A Knowledge-Based Approach to Crack Detection in Thermographic Images

  • Stefano Ghidoni
  • Mauro Antonello
  • Loris Nanni
  • Emanuele Menegatti
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 302)

Abstract

This paper describes an innovative visual inspection system for the detection of small cracks in metal parts. Given the extremely low dimension of the defects to be detected, the system is based on a thermographic approach: defects are recognized analyzing the heat flux induced by an excitation. The system is able to analyze parts of very high complexity, like a crankshaft, thanks to the introduction of an articulated robot, used for moving the part. The system also benefits from a deep knowledge of the inspected part and of the imaging system: this is exploited to reduce the high number of artifacts and reflections that appear in thermographic images when heat sources are employed. The core of the inspection mechanism is a computer vision algorithm that is capable of analyzing the thermographic images, extract the thermal information, and exploit a Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier to provide a final decision on the presence of a crack in the analyzed part.

Keywords

Computer vision Automated visual inspection Thermographic image analysis Pattern recognition 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Union, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013), under grant agreement No. 284607.

References

  1. 1.
    M.S. Millán and J. Escofet. Fabric inspection by near-infrared machine vision. Optics Letters, 29(13):1440–1442, Jul 2004.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    S. Ghidoni, M. Minella, L Nanni, C. Ferrari, M. Moro, E. Pagello, and E. Menegatti. Automatic crack detection in thermal images for metal parts. In Heating by Electromagnetic Sources, Proceedings of the International conference on, May 2013.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    T. Ummenhofer and J. Medgenberg. On the use of infrared thermography for the analysis of fatigue damage processes in welded joints. International Journal of Fatigue, 31(1):130–137, 2009.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Neubauer. Intelligent x-ray inspection for quality control of solder joints. Components, Packaging, and Manufacturing Technology, Part C, IEEE Transactions on, 20(2):111–120, 1997.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    T.S. Newman and A.K. Jain. A survey of automated visual inspection. Computer vision and image understanding, 61(2):231–262, 1995.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    E.N. Malamas, E.G.M. Petrakis, M. Zervakis, L. Petit, and J.-D. Legat. A survey on industrial vision systems, applications and tools. Image and vision computing, 21(2):171–188, 2003.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    M. Shirvaikar. Trends in automated visual inspection. Journal of Real-Time Image Processing, 1(1):41–43, 2006.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. Ghidoni, M. Minella, L. Nanni, C. Ferrari, M. Moro, E. Pagello, and E. Menegatti. Automatic crack detection in thermal images for metal parts. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Heating by Electromagnetic Sources 2013, pages 181–188, May 2013.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    C. Eitzinger, S. Ghidoni, and E. Menegatti. Thermobot: towards semi-autonomous, thermographic detection of cracks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Heating by Electromagnetic Sources 2013, pages 461–468, May 2013.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Gachagan, A. McNab, and P. Reynolds. Analysis of ultrasonic wave propagation in metallic pipe structures using finite element modelling techniques. In Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004 IEEE, volume 2, pages 938–941. IEEE, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    T. Theodoulidis, S. Panas, and E. Kriezis. Eddy current detection of crack orientation using elliptical excitation. In Science, Measurement and Technology, IEE Proceedings, volume 141, pages 41–47. IET, 1994.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    P. Xu and K. Shida. Eddy current sensor with a novel probe for crack position detection. In 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, pages 1–6. IEEE, IEEE, April 2008.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    G. Tian, A. Sophian, D. Taylor, and J. Rudlin. Multiple sensors on pulsed eddy-current detection for 3-D subsurface crack assessment. IEEE Sensors Journal, 5(1):90–96, February 2005.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Hwang, J. Kim, and J. Lee. Magnetic images of surface crack on heated specimen using an area-type magnetic camera with high spatial resolution. In Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, 2009. I2MTC’09. IEEE, pages 1546–1551. IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. Sophian, G. Tian, and S. Zairi. Pulsed magnetic flux leakage techniques for crack detection and characterisation. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, 125(2):186–191, 2006.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    T. Liu. Application of thermo-electric Joule heating for crack detection. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Mechanical and Electronics Engineering, volume 1, pages V1–103-V1-107. IEEE, IEEE, August 2010.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    H. Shafeek, E. Gadelmawla, A. Abdel-Shafy, and I. Elewa. Assessment of welding defects for gas pipeline radiographs using computer vision. NDT & E International, 37(4):291–299, June 2004.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    P. Prasanna, K. Dana, N. Gucunski, and B. Basily. Computer-vision based crack detection and analysis. In M.i Tomizuka, C. Yun, and J. Lynch, editors, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials+ Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring, pages 834542–834542-6. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2012.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    N. Turakhia, R. Shah, and M. Joshi. Automatic crack detection in heritage site images for image inpainting. In Proceedings of the Eighth Indian Conference on Computer Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, page 68. ACM, 2012.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    M. Genest, D. Dudzinski, S. Bulmer, and R. Kersey. Crack detection using induction thermography for thermomechanical fatigue tests. In Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation: Volume 30A; Volume 30B, volume 1335, pages 1727–1734. AIP Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    D. Wagner, N. Ranc, C. Bathias, and P. Paris. Fatigue crack initiation detection by an infrared thermography method. Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 33(1):12–21, 2010.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    E. Kostson, B. Weekes, D. Almond, J. Wilson, G. Tian, Donald O. Thompson, and Dale E. Chimenti. Crack detection using pulsed eddy current stimulated thermography. In Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation: Volume 30A; Volume 30B, volume 1335, pages 415–422. AIP Publishing, 2011.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    X. Maldague, F. Galmiche, and A. Ziadi. Advances in pulsed phase thermography. Infrared Physics & Technology, 43(3-5):175–181, June 2002.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    T. Maffren, P. Juncar, F. Lepoutre, and G. Deban. Crack detection in high-pressure turbine blades with flying spot active thermography in the SWIR range. In Review of progress in quantitative nondestructive evaluation: Volume 31, volume 1430, pages 515–522. AIP Publishing, 2012.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    A. Besbes, N. Komodakis, G. Langs, and N. Paragios. Shape priors and discrete mrfs for knowledge-based segmentation. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2009. CVPR 2009. IEEE Conference on, pages 1295–1302. IEEE, 2009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    N. Paragios, M. Rousson, and V. Ramesh. Knowledge-based registration & segmentation of the left ventricle: a level set approach. In Applications of Computer Vision, 2002. (WACV 2002). Proceedings. Sixth IEEE Workshop on, pages 37–42. IEEE, 2002.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    G. Kylberg, M. Uppström, and I. Sintorn. Virus texture analysis using local binary patterns and radial density profiles. In Progress in Pattern Recognition, Image Analysis, Computer Vision, and Applications, pages 573–580. Springer, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    S. Theodoridis and K. Koutroumbas. Pattern recognition. Academic Press, 4th edition edition, 2009.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    T. Möller and B. Trumbore. Fast, minimum storage ray-triangle intersection. Journal of graphics tools, 2(1):21–28, 1997.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    P. Azad, T. Gockel, and R. Dillmann. Computer Vision: principles and practice. Elector International Media BV 2008, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Ghidoni
    • 1
  • Mauro Antonello
    • 1
  • Loris Nanni
    • 1
  • Emanuele Menegatti
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PadovaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations