Brazil Towards Government 2.0: Strategies for Adopting Open Government Data in National and Subnational Governments

  • Ricardo Matheus
  • Manuella Maia Ribeiro
  • José Carlos Vaz
Chapter

Abstract

Open Government Data (OGD) is a stream in which raw data is published for manipulation by others. This chapter presents the State of Art of OGD in Brazilian National, State and Municipal governments, describing benefits that OGD have been promoted on governments and society such as transparency promotion, social control and citizen participation. In addition, strategies used by governments are outlined aimed at boosting usage and the creation of chain value of OGD usage. Exploratory research is conducted by investing websites in accordance with the eight principles of OGD and the five stars of open linked data. Brazilian initiatives adopt almost all the principles of OGD and are in the third stage of a completely open linked data (three stars). Further, the strategy used by governments is the usage of citizen’s participation on contests and hackathons improving usage of OGD available by governments and created several applications for social control, transparency and better provision of public policies (transport, health, education, etc.). This work also adds an element inexistent on the literature known: strategies of dissemination and incentive of open data usage. The results indicate the existence of virtuous cycle of information when using public policy of open data is aligned with the implementation of the collection, analysis and opening data for several branches of city hall, and even that little data, but organized, can offer the possibility of citizen conduct social control, suggest improvements of the public service through studies and applications connected to processes performed by the city and local economic development.

Keywords

Open government data Smart government Participative government Transparency Brazil 

References

  1. ANATEL. (2013). Total mobile prepaid and postpaid access per Federal Unity in Brazil. Brasília, Federal District, Brazil. http://www.anatel.gov.br. Accessed 15 April 2014.
  2. Berners-Lee, T. (2012). 5 star deployment scheme for open data. http://5stardata.info/. Accessed 13 April 2014.
  3. Conradie, P., & Choenni, S. (2012). Exploring process barriers to release public sector information in local government. 6th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance (ICEGOV), Albany, New York, United States of America. doi:10.1145/2463728.2463731.Google Scholar
  4. Davies, T. (2010). Open data, democracy and public sector reform: A look at open government data use from data.gov.uk. Practical Participation.Google Scholar
  5. Dawes, S. S., & Helbig, N. (2010). Information strategies for open government: Challenges and prospects for deriving public value from government transparency. Electronic government (pp. 50–60). Berlin: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-14799-95.Google Scholar
  6. Diniz, V. (2010). How to achieve open government data. III Congress Consad of Public Management, Brasília, Federal Disctrict, Brazil.Google Scholar
  7. Diniz, E. H., Barbosa, A. F., Junqueira, A. R. B., & Prado, O. (2009). Electronic government in Brazil: A historical perspective from a structured model of analysis. Revista de Administração Pública (RAP), 43(1), 23–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eaves, D. (2009). The three laws of open government. http://eaves.ca/2009/09/30/three-law-of-open-government-data/. Accessed 10 April 2014.
  9. Frick, M. (2005). Parliaments in the digital age. Exploring Latin America. Global Centre for ICT in parliament. http://www.ictparliament.org/studies-and-reports/e-Parliament1739.html?order=title&sort=desc. Accessed 14 April 2014.
  10. Fung, A., & Weil, D. (2010). Open government and open society. Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Cambridge: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  11. Helbig, N., Cresswell, A. M., Burke, G. B., Pardo, T. A., & Luna-Reyes, L. (2012). Modeling the Informational Relationships between government and society: A pre-workshop white paper, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
  12. IBGE. (2010). CENSO 2010-Brazilian population and demography, Brasília, Federal District, Brazil. http://www.censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultados. Accessed 10 April 2014.
  13. IMF. (2011). World economic outlook (WEO) 2011-Slowing growth, rising risks. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  14. Janssen, M., Charalabidis, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lathrop, D., & Ruma, L. (2010). Open government: Collaboration, transparency, and participation in practice. Cambridge: O’Reilly Media.Google Scholar
  16. Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., Vaz, J. C., & De Souza, C. A. (2010). Using internet to promote the transparency and fight corruption: Latin American transparency portals. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 391–392). ACM, New York. doi:10.1145/1930321.1930411.Google Scholar
  17. Matheus, R., Ribeiro, M. M., & Vaz, J. C. (2012). New perspectives for electronic government in Brazil: The adoption of open government data in national and subnational governments of Brazil. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 22–29). ACM, New York. doi:10.1145/2463728.2463734.Google Scholar
  18. Matheus, R., Angelico, F., & Atoji, M. I. (2013). Open data in journalism: The limits and challenges of using strategies and creating social value chain encouraging transparency and social control in Latin America. Prize W3C Brazil-Open data for development in Latin America and Caribbean. Montevidéu. Disponível em: http://goo.gl/1siSyI. Accessed 12 April 2014.
  19. Mello, G. R. de, & Slomski, V. (2010). Electronic governance index of Brazilian states (2009): Within the executive branch. JISTEM-Journal of Information Systems and Technology Management, 7(2), 375–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Miranda, C., & Silva, N. (2010). National infrastructure open data. W3C Brasil EGov conference. http://www.w3c.br/conferenciaegov/05_INDA_Christian_Nitai.pdf. Accessed 8 April 2014.
  21. Nam, T. (2011). New ends, new means, but old attitudes: Citizens’ views on open government and government 2.0. System Sciences (HICSS), 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-10). doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.316.Google Scholar
  22. Obama, B. (2009). Memorandum for the heads of executive departments and agencies. Washington, DC. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/memoranda_2010/m10-06.pdf. Accessed 12 April 2014.
  23. OGP, O. G. P. (2011). Open government partnership brochure. www.opengovpartnership.org.
  24. O’Reilly, T., & Malamud, C. (2007). 8 principles of open government data. http://www.opengovdata.org/home/8principles. Accessed 1 April 2014.
  25. Parks, W. (1957). Open government principle: Applying the right to know under the constitution. The George Washington Law Review, 26, 1.Google Scholar
  26. Parycek, P., & Sachs, M. (2010). Open government-information flow in Web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, 9(1), 1–70.Google Scholar
  27. Pinho, J. (2008). Investigating states portals of electronic government in Brazil: Lots of technology, poor democracy. Revista de Administração Pública (RAP), 42(3), 471–493.Google Scholar
  28. Robinson, D., Yu, H., Zeller, W., & Felten, E. (2009). Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law & Technology, 11, 160.Google Scholar
  29. Sheridan, J., & Tennison, J. (2010). Linking UK government data. LWDO. http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2010/papers/ldow2010_paper14.pdf. Accessed 10 April 2014.
  30. Shotton, D. (2012). The five stars of online journal articles-a framework for article evaluation. http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january12/shotton/01shotton.html.
  31. Torkington, N. (2010). Rethinking open data. Weblog post. O’Reilly Radar. Cambridge: O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  32. Ventura, M. (2013). The law on access to information, privacy, and health research in Brazil. Cad. Saúde Pública (online), 29(4), 636–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. W3C. (2013). W3C Brazil. http://www.w3c.br/Home/WebHome. Accessed 12 April 2014.
  34. Yildiz, M. (2007). E-government research: Reviewing the literature, limitations, and ways forward. Government Information Quarterly, 24(3), 646–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2013). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17–29. (http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., Choenni, S., Meijer, R., & Sheikh_Alibaks, R. (2013). Socio-technical impediments of open data. Electronic Journal of eGovernment, 10, 156–172.Google Scholar
  37. Zuiderwijk, A., & Marijn J. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1) 17–29.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Matheus
    • 1
  • Manuella Maia Ribeiro
    • 2
  • José Carlos Vaz
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.School of Business Administration of São PauloGetulio Vargas FoundationBela Vista, São PauloBrazil
  3. 3.School of Arts, Sciences and Humanities, Course of Public Policy and ManagementUniversity of São PauloErmelino Matarazzo, São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations