Skip to main content

Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions

Abstract

Ayres (1972, p. 11) defined sensory integration as “the neurological process that organizes sensation from one’s own body and from the environment and makes it possible to use the body effectively within the environment.” The sensory integration process reflects a dynamic, self-organizing interaction between the child and the physical and social environment. This process is believed to be the natural result of a child’s typical sensorimotor development. Sensory integration allows the child to engage in and participate in a wide range of meaningful and purposeful activities.

After ASI, Max’s mother reported. Max started to play trucks and cars with the other kids at school and can focus long enough to play a board game with the family. He will give verbal encouragement to another child who is upset. He is better able to participate in dressing and his sleeping has improved…he is now able to transition to bed with more ease, which was a welcome improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahn RR, Miller LJ, Milberger S, McIntosh DN (2004) Prevalence of parents’ perceptions of sensory processing disorders among kindergarten children. Am J Occup Ther 58(3):287–293

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association (2013) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edn. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington. dsm.psychiatryonline.org. Accessed 1 June 2013

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ayres AJ (1972) Sensory integration and learning disorders. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres AJ (1989) Sensory integration and praxis tests manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres AJ (2011) Ayres dyspraxia monograph, 25th Anniversary edn. Pediatric Therapy Network, Torrance

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Sasson A, Cermak SA, Orsmond GI, Tager-Flusberg H, Carter AS, Kadlec MB, Dunn W (2007) Extreme sensory modulation behaviors in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders. Am J Occup Ther 61(5):584–592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Sasson A, Carter AS, Briggs-Gowan MJ (2009) Sensory over-responsivity in elementary school: prevalence and social-emotional correlates. J Abnorm Child Psychol 37(5):705–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blanche EI (2010) Observations based on sensory integration theory. Pediatric Therapy Network, Torrance

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanche EI, Bodison S, Chang MC, Reinoso G (2012) Development of the comprehensive observations of proprioception (COP): validity, reliability, and factor analysis. Am J Occup Ther 66(6):691–698

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cermak S, Larkin D (eds) (2002) Developmental coordination disorder: theory and practice. Singular, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Cermak S, Trimble H, Coryell J, Drake C (1991) The persistence of motor deficits in older students with learning disabilities. Jpn J Sens Integr 2:17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies PL, Tucker R (2010) Evidence review to investigate the support for subtypes of children with difficulty processing and integrating sensory information. Am J Occup Ther 64(3):391–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn W (1999) The sensory profile. The Psychological Corporation, San Antonio

    Google Scholar 

  • Keuler MM, Schmidt NL, Van Hulle CA, Lemery-Chalfant K, Goldsmith HH (2011) Sensory over-responsivity: prenatal risk factors and temperamental contributions. J Dev Behav Pediatr 32(7):533

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinnealey M, Koenig KP, Smith S (2011) Relationships between sensory modulation and social supports and health-related quality of life. Am J Occup Ther 65(3):320–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mailloux Z, Mulligan S, Roley SS, Blanche E, Cermak S, Coleman GG, Bodison S, Lane CJ (2011) Verification and clarification of patterns of sensory integrative dysfunction. Am J Occup Ther 65(2):143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May-Benson TA, Cermak SA (2007) Development of an assessment for ideational praxis. Am J Occup Ther 61:148–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May-Benson TA, Koomar JA (2010) Systematic review of the research evidence examining the effectiveness of interventions using a sensory integrative approach for children. Am J Occup Ther 64:403–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May-Benson TA, Koomar JA, Teasdale A (2009) Incidence of pre-, peri-, and post-natal birth and developmental problems of children with sensory processing disorder and children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Integr Neurosci 3:31

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • May-Benson TA, Roley SS, Maillous Z, Parham LD, Koomar J, Schaaf RC, Van Jaarsveld A, Cohn E (2014) Inter-rater reliability and discriminative validity of the structural elements of the Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention Fidelity Measure©. Am J Occup Ther 68:506–513. doi:10.5014/ajot.2014.010652

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller LJ, Anzalone ME, Lane SJ, Cermak SA, Osten ET (2007) Concept evolution in sensory integration: a proposed nosology for diagnosis. Am J Occup Ther 61(2):135–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan S (2002) Advances in sensory integration research. In: Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA (eds) Sensory integration: theory and practice, 2nd edn. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia, pp 397–411

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham LD, Ecker C, Kuhaneck HM, Henry DA, Glennon TJ (2007) Sensory processing measure manual. Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham LD, Roley SS, May-Benson T, Koomar J, Brett-Green B, Burke JP, Cohn ES, Mailloux Z, Miller LJ, Schaaf RC (2011) Development of a fidelity measure for research on effectiveness of Ayres’ sensory integration. Am J Occup Ther 65(2):133–142. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000745

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeiffer BA, Koenig K, Kinnealey M, Sheppard M, Henderson L (2011) Effectiveness of sensory integration interventions in children with autism spectrum disorders: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther 65(1):76–85

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaaf RC, Blanche EI (2012) Emerging as leaders in autism research and practice: using the data-driven intervention process. Am J Occup Ther 66(5):503–505

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaaf RC, Benevides T, Mailloux Z, Kelly D, Faller P, Hunt J, Van Hooydonk E, Freeman R, Leiby R, Sendecki B (2014) An intervention for sensory difficulties in children with autism: a randomized trial. J Autism Dev Disord 44:1493–1506. doi:10.1007/s10803-013-1983-8

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (2010) International statistical classification of diseases and health related problems. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa A. May-Benson ScD, OTR/L, FAOTA .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

The Case Study of: Caroline, a Child with Problems Processing and Integrating Sensory Information

Keywords

Integration, intervention, praxis, sensory, sensory defensiveness

Introduction

The theme of this case study concerns provision of Ayres Sensory Integration® (ASI) intervention for a child with problems processing and integrating sensory information.

The students’ tasks include:

  1. 1.

    Finding information about the sensory integration frame of reference.

  2. 2.

    Synthesizing assessment results to identify patterns of sensory integration dysfunction.

  3. 3.

    Determining possible outcome measures, goals, and objectives for intervention.

  4. 4.

    Identifying possible sensory integration activities to address major areas of concern.

  5. 5.

    Synthesizing the case information into a report.

As a starting point, the students should use the following references in addition to the references cited in the text to gather background information:

  • Bundy AC, Lane SJ, Murray EA (2002) Sensory integration: theory and practice, 2nd ed. F.A. Davis Company, Philadelphia

  • Polatajko HJ, Cantin N (2010) Exploring the effectiveness of occupational therapy interventions, other than the sensory integration approach, with children and adolescents experiencing difficulty processing and integrating sensory information. Am J Occup Ther 64(3), 415–429

  • Schaaf RC, Schoen SA, Smith Roley S, Lane SJ, Koomar J, May-Benson TA (2010) A frame of reference for sensory integration. In: Kramer P, Hinojosa J (eds) Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 99–186

  • Smith-Roley S, Blanche EI, Schaaf RC (eds) (2001) Understanding the nature of sensory integration with diverse populations. Therapy Skill Builders, San Antonio

Overview of the Content

The major goals of ASI intervention are to:

  1. 1.

    Facilitate participation in activities

  2. 2.

    Support self-regulation of behavior as a basis for participation in daily activities

  3. 3.

    Facilitate the development of praxis as a building block for participation in activities

Learning Objectives

By the end of this chapter, the learner will:

  • Be able to understand the theoretical postulates of the sensory integrative approach

  • Apply common terminology in the OT–SI approach

  • Understand the unique features of this approach

  • Outline the process for assessment, intervention and documentation of outcomes in the SI approach

  • Understand the application of the OT–SI approach through a case example

The Background History of the Clinical Case Study

Personal Data

Caroline is an 8-year and 1-month-old female in second grade of school.

Medical Diagnoses and Prognoses

Caroline was born at 25 weeks’ gestation by emergency C-section weighing 1.25 lbs. She was hospitalized in the neonatal intensive care unit for 3 months. Early developmental milestones were within normal limits. She is left-hand dominant. She has diagnoses of learning disability, attention deficit disorder, and language processing problems.

Reason for Seeking Occupational Therapy

Caroline’s parents were concerned about her high state of arousal and over-responsivity to sensations provided by daily activities, such as bathing and hair brushing, which often resulted in extreme emotionality and frequent behavioral outbursts. They expressed that Caroline lacked independence in dressing, self-care, and hygiene and that they were afraid that her social interactions and acceptance by her peers were affected by her poor hygiene and sloppy dress. They believed her poor fine motor skills and handwriting adversely impacted her ability to complete her school work. They wanted Caroline to be less frustrated and more successful in school with an overall better self-esteem . They also wanted home life to be easier and less stressful for the all family members.

Current Circumstances

Caroline was evaluated using the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests (SIPT), informal clinical observations of posture, motor skills and balance, and a parent-completed developmental/sensory history. Her assessment indicated that Caroline was very defensive to touch and had sensitivities to visual and auditory sensory inputs. She sought proprioceptive input through jumping on beds and chewing on her clothing and other objects as a means of regulating and organizing her behavior. Caroline demonstrated decreased tactile, proprioceptive, and vestibular discrimination which contributed to problems in postural control and praxis . These difficulties resulted in difficulty carrying out motor-based activities, such as dressing and active play on a playground with peers. In the area of praxis, she demonstrated good ideation skills but had difficulties with motor planning, sequencing skills, and bilateral coordination.

Occupational Performance Issues

Caroline had difficulty with many daily living skills and difficulties in social participation. She had problems sleeping alone (often sleeping with her parents), falling asleep, and sleeping through the night. Being sensitive to certain clothing textures, tags in shirts, and socks, she was very particular about her clothing which interfered with her independence in dressing as well as completing her morning routines. She preferred to wear stretch pants and t-shirts because of difficulties dressing herself and managing fasteners. Caroline strongly resisted haircutting and hair brushing, and, with her clothing, often looked unkempt. She was a messy eater, had difficulties handling utensils, often knocked over glasses, and spilled or broke things. She had poor balance which made it hard to learn to ride a bicycle. At school, she often stood at the table instead of sitting, sat on the edge of her seat, and frequently fell out of her chair. Lastly, Caroline had problems organizing herself to clean up her room, do homework, or complete household chores.

The Student’s Report

The following questions are generated from the available literature, references, and our clinical experiences and will guide the student in developing an assessment and intervention plan for Caroline:

Questions

  1. 1.

    What assessments are appropriate to identify sensory integration problems for this child?

  2. 2.

    What patterns of sensory integration dysfunction does this child demonstrate?

  3. 3.

    What outcomes would you expect to change?

  4. 4.

    What short- and long-term goals would you set for this child?

  5. 5.

    What are the steps in the clinical reasoning process you would use to assess and treat this child?

  6. 6.

    What type of intervention setting and activities would be useful for this child?

  7. 7.

    What other intervention approaches may be useful to use with this child?

  8. 8.

    What is the research evidence for occupational therapy using a sensory integration approach?

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

May-Benson, T., Schaaf, R. (2015). Ayres Sensory Integration® Intervention. In: Söderback, I. (eds) International Handbook of Occupational Therapy Interventions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08141-0_44

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08141-0_44

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08140-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08141-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics