Skip to main content
Book cover

Progress in Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol II pp 135–150Cite as

The Application of Phase Change Materials to Improve the Climate Resilience of a Low-Energy Prototype House

Abstract

Due to a number of reasons including the effects of climate change and a shift towards a more widespread use of Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) for housing development, overheating issues in British homes has become a greater concern in recent years. Some of the most important advantages of MMC are the reduced use of materials, reduced construction time (particularly on site), reduced weather dependency, reduction of waste production, the possibility of reuse and recycling of components, and the possible lightness of the structure. MMC systems can deliver highly insulated, almost airtight homes, in line with requirements to reduce energy use for heating. However, they will generally have lower thermal mass than traditional construction and hence be less able to passively control temperature swings in warmer periods. This may contribute to uncomfortably high temperatures, which can affect the well-being and health of the occupants.

The Mark Group Research House, a super insulated steel frame home, was designed to test MMC solutions and innovative technologies, and to be highly energy efficient. In previous work done by the authors, a computer model was used to investigate the house’s potential for overheating in today’s weather as well as in future climate scenarios. The authors have found that the house was generally comfortable but, despite the addition of mitigating strategies, presented a high risk of overheating that was aggravated when the future climate was considered. This risk was partially attributed to the low levels of thermal mass in the house.

The integration of thermal mass, usually obtained through the use of exposed concrete or brick, can be problematical in MMC dwellings. The use of Phase Change Materials (PCM) may present a solution to this issue. PCM has been proven to work in a number of building applications but not much work has been undertaken investigating its applicability in housing. The work presented in this article reports on the integration of PCM in the Mark Group Research House as a solution to the overheating problem identified earlier. The results have shown that the PCM helps to regulate the temperatures in the house even when future climate scenarios are considered. However, it is only effective when coupled with an efficient ventilation strategy, which may not be an easy to implement solution because of its dependency on user behaviour.

Keywords

  • Thermal mass
  • Overheating

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_10
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-07977-6
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 10.1
Fig. 10.2
Fig. 10.3
Fig. 10.4

References

  1. Arup (2008) Your home in a changing climate. Three Regions Climate Change Group, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zero Carbon Hub (2010) Carbon compliance for tomorrows new homes—topic 3 future climate change. NHBC Foundation, London, Aug 2010. Report No. ZCHD130210

    Google Scholar 

  3. Holmes MJ, Hacker JN (2007) Climate change, thermal comfort and energy: meeting the design challenges of the 21st century. Energy Build 39(7):802–814

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Simon R (2008) Effects of climate change on the built environment. Energy Policy 36(12):4552–4557

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Hacker J, Capon R, Mylona A (2009) Use of climate change scenarios for building simulation: the CIBSE future weather years. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers (CIBSE), London

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sharma A, Tyagi VV, Chen CR, Buddhi D (2009) Review on thermal energy storage with phase change materials and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(2):318–345, Pubmed Central PMCID: PCM 03b

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Rodrigues L, Gillott M, Tetlow D (2013) Summer overheating potential in a low-energy steel frame house in future climate scenarios. J Sustain Cities Soc 7:1–15

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. UN-HABITAT (2008) State of the World’s Cities 2008/2009—harmonious cities programme (UNHS, ed.). Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jenkins G, Murphy J, Sexton D, Lowe J, Jones P, Kilsby C (2009) UK climate projections: briefing report. Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

    Google Scholar 

  10. Department for Communities and Local Government (2007) Homes for the future: more affordable, more sustainable. Communities and Local Government, London, July 2007. Report No.: Contract No.: Cm 7191

    Google Scholar 

  11. Department for Communities and Local Government (2009) Code for sustainable homes technical guide. Communities and Local Government Publications, London, p 68

    Google Scholar 

  12. Department for Communities and Local Government (2008) Definition of zero carbon homes and non-domestic buildings: consultation. London, 17 Dec 2008. Report No.: Contract No.: 08CCSD05675

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rodrigues L (2009) An investigation into the use of thermal mass to improve comfort in British housing. University of Nottingham, Nottingham

    Google Scholar 

  14. Orme M, Palmer J (2003) Control of overheating in future housing—design guidance for low energy strategies. DTI Partners in Innovation Programme, St Albans. Contract No.: EBR24763/9/1.2

    Google Scholar 

  15. EST (2005) Building energy efficient buildings using modern methods of construction (CE139). Energy Saving Trust and BRE, London, 23 Aug 2005. Report No.: Contract No.: CE139

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dunster B (2005) UK housing and climate change: heavyweight vs. lightweight construction. London, Jan 2005. Report No. 116210

    Google Scholar 

  17. EST (2005) Avoidance of overheating and airconditioning in urban housing. Energy Saving Trust and BRE, Watford, Mar 2005. Report No.: 221427

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hacker JN, Saulles TPD, Minson AJ, Holmes PMJ (2006) Embodied and operational carbon dioxide emissions from housing: a case study on the effects of thermal mass and climate change. Build 40(3):375–384

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rodrigues L, Gillott M (eds) (2011) The summer performance of the BASF house. PLEA 2011—27th conference on passive and low energy architecture, 13–15 July 2011. Presses Universitaires de Louvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  20. Littlefair P (2005) Avoiding air-conditioning. Constr Future 24:11

    Google Scholar 

  21. Agyenim F, Hewitt N, Eames P, Smyth M (2010) A review of materials, heat transfer and phase change problem formulation for latent heat thermal energy storage systems (LHTESS). Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14(2):615–628

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Arteconi A, Hewitt NJ, Polonara F (2012) State of the art of thermal storage for demand-side management. Appl Energy 93:371–389

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Baetens R, Jelle BP, Gustavsen A (2010) Phase change materials for building applications: a state-of-the-art review. Energy Build 42(9):1361–1368

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Farid MM, Khudhair AM, Razack SAK, Al-Hallaj S (2004) A review on phase change energy storage: materials and applications. Energy Convers Manag 45:1597–1615

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Tyagi VV, Buddhi D (2007) PCM thermal storage in buildings: a state of art. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 11(6):1146–1166, Pubmed Central PMCID: PCM 03a

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Alkan C, Sarı A, Karaipekli A (2011) Preparation, thermal properties and thermal reliability of microencapsulated n-eicosane as novel phase change material for thermal energy storage. Energy Convers Manag 52(1):687–692

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Sarı A, Alkan C, Karaipekli A, Uzun O (2009) Microencapsulated n-octacosane as phase change material for thermal energy storage. Sol Energy 83(10):1757–1763

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Tyagi VV, Kaushik SC, Tyagi SK, Akiyama T (2011) Development of phase change materials based microencapsulated technology for buildings: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(2):1373–1391

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang YP, Lin KP, Yang R, Di HF, Jiang Y (2006) Preparation, thermal performance and application of shape-stabilized PCM in energy efficient buildings. Energy Build 38(10):1262–1269

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. Darkwa J (2009) Mathematical evaluation of a buried phase change concrete cooling system for buildings. Appl Energy 86(5):706–711

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  31. Cabeza LF, Ibanez M, Sole C, Roca J, Nogués M (2006) Experimentation with a water tank including a PCM module. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 90:1273–1282, Epub x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  32. Ibanez M, Cabeza LF, Sole C, Roca J, Nogués M (2006) Modelization of a water tank including a PCM module. Appl Therm Eng 26:1328–1333, Epub s

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  33. Mehling H, Cabeza LF, Hippeli S, Hiebler S (2003) PCM-module to improve hot water heat stores with stratification. Renew Energy 28:699–711, Epub x

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Alawadhi EM (2008) Thermal analysis of a building brick containing phase change material. Energy Build 40(3):351–357

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  35. Darkwa K, O’Callaghan PW, Tetlow D (2006) Phase-change drywalls in a passive-solar building. Appl Energy 83(5):425–435

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuznik F, David D, Johannes K, Roux J-J (2011) A review on phase change materials integrated in building walls. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):379–391

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Rodrigues L, Gillott M (2013) The climate resilience of a low-energy prototype house. Proc ICE Eng Sustain 166:337–350

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Gillott M, Rodrigues LT, Spataru C (2010) Low-carbon housing design informed by research. Proc ICE Eng Sustain 163(2):77–87

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Gorgolewski M (2007) Framing systems and thermal mass. Mod Steel Constr 47:45–48

    Google Scholar 

  40. EST (2005) Reducing overheating—a designer’s guide. Energy Saving Trust, London, Mar 2005. Report No.: Contract No.: CE129

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kennett S (2005) Domestic bliss. Build Serv J (May 2005):42–45. Pubmed Central PMCID: EAHE 56*

    Google Scholar 

  42. CIBSE (2006) Guide A: environmental design, 7th edn. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK

    Lucelia Rodrigues, David Tetlow, Mark Gillott & Vasileios Sougkakis

Authors
  1. Lucelia Rodrigues
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Tetlow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Gillott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vasileios Sougkakis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucelia Rodrigues .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario, Canada

    Ibrahim Dincer

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey

    Adnan Midilli

  3. Department of Mechanical Engineering Faculty of Engineering, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan University, Rize, Turkey

    Haydar Kucuk

Nomenclature

Nomenclature

ACH:

Air changes per hour

CEH:

Creative Energy Homes

DSY:

Design summer year

EAHE:

Earth-air heat exchanger

FF:

First floor

GF:

Ground floor

HDPE:

High density polythene

MMC:

Modern methods of construction

PCM:

Phase change materials

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rodrigues, L., Tetlow, D., Gillott, M., Sougkakis, V. (2014). The Application of Phase Change Materials to Improve the Climate Resilience of a Low-Energy Prototype House. In: Dincer, I., Midilli, A., Kucuk, H. (eds) Progress in Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol II. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07977-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07976-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07977-6

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)