Advertisement

Green and Distributed Architecture for Managing Big Data of Biodiversity

  • Idrissa SarrEmail author
  • Hubert Naacke
  • Ndiouma Bame
  • Ibrahima Gueye
  • Samba Ndiaye
Chapter

Abstract

The biodiversity term refers to the totality of genes, species, and ecosystems of a region or the globe. Biodiversity’s impact on the human health and the ecosystem is without a doubt very significative. Therefore, the conservation of the biodiversity is becoming an international political and scientific issue since it may have a drawback on climate and the human health or survival. For a sustainable development perspective, several ongoing studies are conducted to analyze, predict, and face biodiversity changes. Such studies require a huge volume of data collected, stored, shared, and exploited intensively by researchers through the world by using web technologies and information systems as GEOBON, LifeWacth, GBIF, MosquitoMap. These systems handle an important amount of computing and database resources that must be optimized for avoiding maintaining useless resources while reducing considerably the energy usage. Actually, the goal of such optimization that we propose in this chapter is to adapt (increase or decrease) the number of resources for dealing with data of biodiversity based on the current load (or number of requests) while ensuring good performances. The benefits of doing so are manifold. First, it fits perfectly with the objectives of green computing or green IT that suggest to define computing systems efficiently and effectively with minimal or no impact on the environment. Second, it is well suited for African developing countries that encounter frequently energy problems and that miss enough funds to maintain complex infrastructures.

Keywords

Cloud Computing Data Placement Biodiversity Data Global Biodiversity Information Facility Place Replica 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    S.K. Barker, Y. Chi, J.H. Moon et al., “Cut me some slack”: latency-aware live migration for databases, in International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT) (2012), pp. 432–443Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Canadian BIF (2013), www.cbif.gc.ca
  3. 3.
    C. Curino, E.P.C. Jones, Z. Yang et al., Schism: a workload-driven approach to database replication and partitioning. VLDB Endow. 3(1–2) 48–57 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. Curino, E.P.C. Jones, S. Madden, Workload-aware database monitoring and consolidation, in International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (2011), pp. 313–324Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. Das, D. Agrawal, A. El Abbadi, ElasTraS: an elastic transactional data store in the cloud, in International Conference on Hot topics in Cloud Computing (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    A.J. Elmore, S. Das, D. Agrawal et al., Zephyr: live migration in shared nothing database for elastic cloud platforms, in International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    U.M. Farooq, R. Lui, A. Aboulnaga et al., Elastic scale-out for partition-based database systems, in IEEE International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE) (2012), pp. 281–288Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    GBIF France (2013), www.gbif.fr
  9. 9.
    GBIF Secretary: GBIF data portal, GBIF web site (2013), data.gbif.org
  10. 10.
    GEOBON Web site (2013), www.earthobservations.org
  11. 11.
    I. Gueye, I. Sarr, H. Naacke, TransElas: elastic transaction monitoring for Web2.0 applications, in Data Management in Cloud, Grid and P2P Systems (2012), pp. 1–12Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    I. Gueye, I. Sarr, H. Naacke, Exploiting the social structure of online media to face transient heavy workload. In The Sixth Intl. Conf. on Advances in Databases, Knowledge, and Data Applications, IARIA (2014), pp. 51–58Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    LifeWatch Web Site (2013), www.lifewatch.com
  14. 14.
    Map of Life (2013), www.mappinglife.org
  15. 15.
    MosquitoMap (2014), www.mosquitomap.org
  16. 16.
    A. Quamar, K. Ashwin, A. Deshpande, SWORD: scalable workload-aware data placement for transactional workloads, in International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT) (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    J. Schaffner, T. Januschowski, M. Kercher et al., RTP: robust tenant placement for elastic in-memory database clusters, in International Conference on Management of Data (SIGMOD) (2013), pp. 773–784Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    The Convention on Biological Diversity (2013), http://www.cbd.int/
  19. 19.
    A. Thomson, T. Diamond, S. Weng et al., Calvin: fast distributed transactions for partitioned database systems, in SIGMOD (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Idrissa Sarr
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hubert Naacke
    • 2
  • Ndiouma Bame
    • 1
  • Ibrahima Gueye
    • 1
  • Samba Ndiaye
    • 1
  1. 1.Université Cheikh Anta DiopDakarSenegal
  2. 2.Sorbonne UniversitésParisFrance

Personalised recommendations