On the Formation Control of Multiagent Systems Under Nearly Cyclic Pursuit

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 302)

Abstract

We consider the problem of formation control of multiple agents under the nearly cyclic pursuit strategy. A control law is designed under this strategy for n agents to rendezvous at a point and also form a specific formation, dictated by an extra agent, called beacon. We derive constraint on the gain in kcirculant matrix to make the system stable. Formation tracking for n agents is achieved by applying an exogenous input to the beacon. We prove that the agents in nearly cyclic interaction are controllable under the beacon. Simulations and analytical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported in part by the University Research Grant, UBD/PNC2/2/RG/1(259).

References

  1. 1.
    Oggier. F, Bruckstein. A. : On Cyclic and Nearly Cyclic Multiagent Interactions in the Plane. Operator Theory: Advances and Applications. 218, 513–539, (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eduardo. G, Martinez. H, et all. : Convergence and collision avoidance in formation control. A survey of the artificial potential functions approach. InTech, (Chapter in Multi-Agent Systems-Modeling, Control, Programming, Simulations and Applications), (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Leonard. N, Fiorelli. E. : Virtual leaders, artificial potentials and coordinated control of groups. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 2968–2973, (2001)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dimarogonas. D, Kyriakopoulos. K. : Distributed cooperative control and collision avoidance for multiple kinematic agents. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, San Diego, USA, pp. 721–726, (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tanner. H. G, Kumar. A. : Towards Decentralization of Multi-robot Navigation Functions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 4132–4137, (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogren. P, Egerstedt. M, and X. Hu. : A control Lyapunov function approach to multi-agent coordination. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 18, pp, 847–851, October (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Blach. T, Arkin. R. : Behavior-based formation control for multi-robots Systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 14, no. 12, (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Egerstedt. M, Johansson K.H., Lygeros. J, and Sastry. S. : Behavior Based Robotics Using Regularized Hybrid Automata. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, Phoenix, AZ, Dec, (1999)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lin, Z, Broucke. M, and Francis, B. : Local control strategies for groups of mobile autonomous agents. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 49(4), 622–629, (2004)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marshall. J. A, Broucke. M, and Francis B. A. : Formations of vehicles in cyclic pursuit. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, pp. 1963–1974, (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marshall. J. A, Tsai. D. : Periodic formations of multivehicle systems. In IET Control Theory and Applications, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 389–396, March (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Smith. S, Broucke M, and Francis. B. : A Hierarchical Cyclic Pursuit Scheme for Vehicle Networks. Automatica, 41(6):1045–1053, (2005)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pavone. M, Frazzoli. E, : Decentralized Policies for Geometric Pattern Formation and Path Coverage. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, vol. 129, pp. 633–643, September (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boman. E. : The Moore Penrose pseudoinverse of an arbitrary, square, k-circulant matrix. Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 50:175–179, (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lafferriere. G, Williams A, Caughman. J, Veerman. P. : Decentralized control of vehicle formations. Systems Control Lett. 54 (9) 899–910, (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Desai. J, Ostrowski. J, and Kumar. V. : Modeling and Control of Formations of Nonholonomic Mobile Robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, Vol. 17(6), pp. 905–908, (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moore. K, Lucarelli. D. : Forced and constrained consensus among cooperating agents. IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Tucson, AZ, (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ren. W. : Multi-vehicle consensus with a time-varying reference state. Systems and Control Letters 56. pp. 474–483, (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mesbahi. M, Egerstedt. M. : Graph Theoretic Methods in Multiagent Networks. Princeton University Press, (2010)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Casti. J. : Linear Dynamical Systems. Academic Press, INC, (1987)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kailath. T. : Linear Systems. Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, (1980)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ren. W, Beard. R. : Information consensus in multivehicle cooperative control. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Science, The More Than One Robotics LaboratoryUniversity of Brunei DarussalamBruneiAsia

Personalised recommendations