Bio-inspired Classification in the Architecture of Situated Agents

  • G. Gini
  • A. M. Franchi
  • F. Ferrini
  • F. Gallo
  • F. Mutti
  • R. Manzotti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 302)

Abstract

Cognitive development concerns the evolution of human mental capabilities through experience earned during life. Important features needed to accomplish this target are the self-generation of motivations and goals as well as the development of complex behaviors consistent with these goals. Our target is to build such a bio-inspired cognitive architecture for situated agents, capable of integrating new sensing data from any source. Based on neuroscience assessed concepts, as neural plasticity and neural coding, we show how a categorization module built on cascading classifiers is able to interpret different sensing data. Moreover, we see how to give a biological interpretation to our classification model using the winner-take-all paradigm.

Keywords

Bio-inspiration Perception Classifiers cascade One-class classifier Winner take all 

References

  1. 1.
    R. Manzotti, F. Mutti, S. Y. Lee and G. Gini, “A model of a middle level of cognition based on the interaction among the thalamus, amygdala, and the cortex.” IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 1996–2001, November 2012.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. Lungarella, G. Metta, R. Pfeiffer and G. Sandini, “Developmental robotics: a survey,” Connection Science, vol. 4, no. 15, pp. 151–190, 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Manzotti and V. Tagliasco, “From “behaviour-based” robots to “motivations-based” robots”, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 2, no. 51, pp. 175–190, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    J. Sharma, A. Angelucci and M. Sur, “Induction of visual orientation modules,” Nature, vol. 404, pp. 841–847, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. M. Sherman and R. Guillery, Exploring the Thalamus, Elsevier, 2000.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    S. Duncan and L. F. Barret, “The role of the amygdala in visual awareness,” Trends in cognitive science, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 190–192, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    F. Mussa-Ivaldi and E. Bizzi, “Motor learning through the combination of primitives,” Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society, vol. 355, no. 1404, pp. 1755–1769, 2000.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Jackendoff, Consciousness and the computational mind, MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    E. Rosh, “Principles of categorization,” Cognition and categorization, pp. 27–48, 1978.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    B. Olshausen A. and D. J. Field, “Sparse coding of sensory inputs,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 14, pp. 481–487, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    P. Viola and M. Jones, “Fast and Robust Classification using Asymmetric AdaBoost and a Detector Cascade,” Advances in Neural Information Processing System, vol. 14, pp. 1311–1318, 2001.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. D. Albright, E. R. Kandel and M. I. Posner, “Cognitive neuroscience,” Current Opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 10, pp. 612–624, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    P. Cisek and J. F. Kalaska, “Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices,” Annual Review of Neuroscience, vol. 33, pp. 269–298, 2010.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    E. R. Kandel, J. H. Schwartz and T. M. Jessell, Principles of neural science, McGraw-Hill, 2000.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    F. Mutti and G. Gini, “Bio-inspired disparity estimation system from energy neurons,” in International Conference on Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ICABB-2010, Venice, 2010.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Mutti, H. Marques and G. Gini, “A model of the visual dorsal pathway for computing coordinate transformations: an unsupervised approach,” in Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, Springer, 2013, pp. 239–246.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. Schneidman, W. Bialek and M. J. Berry, “Synergy, Redundancy, and Independence in population codes,” The Journal of Neuroscience, 2003.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    S. Denève, P. Latham and A. Pouget, “Efficient computation and cue,” Nature Neuroscience, vol. 4, no. 8, pp. 826–831, 2001.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    E. Salinas and L. Abbott, “Coordinate transformations in the visual system: how to generate gain fields and what to compute with them,” Progress in Brain Research, no. 130, pp. 175–190, 2001.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Carandini and D. J. Heeger, “Normalization as a canonical neural computation,” Nature Reviews Neuroscience, no. 13, pp. 51–62, 2013.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. Hyvärinen and E. Oja, “Independent component analysis: Algorithms and applications,” Neural Networks, vol. 13, no. 4–5, p. 411–430, 2000.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. A. Murray and S. P. Wise, “Interactions between orbital prefrontal cortex and amygdala:advanced cognition, learned responses and instinctive behaviors,” Current opinion in Neurobiology, vol. 20, pp. 212–220, 2010.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    D. J. Freedman, M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio and E. K. Miller, “Categorical Representation of Visual Stimuli in the Primate Prefrontal Cortex,” Science, vol. 291, no. 5502, pp. 312–316, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    D. M. Tax and R. P. Duin, “Combining One-Class Classifier,” in Multiple Classifier Systems, 2001, pp. 299–308.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    R. Rifkin and A. Klautau, “In difense of One-Vs-All Classification,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 5, pp. 101–141, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    C. D. Salzman and W. T. Newsome, “Neural mechanisms for forming a perceptual decision,” Science, vol. 5156, no. 264, pp. 231–237, 1994.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    T. Powell and G. Paynter, “Going Grey? Comparing the OCR Accuracy Levels of Bitonal and Greyscale Images,” D-Lib Magazine, vol. 15, no. 3–4, 2009.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    W. Chaney, Dynamic Mind, Houghton-Brace Publishing, 2007.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    J. M. Baker, L. Deng, J. Glass, S. Khudanpur, C.-H. Lee, N. Morgan and D. O’Shaughnessy, “Research Developments and Directions in Speech Recognition and Understanding,” Ieee Signal processing magazine, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 78–85, 2009.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Gini
    • 1
  • A. M. Franchi
    • 1
  • F. Ferrini
    • 1
  • F. Gallo
    • 1
  • F. Mutti
    • 1
  • R. Manzotti
    • 2
  1. 1.DEIBPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.IULM UniversityMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations