Skip to main content

Endoscopic Resection: When Is EMR/ESD Sufficient?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 203))

Abstract

Endoscopic treatment of malignant lesions in the gastrointestinal tract can be treated curatively if the risk for lymph node metastasis is lower than 1%. In the lower gi-tract (colon and rectum) the low risk criteria for this situaiton are well-defined (G1/G2, LO, invasion depth ≤1000μm). However, en-bloc R0-resection is also mandatory. Benign lesions such as lateral spreading tumors (granular-type) can be also treated with piecemeal EMR, however, recurrence rate is up to 30%. All other cases, regardless of size, such as non-granular type lesions or mixed type lesions should be treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection. The definitive histopathology of the resected specimen allows further decision (e.g., surgery if invasion depth of tumor is >1000μm).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Nakamura M, Kakushima N, Kodashima N, Ono S, Kobayashi K, Hashimoto T, Yamamichi N, Tateishi A, Shimizu Y, Oka M, Ogura K, Kawabe T, Ichinose M, Omata M (2006) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal epithelial neoplasia. Endoscopy 38:493–497

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hochdörffer R, Eickhoff A, Apel D et al (2010) Endoscopic resection of “giant” colorectal lesions: long-term outcome and safety. Z Gastroenterol 48:741–747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hotta K, Fujii T, Saito Y et al (2009) Local recurrence after endoscopic resection of colorectal tumors. Int J Colorect Dis 24:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T et al (2013) Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 144:551–559

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kobayash N, Saito Y, Sano Y, Uragami N, Michita T, Nasu T, Matsuda T, Fu K, Fujii T, Fujimori T, Ishikawa T, Saito D (2007) Determining the treatment strategy for colorectal neoplastic lesions: endoscopic assessment or the non-lifting sign for diagnosing invasion depth? Endoscopy 39:701–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima T, Saito Y, Tanaka S et al (2013) Current status of endoscopic resection strategy for large, early colorectal neoplasia in Japan. Surg Endosc 27:3262–3270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pohl H, Srivastava A, Bensen SP et al (2013) Incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy—results of the complete adenoma resection (CARE) study. Gastroenterology 144:74–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Probst A, Golger D, Anthuber M, Märkl B, Messmann H (2012) Endoscopic submucosal dissection in large sessile lesions of the rectosigmoid: learning curve in a European center. Endoscopy 44:660–667

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y, Fukuzawa M, Matsuda T et al (2010) Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection. Surg Endosc 24:343–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saito Y, Otake Y, Sakamoto T et al (2013) Indications for and technical aspects of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 7:263–269

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmiegel W et al (2005) German S3-guideline conference colorectal cancer. Dtsch Med Wochensch 130(Suppl 1):S5–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I et al (2007) Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization. Gastrointest Endosc 66:100–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: present status and future perspective, including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection. J Gastroenterol 43:641–651

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka S, Terasaki M, Hayashi N et al (2013) Warning for unprincipled colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: accurate diagnosis and reasonable treatment strategy. Dig Endosc 25:107–116

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Uraoka T, Saito Y, Matsuda T et al (2006) Endoscopic indications for endoscopic mucosal resection of laterally spreading tumors in the colorectum. Gut 55:1592–1597

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Messmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Messmann, H. (2014). Endoscopic Resection: When Is EMR/ESD Sufficient?. In: Otto, F., Lutz, M. (eds) Early Gastrointestinal Cancers II: Rectal Cancer. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 203. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08060-4_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08059-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08060-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics