Advertisement

A Study on Geospatial Constrained Process Modeling Using UML Activity Diagrams

  • Guobin Zhu
  • Xinwei Zhu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 181)

Abstract

This paper studies an extended process model under geospatial constraints using UML 2.0 activity diagrams. The geometry (i.e. point, line and polygon) models and geospatial relationship (i.e. measurement, sequential, and topology) models used in the paper are tailored from OGC and ISO/TC 211 standards with respect to requirements of process management. On the basis of these models, the paper analyzes how geospatial information restrains activities in process meta-model and how it acts on activities. Further, an UML profile is derived based on UML activity diagrams, and is validated by a case scenario. The contribution of this paper is marked as two points. First, the geometry models and geospatial relationship models proposed in this paper are based on abstract specification of international standards, making them better for understanding, sharing, and exchanging. Second, the geospatial constraints relied on geospatial relationship models adapt to most cases in process modeling, making them more generalizable and extendable.

Keywords

Geospatial Constraint Process Modeling UML Activity Diagram 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amadio, G., Cannafoglia, C., Corongiu, M., Desideri, M., Rossi, M.: IntesaGIS: The Bases for a National Spatial Data Infrastructure. In: 10th EC-GI & GIS Workshop, ESDI: The State of the Art Warsaw. Poland (2004)Google Scholar
  2. Brodeur, J., Bédard, Y., Proulx, M.-J.: Modelling geographic Application databases using UML-based repositories aligned with international standards in geomatics. In: 8th ACM Symposium on GIS, Washington, D.C. (2000)Google Scholar
  3. de Leoni, M., Adams, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.: Visual Support for Work Assignment in Process-Aware Information Systems: Framework Formalisation and Implementation. Decision Support Systems 54(1), 341–361 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Decker, M.: Location-Aware Access Control: An Overview. In: Wireless Applications and Computing, Carvoeiro, Portugal (2009)Google Scholar
  5. Decker, M.: Modelling of Mobile Workflows with UML. International Journal on Advances in Telecommunications 3(1&2), 59–71 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. Decker, M., Stürzel, P., Klink, S., Oberweis, A.: Location Constraints for Mobile Workflows. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Conf. on Techniques and Applications for Mobile Commerce, TAMoCo, pp. 93–102 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. Hollingsworth, D.: The Workflow Reference Model. Workflow Management Coalition (1995)Google Scholar
  8. Lake, R., Burggraf, D.S., Trninic, M.: Geography Mark-up Language: Foundation for the Geo-web. John Wiley & Sons (2004)Google Scholar
  9. OGC Relationships between Features. The OpenGIS Abstract Specification, p. 17 (1999)Google Scholar
  10. OMG Unified Modeling Language. Object Management Group (2007)Google Scholar
  11. Pullar, D., Egenhofer, M.: Towards Formal Definition of Topological Relations among Spatial Objects. In: Marble, D. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on Spatial Data Handling, Sydney, Australia, pp. 225–242 (1988)Google Scholar
  12. Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Flender, C.: Contextualisation of Business Processes. International Journal of Business Process Integration and Management 3(1), 47–60 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rosemann, M., Recker, J., Flender, C., Ansell, P.: Understanding Context-Awareness in Business Process Design. In: 17th Australasian Conference on Information Systems, Adelaide, Australia (2006)Google Scholar
  14. Theobald, D.M.: Topology revisited: representing spatial relations. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 15(8), 689–705 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Van der Aalst, W.M.: Process Mining. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  16. Van der Aalst, W.M.: Workflow Verification: Finding Control-Flow Errors Using Pebi-Net-Based Techniques. In: Business Process Management, pp. 161–183 (2000)Google Scholar
  17. Zhang, L., Zhao, J., Jia, W., Liu, B.: Location-aware Workflow Modeling and Soundness Verfication Method Based on Petri net. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems 18(008), 1747–1756 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guobin Zhu
    • 1
  • Xinwei Zhu
    • 1
  1. 1.International School of SoftwareWuhan UniversityWuhanChina

Personalised recommendations