Advertisement

Understanding a Transformation Process from Product-Centric to Customer-Centric Services in a Financial Institution - A Work System Perspective

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 177)

Abstract

This research aims to contribute to building an increased understanding of the strategic, business, cultural as well as other changes in an organisation’s transition process from product-centric to customer-centric services. This paper offers an exploratory case study conducted in a complex financial organisation in the context of their customer-facing services. The transition process is examined through a theoretical lens of the Work System Theory (WST), following the argument previously made by other researchers that service systems could be seen as work systems. This holistic theory enabled the researchers to capture the three key phases of the transition process as work systems snapshots and show the manner in which the transitions occurred from one phase to another. More importantly, WST enabled an in-depth study of the transition process through the complex and unfolding interplay of strategy, customers, products and services, processes, people, information and technology, tracing the key challenges and success factors.

Keywords

Customer-centric services Financial services Case study Work System Theory Qualitative research Customer-centric transformation 

References

  1. 1.
    Chesbrough, H., Spohrer, J.: A research manifesto for services sciences. Commun. ACM 49(7), 35–40 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vargo, S.L., Lusch, F.L.: Service dominant logic: continuing the evolution. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 36(1), 1–10 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    IFM and IBM: Succeeding through service innovation: a service perspective for education, research, business and government. University of Cambridge Institute for Manufacturing, Cambridge, UK (2008). http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ssme Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Maglio, P.S., Spohrer, J.: Fundamentals of service sciences. J. Acad. Market. Sci. 36(1), 18–20 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bitner, M.J., Brown, S., Goul, M., Urban, S.: Service science journey: foundations, progress, and challenges. ASU Center for Services LeadershipGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spohrer, J.S., Demirkan, H., Krishna, V.: Service and science. In: Demirkan, H., et al. (eds.) The Science of Service Systems: Service Science: Research and Innovations in the Service Economy, pp 325–358. Springer, San Jose (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alter, S.: Work system theory: overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 14(2), 72–121 (2013). (Article 1)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alter, S.: Viewing systems as services: a fresh approach in the IS field. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 26, 195–224 (2010). (Article 11)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alter, S.: Work system theory: an integrated, evolving body of assumptions, concepts, frameworks, and principles for analyzing and designing systems in organizations. In: Proceedings of JAIS Theory Development Workshop. Sprouts: Working Papers on IS, vol. 10, no. 80 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Alter, S.: Bridging the chasm between sociotechnical and technical views of systems in organisations. In: Proceedings of the ICIS 2010 Conference, St. Louis, Dec 2010, AIS. Paper 54 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Alter, S.: Defining information systems as work systems: implications for the IS field. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 448–469 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Alter, S.: Work systems and IT artifacts: does the definition matter? Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17, 299–313 (2006). (Article 14)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Alter, S.: A work system view of DSS in its forth decade. Decis. Support Syst. 38, 319–327 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alter, S.: The work system method for understanding information systems and information systems research. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst 9, 23–39 (2002). (Article 6)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Alter, S.: A general, yet useful theory of information systems. In: Proceedings of the AMCIS 2000, AIS. Paper 22 (2000)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Alter, S.: A general yet useful theory of information systems. Commun. AIS 1(13), 1–70 (1999)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Demirkan, H., Kauffman, R.J., Vayghan, J.A., Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D., Maglio, P.P.: Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electron. Commer. Res. Appl. 7, 356–376 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.P., Biley, J., Gruhl, D.: Steps towards a science of service systems. IEEE Comput. 40(1), 71–78 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S., O’Brien, M.: Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J. Retail. 83(1), 5–18 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bitner, M.J., Brown, S.W.: The service imperative. Bus. Horiz. 51, 39–46 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bharadwaj, S.G., Varadarajan, R.P., Fahy, J.: Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: a conceptual model and research propositions. J. Market. 57, 83–99 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karpen, I.O., Bove, L.L., Lukas, B.A.: Linking service-dominant logic and strategic business practice: a conceptual model of a service-dominant orientation. J. Serv. Res. 15(1), 21–38 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Oliva, R., Kallenberg, R.: Managing the transaction from products to services. Int. J. Serv. Ind. Manag. 14(2), 160–172 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rust, R.T., Miu, C.: What academic research tells us about service. Commun. ACM 49(7), 49–54 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Straus, B.: International service research – status Quo, developments, and consequences for the emerging services sciences. In: Straus, B., et al. (eds.) Service Sciences: Fundamentals, Challenges and Future Opportunities, pp. 57–70. Springer, Berlin (2008)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ostrom, A.L., et al.: Moving forward and making a difference: research priorities for the science of service. J. Serv. Res. 42(1), 1–33 (2010) Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yin, R.K.: Applications of Case Study Research. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, London (2003)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Yin, R.K.: Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Sage, Newbury Park (1994)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Feagin, J., Orum, A., Sjoberg, G. (eds.): A Case for Case Study. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill (1991)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singleton, R.A., Straits, B.C.: Approaches to Social Research, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Walsham, G.: Doing interpretive research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 15, 320–330 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hammersley, M.: The Dilemma of Qualitative Research: Herbert Blumer and the Chicago Tradition. Routledge, London (1989)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cuganesan, S., Dumay, J.: Reflecting on the production of intellectual capital visualizations. Account. Audit. Account. J. 22(8), 1161–1186 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Llewellyn, S.: Methodological themes: narratives in accounting and management research. Account. Audit. Account. J. 12(2), 220–236 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Amaratunga, D., Baldry, D.: Case study methodology as a means of theory building: performance measurement in facilities management organisations. Work Study 50(3), 95–105 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Deetz, S.: Describing differences in approaches to organization science: rethinking Burrell and Morgan and their legacy. Org. Sci. 7(2), 191–207 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Geertz, C.: The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Szmigin, I., Foxall, G.: Interpretive consumer research: how far have we come? Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J. 3(4), 187–197 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Crowley, C., Harre, R., Tagg, C.: Qualitative research and computing: methodological issues and practices in using QSR NVivo and NUD*IST. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. 5(3), 193–197 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of Sydney Business SchoolSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations