A Six Cell Services Comparison Model for Healthcare

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 177)

Abstract

Healthcare services delivery is particularly complex. Understanding patients’ perception and channeling those factors into services design and operation enhances sustainability. For its survival, a service must perform better than competition. Comparison with competition is a core element of House-of-Quality. There are isolated studies focused on single service systems, and very few studies on inter-system comparison. In the quest to identify the distinguishing factors of mHealth from other conventional services, the author realized the pressing need for a systematic model to relatively position comparison studies. Services comparison vis-à-vis competition is vital for services innovation. To fill this gap in literature, a Six Cell Services Comparison Model (SCSCM) is proposed and is applied to a few studies related to healthcare. The outcomes of services comparison, provides vital measures for improved and efficient design of services that meet and fulfill patients’ needs, and hence contribute to quality healthcare.

Keywords

Healthcare (SCSCM) House of Quality (HoQ) Services design Mobile health (mHealth) 

References

  1. 1.
    Motamarri, S.: Distinguishing mHealth from other health care alternatives in developing countries: a study on service characteristics. Dissertation, School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia, pp. 1–191 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Motamarri, S., Akter, S., Ray, P., Tseng, C.-L.: Distinguishing ‘mHealth’ from other healthcare services in a developing country: a study from the service quality perspective. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 34, Article 34, 669–692 (2014) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hwang, J., Christensen, C.M.: Disruptive innovation in health care delivery: a framework for business-model innovation. Health Aff. 27(5), 1329–1335 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lim, J.S., Zallocco, R.: Determinant attributes in formulation of attitudes toward four health care systems. J. Health Care Mark. 8(2), 25–30 (1988)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Evenson, S.: Design thinking for innovative healthcare service. In: AHRQ Annual Conference, 08 Sept 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ghose, A.: Services research in Australia: a roadmap. In: Australian Symposium on Services Research and Innovation, Sydney (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Economist: Squeezing out the doctor. In: The Economsit 2012, The Economist Newspaper Limited, London (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    OGC, ITIL, Version 3, Office of Government Commerce, The Stationery Office, London (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hauser, J.R., Clausing, D.: The house of quality. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66(3), 63–73 (1988)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ray, P.K.: Integrated Management from E-Business Perspective: Concepts, Architectures and Methodologies. Kluwer, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramaswamy, R.: Design and Management of Service Processes: Keeping Customers for Life. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1996)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dieter, G., Schmidt, L.: Engineering Design, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keaveney, S.M.: Customer switching behavior in service industries: an exploratory study. J. Mark. 59(2), 71–82 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heje, H.N., Olesen, F.: Patients’ evaluations as quality measurements in general practice. Ugeskr. Laeger 164(46), 5386–5389 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Andaleeb, S.S.: Service quality perceptions and patient satisfaction: a study of hospitals in a developing country. Soc. Sci. Med. 52(9), 1359–1370 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Andaleeb, S.S., Siddiqui, N., Khandakar, S.: Patient satisfaction with health services in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plann. 22(4), 263–273 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Petek, D., et al.: Patients’ evaluations of European general practice—revisited after 11 years. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 23(6), 621–628 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramsay, J., et al.: The General Practice Assessment Survey (GPAS): tests of data quality and measurement properties. Fam. Pract. 17(5), 372–379 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Thorsen, H., et al.: The purpose of the general practice consultation from the patient’s perspective—theoretical aspects. Fam. Pract. 18(6), 638–643 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ware, J.E.J., et al.: Consumer perceptions of health care services: implications for academic medicine. Acad. Med. 50(9), 839–848 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., Ray, P.: User perceived service quality of m-Health services in developing countries. In: 18th European Conference on Information Systems (2010)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Akter, S. Ray, P.: mHealth - An Ultimate Platform to Serve the Unserved. IMIA Yearbook of Medical Informatics, pp. 94–100. Schattauer, Germany (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., Ray, P.: Service quality of mHealth platforms: development and validation of a hierarchical model using PLS. Electron. Markets 20(3), 209–227 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Akter, S., D’Ambra, J., Ray, P.: Trustworthiness in mHealth information services: an assessment of a hierarchical model with mediating and moderating effects using partial least squares (PLS). J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 62(1), 100–116 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lovelock, C., Wirtz, J.: Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy, 7th edn. Prentice Hall, Boston (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Berkowitz, E.N., Hillestad, S.G.: Evolution of tripartite model of hospital selection. In: Procedings from Advances in Health Care Research, Association for Consumer Research (1982)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Wright, N.D., Parsons, R.J.: Consumers’ selection of hospital maternity care. In: Proceedings from Advances in Health Care Research, Association for Consumer Research, Snowbird, UT (1982)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    van den Brink-Muinen, A., et al.: Do our talks with patients meet their expectations? J. Fam. Pract. 56(7), 559 (2007)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Haverkamp, D., et al.: The validity of patient satisfaction as single question in outcome measurement of total hip arthroplasty. J. Long Term Eff. Med. Implants 18(2), 145–150 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Andaleeb, S.S.: Public and private hospitals in Bangladesh: service quality and predictors of hospital choice. Health Policy Plann. 15(1), 95–102 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A., Berry, L.L.: SERVQUAL: a multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions. J. Retail. 64(1), 12–40 (1988)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Malhotra, N.: Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation, 4th edn. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle River (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hair, J.F.J., et al.: Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Ivatury, G., Moore, J., Bloch, A.: A doctor in your pocket: health hotlines in developing countries. Innovations Technol. Gov. Globalization 4(1), 119–153 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    World Bank: World Development Report: Making Services Work for Poor People. World Bank, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Siddiqui, N., Khandaker, S.A.: Comparison of services of public, private and foreign hospitals from the perspective of Bangladeshi patients. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 25(2), 221–230 (2007)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Information Systems, Technology and Management, Australian School of BusinessUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations