Abstract
What is the foundation for a cultural of justice in a school? Can a curriculum programme alone guarantee that students experience justice and leave school as potential contributors to global justice? Against the background of internationalization and standardization of secondary school education across the world pursued by the United Nations Scientific, Educational and Cultural Organization (OESCD), and academic assessment of the International Baccalaureate (IB) school curricula, this chapter examines the basis for asserting that a culture of justice exists at the Vienna International School (Vienna, Austria). It examines whether the adoption of the three IB curriculum programmes (Diploma Programme, Middle Years Programme and Primary Years Programme) are central to the existence of a culture of justice. It explores research on justice and democracy in education in the context of the Vienna International School and asks which of the characteristics identified as being necessary for justice and democracy to be present exist in the school. The chapter contends that while the curriculum plays a strong part in providing a context in which justice and democracy can be nurtured, this by itself would be insufficient to guarantee the culture of justice that is present in the school and that it is the relationships that exists between all the stakeholders that are key to the existence of a culture of justice at the Vienna International School.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
For an explanation of the IB programmes see http://ibo.org/programmes/.
For an academic analysis of international education, including the IB see, for example: http://www.bloomsbury.com/us/international-education-and-schools-9781472510464/.
- 2.
For articles critiquing aspects of the IB, its history and programmes, see: https://ibdocs.ibo.org/research/search.php?att=author&term=Hill&type=All.
- 3.
- 4.
This is the case until Grade 10, when students are only admitted if they will have sufficient basis in English to be able to cope with the linguistic demands of the IB Diploma Programme in Grade 11.
- 5.
This would contrast with a teacher-centered classroom approach.
References
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Doherty, C. (2012). Optimising meritocratic advantage with the International Baccalaureate Diploma in Australian Schools. Critical Studies in Education, 53(2), 183–196. doi:10.1080/17508487.2012.672329.
Gardner, H. (2009). The five minds for the future. School Administrator, 66(2), 16–20.
Gardner, M., & Toope, D. (2011). A social justice perspective on strengths-based approaches: Exploring educators’ perspectives and practices. Canadian Journal of Education, 34(3), 86–102.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Oxon: Routledge.
Hill, I. (2012). An international model of world-class education: The International Baccalaureate. Prospects (00331538), 42(3), 341–359. doi:10.1007/s11125-012-9243-9.
International Baccalaureate. (2014). MYP: From principles into practice. Cardiff, Wales: The International Baccalaureate Organisation.
Kohlberg, L. (1975). Just community approach. In Collected papers from the center for moral education, Chapter 29, (pp. 1–77). Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Univ., Graduate School of Education.
Mayer, A. P. (2008). Expanding opportunities for high academic achievement: An International Baccalaureate Diploma Program in an Urban High School. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(2), 202–235.
Maddix, M. A. (2011). Unite the pair so long disjoined: Justice and empathy in moral development theory. Christian Education Journal, 8(1), 46–63.
Olson, C. (2011). The deep roots of the fairness committee in Kohlberg’s moral development theory. Schools: Studies in Education, 8(1), 125–135.
Oser, F. K., Althof, W., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2008). The just community approach to moral education: System change or individual change? Journal of Moral Education, 37(3), 395–415. doi:10.1080/03057240802227551.
Ponterotto, J. G., Mendelowitz, D. E., & Collabolletta, E. A. (2008). Promoting multicultural personality development: A strengths-based, positive psychology worldview for schools. Professional School Counselling, 12(2), 93–99.
Roberts, B. (2011). Engaging with the community. In G. Walker (Ed.), The challenging face of international education (pp. 86–88). Cardiff, Wales: International Baccalaureate Organization.
Ültanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195–21.
Vienna International School Association: Statutes (2013) http://www.vis.ac.at/show_content2.php?s2id=23&language=en
Weinstock, M., Assor, A., & Broide, G. (2009). Schools as promoters of moral judgment: The essential role of teachers’ encouragement of critical thinking. Social Psychology of Education, 12(1), 137–151. doi:10.1007/s11218-008-9068-9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stanners, E. (2016). A Critical Examination of the Contention of the Existence of a Culture Justice Education at the Vienna International School, Austria. In: Kury, H., Redo, S., Shea, E. (eds) Women and Children as Victims and Offenders: Background, Prevention, Reintegration. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08398-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08397-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08398-8
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)