Advertisement

Improvement in Manufacturing Welded Products through Multiple Response Surface Methodology and Data Mining Techniques

  • Rubén Escribano-García
  • Rubén Lostado-Lorza
  • Roberto Fernández-Martínez
  • Pedro Villanueva-Roldán
  • Bryan J. Mac Donald
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 299)

Abstract

Gas Metal Arc Welding (GMAW) is an industrial process commonly used in manufacturing welded products. This manufacturing process is normally done by an industrial robot, which is controlled through the parameters of speed, current and voltage. These control parameters strongly influence the residual stress and the strength of the welded joint, as well as the total cost of manufacturing the welded components. Residual stress and tensile strength are commonly obtained via standardized hole-drilling and tensile tests which are very expensive to routinely carry out during the mass production of welded products. Over the past few decades, researchers have concentrated on improving the quality of manufacturing welded products using experimental analysis or trial-and-error results, but the cost of this methodology has proved unacceptable. Likewise, regression models based on Data Mining (DM) techniques have been used to improve various manufacturing processes, but usually require a relatively large amount of data in order to obtain acceptable results. By contrast, multiple response surface (MRS) methodology is a method for modelling and optimizing, which aims to identify the combination of input parameters that give the best output responses with a reduced number of data sets. In this paper, power consumption, cord area, tensile strength and tensile stress were modelled with quadratic regression (QR) models using Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and were compared with regression models based on DM (linear regression (LR), isotonic regression (IR), Gaussian processes (GP), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM) and regression trees (RT)). The optimization of the parameters was conducted using RSM with quadratic regression and desirability functions, and was achieved when the residual stresses and power consumption were as low as possible, while strength and process speed were as high as possible.

Keywords

Optimization Welding Process multiple response surface methodology Data Mining techniques 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Reina, M.: Soldadura de los Aceros. Aplicaciones. Weld-Work S.L., Madrid (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Corchado, E., Graña, M., Wozniak, M.: New trends and applications on hybrid artificial intelligence systems. Neurocomputing 75(1), 61–63 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Myers, R.H., Anderson-Cook, C.M.: Response surface methodology: process and product optimization using designed experiments. John Wiley & Sons (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ASTM E8-04, Standard Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic MaterialsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lakshminarayanan, A.K., Balasubramanian, V.: An assessment of microstructure, hardness, tensile and impact strength of friction stir welded ferritic stainless steel joints. Materials and Design 31, 4592–4600 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    ASTM E837 - 13a, Standard Test Method for Determining Residual Stresses by the Hole-Drilling Strain-Gage MethodGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fisher, R.A.: The design of experiments (1935)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Box, G.E., Behnken, D.W.: Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2(4), 455–475 (1960)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Myers, R.H.: Response surface methodology. Allyn-Bacon, Boston (1971)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taguchi, G.: Introduction to quality engineering: designing quality into products and processes (1986)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Myers, R.H.: Response Surface Methodology. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston (1971)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vaughn, N.A.: Design-Expert® software. Stat-Ease, Inc., Minneapolis (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Box, G.E., Wilson, K.B.: On the experimental attainment of optimum conditions. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 13(1), 1–45 (1951)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim, I.S., Son, K.J., Yang, Y.S., Yaragada, P.K.D.V.: Sensitivity analysis for process parameters in GMA welding processes using a factorial design method. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 43(8), 763–769 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olabi, A.G., Benyounis, K.Y., Hashmi, M.S.J.: Application of response surface methodology in describing the residual stress distribution in CO2 laser welding of AISI304. Strain 43(1), 37–46 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kim, I.S., Son, J.S., Yarlagadda, P.K.: A study on the quality improvement of robotic GMA welding process. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 19(6), 567–572 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kim, I.S., Son, J.S., Park, C.E., Kim, I.J., Kim, H.H.: An investigation into an intelligent system for predicting bead geometry in GMA welding process. Journal of Materials Processing Technology 159(1), 113–118 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Harrington, E.C.: The desirability function. Industrial Quality Control 21(10), 494–498 (1965)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Team, R.C.: R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H.: The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 11(1), 10–18 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rubén Escribano-García
    • 1
  • Rubén Lostado-Lorza
    • 1
  • Roberto Fernández-Martínez
    • 2
  • Pedro Villanueva-Roldán
    • 3
  • Bryan J. Mac Donald
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of La RiojaLogroñoSpain
  2. 2.Department of Material ScienceUniversity of Basque Country UPV/EHUBilbaoSpain
  3. 3.Rural Engineering Department and ProjectsPublic University of NavarrePamplonaSpain
  4. 4.School of Mechanical & Manufacturing EngineeringDublin City UniversityDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations