Advertisement

An Architecture for Telenoid Robot as Empathic Conversational Android Companion for Elderly People

  • Rosario Sorbello
  • Antonio Chella
  • Marcello Giardina
  • Shuichi Nishio
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 302)

Abstract

In Human-Humanoid Interaction (HHI), empathy is the crucial key in order to overcome the current limitations of social robots. In facts, a principal defining characteristic of human social behaviour is empathy. The present paper presents a robotic architecture for an android robot as a basis for natural empathic human-android interaction. We start from the hypothesis that the robots, in order to become personal companions need to know how to empathic interact with human beings. To validate our research, we have used the proposed system with the minimalistic humanoid robot Telenoid. We have conducted human-robot interactions test with elderly people with no prior interaction experience with robot. During the experiment, elderly persons engaged a stimulated conversation with the humanoid robot. Our goal is to overcome the state of loneliness of elderly people using this minimalistic humanoid robot capable to exhibit a dialogue similar to what usually happens in real life between human beings. The experimental results have shown a humanoid robotic system capable to exhibit a natural and empathic interaction and conversation with a human user.

Keywords

Humanoid robot Humanoid robot interaction Life support empathic robot Telenoid 

References

  1. 1.
    Agostaro, F., Augello, A., Pilato, G., Vassallo, G., Gaglio, S.: A conversational agent based on a conceptual interpretation of a data driven semantic space. In: AI* IA 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. Springer (2005) 381–392Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Balistreri, G., Nishio, S., Sorbello, R., Chella, A., Ishiguro, H.: Natural human robot meta-communication through the integration of android’s sensors with environment embedded sensors. In: BICA. (2011) 26–37Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breazeal, C.: Toward sociable robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3) (2003) 167–175Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.C., Mazziotta, J.C., Lenzi, G.L.: Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proceedings of the national Academy of Sciences 100(9) (2003) 5497–5502Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Pilato, G., Balistreri, G., Anzalone, S.M., Giardina, M.: An innovative mobile phone based system for humanoid robot expressing emotions and personality. In: BICA. (2011) 57–63Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Pilato, G., Vassallo, G., Balistreri, G., Giardina, M.: An architecture with a mobile phone interface for the interaction of a human with a humanoid robot expressing emotions and personality. In: AI* IA 2011: Artificial Intelligence Around Man and Beyond. Springer (2011) 117–126Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Pilato, G., Vassallo, G., Giardina, M.: A new humanoid architecture for social interaction between human and a robot expressing human-like emotions using an android mobile device as interface. In: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012. Springer (2013) 95–103Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Davis, M.H.: Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of personality and social psychology 44(1) (1983) 113Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hegel, F., Spexard, T., Wrede, B., Horstmann, G., Vogt, T.: Playing a different imitation game: Interaction with an empathic android robot. In: Humanoid Robots, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on, IEEE (2006) 56–61Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iocchi, L., Menegatti, E., Bonarini, A., Matteucci, M., Pagello, E., Aiello, L.C., Nardi, D., Mastrogiovanni, F., Sgorbissa, A., Zaccaria, R., et al.: Development of intelligent service robots. Intelligenza Artificiale 7(2) (2013) 139–152Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ishiguro, H., Nishio, S., Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Balistreri, G., Giardina, M., Calí, C.: Investigating perceptual features for a natural human-humanoid robot interaction inside a spontaneous setting. In: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures 2012. Springer (2013) 167–174Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ishiguro, H., Nishio, S., Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Balistreri, G., Giardina, M., Calí, C.: Perceptual social dimensions of human-humanoid robot interaction. In: Intelligent Autonomous Systems 12. Springer (2013) 409–421Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iwamura, Y., Shiomi, M., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets? In: Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2011 6th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. (March 2011) 449–457Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kozima, H., Nakagawa, C., Yano, H.: Can a robot empathize with people? Artificial Life and Robotics 8(1) (2004) 83–88Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Misselhorn, C.: Empathy with inanimate objects and the uncanny valley. Minds and Machines 19(3) (2009) 345–359Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mutlu, B., Yamaoka, F., Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Hagita, N.: Nonverbal leakage in robots: communication of intentions through seemingly unintentional behavior. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interaction, ACM (2009) 69–76Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ng, J.P., Kan, M.Y.: Qanus: An open-source question-answering platform (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pereira, A., Leite, I., Mascarenhas, S., Martinho, C., Paiva, A.: Using empathy to improve human-robot relationships. In: Human-Robot Personal Relationships. Springer (2011) 130–138Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Powers, A., Kramer, A.D., Lim, S., Kuo, J., Lee, S.l., Kiesler, S.: Eliciting information from people with a gendered humanoid robot. In: Robot and Human Interactive Communication, 2005. ROMAN 2005. IEEE International Workshop on, IEEE (2005) 158–163Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shimada, M., Kanda, T.: What is the appropriate speech rate for a communication robot? Interaction Studies 13(3) (2012) 408–435Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sorbello, R., Chella, A., Calí, C., Giardina, M., Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H.: Telenoid android robot as an embodied perceptual social regulation medium engaging natural human-humanoid interaction. Robotics and Autonomous Systems (2014)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Straub, I., Nishio, S., Ishiguro, H.: From an object to a subject-transitions of an android robot into a social being. In: RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE, IEEE (2012) 821–826Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J.: Emulating empathy in socially assistive robotics. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: Multidisciplinary Collaboration for Socially Assistive Robotics. (2007) 93–96Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Yamazaki, R., Nishio, S., Ogawa, K., Ishiguro, H.: Teleoperated android as an embodied communication medium: A case study with demented elderlies in a care facility. In: RO-MAN, 2012 IEEE, IEEE (2012) 1066–1071Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Yamazaki, R., Nishio, S., Ogawa, K., Ishiguro, H., Matsumura, K., Koda, K., Fujinami, T.: How does telenoid affect the communication between children in classroom setting? In: CHI’12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM (2012) 351–366Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rosario Sorbello
    • 1
  • Antonio Chella
    • 1
  • Marcello Giardina
    • 1
  • Shuichi Nishio
    • 2
  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Dept. DICGIM, RoboticsLabUniversitá degli Studi di PalermoPalermoItaly
  2. 2.ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication LaboratoryKyotoJapan
  3. 3.Dept. of Systems Innovation, Graduate School of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations