations from a psychological perspective. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 10, 321–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R. A., & Stewart, A. (2000). Police responses to sexual assault complaints: The role of perpetrator/complainant intoxication. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R. A., & Wall, A. M. (1998). The effects of defendant and complainant intoxication on mock jurors’ judgments of sexual assault. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 22, 555–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 713–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleath, E., & Bull, R. (2012). Comparing rape victim and perpetrator blaming in a police officer sample. Differences between police officers with and without special training. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 646–665.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Coleman, K., Eder, S., & Hall, P. (Eds.) (2011). Homicides, firearm offences and intimate violence 2009/10. Supplementary Volume 2 to Crime in England and Wales 2009/10. London: Home Office Statistical Bulletin HOS 01/11. Retrieved August 3, 2014, from: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publications/science-research-statistics/research-statistics/crime-research/hosb0111/hosb0111?view=Binary.

  • Spanos, N. P., Dubreuil, S. C., & Gwynn, M. I. (1991–92). The effects of expert testimony concerning rape on the verdicts and beliefs of mock jurors. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 11, 37-51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, K., & Siegel, J. T. (2013). Victim responsibility, credibility, and verdict in a simulated rape case: Application of Weiner’s attribution model. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 18, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., & Tellis, K. (2012). The criminal justice system’s response to sexual violence. Violence against Women, 18, 169–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starzynski, L. L., Ullman, S. E., Filipas, H. H., & Townsend, S. M. (2005). Correlates of women’s sexual assault disclosure to informal and formal support sources. Violence and Victims, 20, 417–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, M. W., Dobbin, S. A., & Gatowski, S. I. (1996). “Real rapes” and “real victims”: The shared reliance on common cultural definitions of rape. Feminist Legal Studies, 4, 159–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suarez, E., & Gadalla, T. M. (2010). Stop blaming the victim: A meta-analysis on rape myths. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 2010–2035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tasca, M., Rodriguez, N., Spohn, C., & Koss, M. P. (2013). Police decision making in sexual assault cases: Predictors of suspect identification and arrest. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28, 1157–1177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, J. (1999). Reporting rape in London: A qualitative study. The Howard Journal, 38, 17–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, J. (2010). “And always keep a-hold of nurse for fear of finding something worse”: Challenging rape myths in the court room. New Criminal Law Review, 13, 710–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, J., & Krahé, B. (2008). Sexual assault and the justice gap: A question of attitude. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Havens (2010). Wake Up To Rape Research Summary Report. Retrieved February 22, 2016, from: http://www.zerotolerance.org.uk/vaw/resources?page=1&type=28&subject=30.

  • Ullman, S. E. (2010). Talking about sexual assault: Society’s response to survivors. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vetten, L., Jewkes, R, Sigsworth, R., Christofides, N., Loots, L., & Dunseith, O. (2008). Tracking Justice: The attrition of rape cases through the Criminal Justice System in Gauteng. Johannesburg: Tshwaranang Legal Advocacy Centre, the South African Medical Research Council and the Centre for the Study of Violence and Reconciliation. Retrieved October 10, 2014, from www.csvr.org.za/docs/tracking_justice.pdf.

  • Viki, G. T., Abrams, D., & Masser, B. (2004). Evaluating stranger and acquaintance rape: The role of benevolent sexism in perpetrator blame and recommended sentence length. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 295–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. (1995). Attitudes toward rape. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, J. E., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1990). The determinants of mock jurors’ verdicts in a rape case. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 20, 901–919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz, E., & Archbold, C. A. (2012). Police perceptions of sexual assault victims: Exploring the intra-female gender hostility thesis. Police Quarterly, 15, 25–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheatcroft, J. M., Wagstaff, G. F., & Moran, A. (2009). Revictimizing the victim? How rape victims experience the UK legal system. Victims and Offenders, 4, 265–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. E., & Holmes, K. A. (1981). The second assault: Rape and public attitudes. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, F. W., & Koppelaar, L. (1991). Rape victims’ style of self-presentation and secondary victimization by the environment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 6, 29–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkel, F. W., & Koppelaar, L. (1992). Perceived credibility of the communicator: Studies of perceptual bias in police officers conducting rape interviews. In F. Lösel (Ed.), Psychology and law: International perspectives (pp. 219–232). Berlin: DeGruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Workman, J. E., & Orr, R. L. (1996). Clothing, sex of subject, and rape myth acceptance as factors affecting attributions about an incident of acquaintance rape. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 14, 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany

    Barbara Krahé

Authors
  1. Barbara Krahé
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barbara Krahé .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Heuweiler, Germany

    Helmut Kury

  2. Faculty of Law, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Sławomir Redo

  3. Zurich, Switzerland

    Evelyn Shea

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Krahé, B. (2016). Societal Responses to Sexual Violence Against Women: Rape Myths and the “Real Rape” Stereotype. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08397-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08398-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation