Advertisement

Occupational Science Informing Occupational Therapy Interventions

Chapter

Abstract

Occupational therapists’ need for greater knowledge of occupation is described from two perspectives: as it was understood at the time the profession was established and as it is defined in the present day. Occupational science responds to that need. This new field of investigation is defined, and understandings about occupation that are shared by occupational therapists and scientists are reviewed. Three ways in which occupational science informs practice are identified. First, it supports a return to occupation-focused practice, where occupation is both the means of intervening and the goal of intervention, and understanding clients’ occupational history is essential. Second, occupational scientists are generating new intervention strategies, two of which are briefly outlined. Third, occupational science is opening up new practice areas with vulnerable populations, such as immigrants and refugees, using interventions that promote population health rather than providing rehabilitation. The need for ongoing research, particularly to support population-based interventions, is recognised.

Keywords

Environment Health and well-being Occupation Participation 

References

  1. Baker N, Tickle-Degnen L (2014) Evidence-based practice. In Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa ME (eds) Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy, 12th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 398–412Google Scholar
  2. Blanche E, Fogelberg D, Diaz J, Carlson M, Clark F (2011) Manualization of occupational therapy interventions: illustrations from the pressure ulcer prevention research program. Am J Occup Ther 65(6):711–719CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chisholm D, Boyt Schell BA (2014) Overview of the occupational therapy process and outcome. In Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa ME (eds) Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy, 12th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 266–280Google Scholar
  4. Christiansen C (2007) Adolf Meyer revisited: connections between lifestyles, resilience and illness. J Occup Sci 14(2):63–76. doi:10.1080/14427591.2007.9686586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Christiansen CH, Haertl K (2014) A contextual history of occupational therapy. In Boyt Schell BA, Gillen G, Scaffa ME (eds) Willard and Spackman’s occupational therapy, 12th edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 9–34Google Scholar
  6. Clark FA, Parham D, Carlson ME, Frank G, Jackson J, Pierce D et al (1991) Occupational science: academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy’s future. Am J Occup Ther 45:300–310. doi:10.5014/ajot.45.4.300CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark F, Carlson M, Polkinghorne D (1997) Legitimacy of life history and narrative approaches in the study of occupation. Am J Occup Ther 51(4):313–317. doi:10.5014/ajot.51.4.313CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark F, Sanders K, Carlson M, Blanche E, Jackson J (2007) Synthesis of habit theory. OTJR: Occup Particip Health 27(Suppl1):7S−23SGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor Schisler A, Polatajko H (2002) The individual as mediator of the person-occupation-environment interaction: learning from the experience of refugees. J Occup Sci 10(1):7–13. doi:10.1080/14427591.2002.9686496Google Scholar
  10. Dale Stone S (2003) Workers without work: injured workers and well-being. J Occup Sci 10(1):7–13. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dale Stone S (2009) Multiple sclerosis and academic work: socio-spatial strategies adopted to maintain employment. J Occup Sci 16(1):25–31. doi:10.1080/14427591.2009.9686638Google Scholar
  12. Dickie VA (2003) The role of learning in quilt making. J Occup Sci 10(3):120–129. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickie VA (2010) Are occupations processes too complicated to explain? What we can learn by trying. J Occup Sci 17(4):120–129. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010.9686696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Eklund M, Hermansson A, Håkansson C (2012) Meaning in life for people with schizophrenia: does it include occupation? J Occup Sci 19(2):93–105. doi:10.1080/14427591.2011.605833CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eklund M, Wastberg B, Erlandsson L-K (2013) Work outcomes and their predictors in the ReDesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) rehabilitation programme for women with stress-related disorders. Aust Occup Ther J 60:85–92. doi:10.1111/1441-1630.12019CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Erlandsson L-K (2013). The Redesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) program: supporting women with stress-related disorders to return to work-knowledge base, structure, and content. Occup Ther Ment Health 29(1):85–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Erlandsson L-K, Eklund M (2003) Women’s experience of hassles and uplifts in their everyday patterns of occupation. Occup Ther Int 10:95–114CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Erlandsson L-K, Eklund M (2006) Levels of complexity in patterns of daily occupations: relationship to women’s well-being. J Occup Sci 13(1):27–36. doi:10.1080/14427591.2006.9686568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Erlandsson L-K, Eklund M (2011) Return to work outcomes of the ReDesigning Daily Occupations (ReDO) program for women with stress-related disorders: a comparative study. Women Health 51:676–692CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans J, Rodger S (2008) Mealtimes and bedtimes: windows to family routines and rituals. J Occup Sci 15(2):98–104. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686615CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fish M (1947) Educational aims in occupational therapy. In Willard HS, Spackman CS (eds) Principles of occupational therapy. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 23–39Google Scholar
  22. Fox J, Quinn S (2012) The meaning of social activism to older adults. J Occup Sci 19(4):358–370. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.701179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gray JM (1997) Application of the phenomenological method to the concept of occupation. J Occup Sci 4(1):5–17. doi:10.1080/14427591.1997.9686416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hessell S, Hocking C, Graham-Jones S (2010) Participation of boys with DCD in gymnastics. N Z J Occup Ther 57(1):14–21Google Scholar
  25. Hocking C (2012) Occupational science. In Gellman MD, Turner JR (eds) Encyclopedia of behavioural medicine. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 1365–1371Google Scholar
  26. Hoffman T, Bennett S, del Mar C (2013) Evidence-based practice across the health professions, 2nd edn. Elsevier, ChatswoodGoogle Scholar
  27. Horghagen S, Josephsson S (2010) Theatre as liberation, collaboration and relationship for asylum seekers. J Occup Sci 17(3):168–176. doi:10.1080/14427591.2010. 9686691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jakobsen K (2004) If work doesn’t work: how to enable occupational justice. J Occup Sci 11(3):125–134. doi:10.1080/14427591.2004.9686540CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones M (2014) Participation for New Zealand children after traumatic brain injury [Doctoral thesis, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand]. http://aut.researchgateway.ac.nz/
  30. Koome F, Hocking C, Sutton D (2012) Why routines matter: the nature and meaning of family routines in the context of adolescent mental illness. J Occup Sci 19(4):312–325. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.718245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lee CJ, Skarakis-Doyle E, Dempsey L (2003) The contributions of activity and occupation to young children’s comprehension of picture books. J Occup Sci 10(3):146–149. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Manuel PM (2003) Occupied with ponds: exploring the meaning, bewaring the loss for kids and communities of nature’s small spaces. J Occup Sci 10(1):31–39. doi:10.1080/14427591.2003.9686508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McElroy T, Muyinda H, Atim S, Spittal P, Backman C (2012) War, displacement and productive occupations in Northern Uganda. J Occup Sci 19(3):198–212. doi:10.1080/14427591.2012.614681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Persson D, Erlandsson L-K, Eklund M, Iwarsson S (2001) Value dimensions, meaning and complexity in human occupation: a tentative structure for analysis. Scand J Occup Ther 8:7–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Polatajko HJ, Mandich A, Martini R (2000) Dynamic performance analysis: a framework for understanding occupational performance. Am J Occup Ther 54(1):65–72. doi:10.5014/ajot.54.1.65CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Primeau L (2000) Household work: when gender ideologies and practices interact. J Occup Sci 7(3):118–127. doi:10.1080/14427591.2000.9686474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Russell E (2008) Writing on the wall: the form, function and meaning of tagging. J Occup Sci 15(2):87–97. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steindl C, Winding K, Runge U (2008) Occupation and participation in everyday life: women’s experiences of an Austrian refugee camp. J Occup Sci 15(1):36–42. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686605CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sutton DJ, Hocking CS, Smythe LA (2012) A phenomenological study of occupational engagement in recovery from mental illness. Can J Occup Ther 79(3):142–150. doi:10.2182/cjot.2012.79.3.3CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Tonneijck HIM, Kinébanian A, Josephsson S (2008) An exploration of choir singing: achieving wholeness through challenge. J Occup Sci 15(3):173–180. doi:10.1080/14427591.2008.9686627CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Walker C (2001) Occupational adaptation in action: shift workers and their strategies. J Occup Sci 8(1):17–24. doi:10.1080/14427591.2001.9686481CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Whiteford G, Townsend E, Hocking C (2000) Reflections on a renaissance of occupation. Can J Occup Ther 67(1):61–69CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Wilcock AA, Hocking C (2015) An occupational perspective of health, 3rd ed. Slack, ThorofareGoogle Scholar
  44. World Health Organization (1978) Declaration of Alma-Ata. International conference on primary health care, Alma Ata, USSR. http://www.who.int/social_determinants/tools/multimedia/alma_ata/en/
  45. World Federation of Occupational Therapists (1998) Minimum standards for the education of occupational therapists. Forrestfield, Western AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  46. Wright-St. Clair VA, Pierce D, Bunrayong W, Rattakorn P, Vittayakorn S, Shordike A, Hocking C (2013) Cross-cultural understandings of festival food-related activities for older women in Chiang Mai, Thailand, Eastern Kentucky, USA and Auckland, New Zealand. J Cross-Cultural Geront 28(2):103–119. doi:10.1007/s10823-013-9194-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yerxa EJ, Clark F, Frank G, Jackson J, Parham D, Pierce D et al (1989) An introduction to occupational science: a foundation for occupational therapy practice in the 21st century. Occup Ther Health Care 6(4):1–17Google Scholar
  48. Zemke R, Clark F (eds) (1996) Occupational science: the evolving discipline. F. A. Davis, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Occupational Science and TherapyAuckland University of TechnologyAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations