Abstract
The first natural plant mutant for which the molecular basis was determined to be an epimutation rather than a change in DNA sequence was a peloric variant of toadflax, Linaria vulgaris. Remarkably, the second example of a natural epimutant came from the vegetable fleshy-fruited crop tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). The discovery of the molecular basis for the Colorless nonripening (Cnr) epimutation was a landmark for plant epigenetics and, importantly, linked epigenetic mechanisms with an important agronomical trait. More recently, several studies on tomato have contributed to our better understanding of epigenetic mechanisms underlying important heritable crop traits, such as ripening and stress response. Epigenetic mechanisms have also been associated with transgressive segregation in hybrids generated from crosses between cultivated tomato and close wild relatives. Therefore, we can only envision that tomato will became a model for studying the epigenetic basis of economically important phenotypes, allowing for their more efficient exploitation in plant breeding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aiese Cigliano R, Sanseverino W, Cremona G et al (2013) Genome-wide analysis of histone modifiers in tomato: gaining an insight into their developmental roles. BMC Genomics 14:57
ARKive (2013) Galápagos tomato (Solanum cheesmaniae). http://www.arkive.org/galapagos-tomato/solanum-cheesmaniae. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
Bai Y, Lindhout P (2007) Domestication and breeding of tomatoes: what have we gained and what can we gain in the future? Ann Bot 100:1085–1094
Bai M, Yang GS, Chen WT et al (2012) Genome-wide identification of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene families and their expression analyses in response to viral infection and abiotic stresses in Solanum lycopersicum. Gene 501:52–62
Berger Y, Harpaz-Saad S, Brand A et al (2009) The NAC-domain transcription factor GOBLET specifies leaflet boundaries in compound tomato leaves. Development 136:823–832
Birchler JA, Yao H, Chudalayandi S et al (2010) Heterosis. Plant Cell 22:2105–2112
Bomblies K, Weigel D (2007) Hybrid necrosis: autoimmunity as a potential gene-flow barrier in plant species. Nat Rev Genet 8:382–393
Boyko A, Kovalchuk I (2008) Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ Mol Mutagen 49:61–72
Brodersen P, Voinnet O (2006) The diversity of RNA silencing pathways in plants. Trends Genet 22:268–280
Burge GK, Morgan ER, Seelye JF (2002) Opportunities for synthetic plant chimeral breeding: past and future. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 70:13–21
Chen D, Meng Y, Yuan C et al (2011) Plant siRNAs from introns mediate DNA methylation of host genes. RNA 17:1012–1024
Chu G, Chang E (1988) Xeroderma pigmentosum group E cells lack a nuclear factor that binds to damaged DNA. Science 242:564–567
Cubas P, Vincent C, Coen E (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161
Darwin C (1868) The variation of animals and plants under domestication. John Murray, London
Ding D, Zhang LF, Wang H et al (2009) Differential expression of miRNAs in response to salt stress in maize roots. Ann Bot 103:29–38
Dumbliauskas E, Lechner E, Jaciubek M et al (2011) The Arabidopsis CUL4-DDB1 complex interacts with MSI1 and is required to maintain MEDEA parental imprinting. EMBO J 30:731–743
Eriksson EM, Bovy A, Manning K et al (2004) Effect of the Colorless non-ripening mutation on cell wall biochemistry and gene expression during tomato fruit development and ripening. Plant Physiol 136:4184–4197
FAO (2013) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org. Accessed 5 Feb 2014
Ferreira e Silva GF, Silva EM, Azevedo Mda S et al (2014) microRNA156-targeted SPL/SBP box transcription factors regulate tomato ovary and fruit development. Plant J 78:604–618
Gillpasy G, Ben-David H, Gruissem W (1993) Fruits: a developmental perspective. Plant Cell 5:1439–1451
González RM, Ricardi MM, Iusem ND (2011) Atypical epigenetic mark in an atypical location: cytosine methylation at asymmetric (CNN) sites within the body of a non-repetitive tomato gene. BMC Plant Biol 11:94
González RM, Ricardi MM, Iusem ND (2013) Epigenetic marks in an adaptive water stress-responsive gene in tomato roots under normal and drought conditions. Epigenetics 8:864–872
Hamzeiy H, Allmer J, Yousef M (2014) Computational methods for microRNA target prediction. In: Yousef M, Allmer J (eds) miRNomics: microRNA biology and computational analysis. Methods in molecular biology, vol 1107. Springer, New York, pp 207–221
Haroldsen VM, Szczerba MW, Aktas H et al (2012) Mobility of transgenic nucleic acids and proteins within grafted rootstocks for agricultural improvement. Front Plant Sci 3:39
Higa LA, Wu M, Ye T et al (2006) CUL4-DDB1 ubiquitin ligase interacts with multiple WD40-repeat proteins and regulates histone methylation. Nat Cell Biol 8:1277–1283
Jia XY, Wang WX, Ren LG et al (2009) Differential and dynamic regulation of miR398 in response to ABA and salt stress in Populus tremula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol Biol 71:51–59
Joubès J, Phan TH, Just D et al (1999) Molecular and biochemical characterization of the involvement of cyclin-dependent kinase A during the early development of tomato fruit. Plant Physiol 121:857–869
Kalisz S, Purugganan MD (2004) Epialleles via DNA methylation: consequences for plant evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:309–314
Kapoor M, Arora R, Lama T et al (2008) Genome-wide identification, organization and phylogenetic analysis of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene families and their expression analysis during reproductive development and stress in rice. BMC Genomics 9:451
Karlova R, van Haarst JC, Maliepaard C et al (2013) Identification of microRNA targets in tomato fruit development using high-throughput sequencing and degradome analysis. J Exp Bot 64:1863–1878
Kouzarides T (2007) Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell 128:693–705
Kuang H, Padmanabhan C, Li F et al (2009) Identification of miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) and biogenesis of their siRNAs in the Solanaceae: new functional implications for MITEs. Genome Res 19:42–56
Lindroth AM, Cao X, Jackson JP et al (2001) Requirement of CHROMOMETHYLASE3 for maintenance of CpXpG methylation. Science 292:2077–2080
Liu J, Tang X, Gao L et al (2012) A role of tomato UV-damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1) in organ size control via an epigenetic manner. PLoS One 7:e42621
Lu C, Chen J, Zhang Y et al (2012) Miniature inverted-repeat transposable elements (MITEs) have been accumulated through amplification bursts and play important roles in gene expression and species diversity in Oryza sativa. Mol Biol Evol 29:1005–1017
Manning K, Tör M, Poole M et al (2006) A naturally occurring epigenetic mutation in a gene encoding an SBP-box transcription factor inhibits tomato fruit ripening. Nat Genet 38:948–952
Martel C, Vrebalov J, Tafelmeyer P et al (2011) The tomato MADS-box transcription factor RIPENING INHIBITOR interacts with promoters involved in numerous ripening processes in a COLORLESS NONRIPENING-dependent manner. Plant Physiol 157:1568–1579
Martienssen R, Colot V (2001) DNA methylation and epigenetic inheritance in plants and filamentous fungi. Science 293:1070–1074
Mohorianu I, Schwach F, Jing R et al (2011) Profiling of short RNAs during fleshy fruit development reveals stage-specific sRNAome expression patterns. Plant J 67:232–246
Molnar A, Melnyk CW, Bassett A et al (2010) Small silencing RNAs in plants are mobile and direct epigenetic modification in recipient cells. Science 328:872–875
Montgomery TA, Howell MD, Cuperus JT et al (2008) Specificity of ARGONAUTE7-miR390 interaction and dual functionality in TAS3 trans-acting siRNA formation. Cell 133:128–141
Moxon S, Jing R, Szittya G et al (2008) Deep sequencing of tomato short RNAs identifies microRNAs targeting genes involved in fruit ripening. Genome Res 18:1602–1609
Nuez F, Provens J, Blanca JM (2004) Relationships, origin, and diversity of Galapagos tomatoes: implications for the conservation of natural populations. Am J Bot 91:86–99
Ori N, Cohen AR, Etzioni A et al (2007) Regulation of LANCEOLATE by miR319 is required for compound-leaf development in tomato. Nat Genet 39:787–791
Ortiz-Morea FA, Vicentini R, Silva GF et al (2013) Global analysis of the sugarcane microtranscriptome reveals a unique composition of small RNAs associated with axillary bud outgrowth. J Exp Bot 64:2307–2320
Paterson AH, Bowers JE, Bruggmann R et al (2009) The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457:551–556
Pekker I, Alvarez JP, Eshed Y (2005) Auxin response factors mediate Arabidopsis organ asymmetry via modulation of KANADI activity. Plant Cell 17:2899–2910
Peralta IE, Spooner DM (2005) Morphological characterization and relationships of wild tomatoes (Solanum L. Section Lycopersicon). In: Keating RC, Hollowell VC, Croat TB (eds) A Festschrift for William G. D'arcy: the legacy of a taxonomist. Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, IL, pp 227–257
Piriyapongsa J, Mariño-Ramírez L, Jordan IK (2007) Origin and evolution of human microRNAs from transposable elements. Genetics 176:1323–1337
Preston JC, Hileman LC (2013) Functional evolution in the plant SQUAMOSA-PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE (SPL) gene family. Front Plant Sci 4:80
Qian Y, Cheng Y, Cheng X et al (2011) Identification and characterization of Dicer-like, Argonaute and RNA-dependent RNA polymerase gene families in maize. Plant Cell Rep 30:1347–1363
Rieseberg LH, Archer MA, Wayne RK (1999) Transgressive segregation, adaptation and speciation. Heredity 83:363–372
Sadeh R, Allis CD (2011) Genome-wide “re”-modeling of nucleosome positions. Cell 147:263–266
Salinas M, Xing S, Höhmann S et al (2012) Genomic organization, phylogenetic comparison and differential expression of the SBP-box family of transcription factors in tomato. Planta 235:1171–1184
Seymour G, Poole M, Manning K et al (2008) Genetics and epigenetics of fruit development and ripening. Curr Opin Plant Biol 11:58–63
Shivaprasad PV, Dunn RM, Santos BA et al (2012) Extraordinary transgressive phenotypes of hybrid tomato are influenced by epigenetics and small silencing RNAs. EMBO J 31:257–266
Stadler MB, Murr R, Burger L et al (2011) DNA-binding factors shape the mouse methylome at distal regulatory regions. Nature 480:490–495
Stegemann S, Keuthe M, Greiner S et al (2012) Horizontal transfer of chloroplast genomes between plant species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2434–2438
Tang X, Liu J, Huang S et al (2012) Roles of UV-damaged DNA binding protein 1 (DDB1) in epigenetically modifying multiple traits of agronomic importance in tomato. Plant Signal Behav 7:1529–1532
Teixeira FK, Colot V (2009) Gene body DNA methylation in plants: a means to an end or an end to a means? EMBO J 28:997–998
Teyssier E, Bernacchia G, Maury S et al (2008) Tissue dependent variations of DNA methylation and endoreduplication levels during tomato fruit development and ripening. Planta 228:391–399
The Arabidopsis Genome Initiative (2000) Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature 408:796–815
The Tomato Genome Consortium (2012) The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature 485:635–641
Thompson AJ, Tor M, Barry CS et al (1999) Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiol 120:383–390
Thyssen G, Svab Z, Maliga P (2012) Cell-to-cell movement of plastids in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:2439–2443
Vrebalov J, Ruezinsky D, Padmanabhan V et al (2002) A MADS-box gene necessary for fruit ripening at the tomato ripening-inhibitor (rin) locus. Science 296:343–346
Wang WS, Pan YJ, Zhao XQ et al (2011) Drought-induced site-specific DNA methylation and its association with drought tolerance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Exp Bot 62:1951–1960
Wu R, Wang X, Lin Y et al (2013) Inter-species grafting caused extensive and heritable alterations of DNA methylation in Solanaceae plants. PLoS One 8:e61995
Xian Z, Yang Y, Huang W et al (2013) Molecular cloning and characterisation of SlAGO family in tomato. BMC Plant Biol 13:126
Yifhar T, Pekker I, Peled D et al (2012) Failure of the tomato trans-acting short interfering RNA program to regulate AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 and ARF4 underlies the wiry leaf syndrome. Plant Cell 24:3575–3589
Zamir D, Tanksley SD (1988) Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast-evolving, low copy-number sequences. Mol Gen Genet 213:254–261
Zanca AS, Vicentini R, Ortiz-Morea FA et al (2010) Identification and expression analysis of microRNAs and targets in the biofuel crop sugarcane. BMC Plant Biol 10:260
Zhang X, Yazaki J, Sundaresan A et al (2006) Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 126:1189–1201
Zhang J, Zeng R, Chen J et al (2008) Identification of conserved microRNAs and their targets from Solanum lycopersicum Mill. Gene 423:1–7
Zhang X, Zou Z, Zhang J et al (2011) Over-expression of sly-miR156a in tomato results in multiple vegetative and reproductive trait alterations and partial phenocopy of the sft mutant. FEBS Lett 585:435–439
Zhong S, Fei Z, Chen YR et al (2013) Single-base resolution methylomes of tomato fruit development reveal epigenome modifications associated with ripening. Nat Biotechnol 31:154–159
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nogueira, F.T.S. (2014). Tomato Epigenetics: Deciphering the “Beyond” Genetic Information in a Vegetable Fleshy-Fruited Crop. In: Epigenetics in Plants of Agronomic Importance: Fundamentals and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07971-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07971-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07970-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07971-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)