Skip to main content

Clinical Efficacy of Novel Image Processing Techniques in the Framework of Filtered Back Projection (FBP) with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT)

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNIP,volume 8539)


Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) slices are reconstructed from projections acquired within a limited angular range. Out-of-plane artifacts are inevitable in reconstructed DBT images. In this study, we evaluated novel image processing techniques in the framework of filtered backprojection (FBP) and compared the results with reconstruction using a previously used FBP method. The novel FBP reconstruction has an adapted filter kernel, uses unbinned projections, performs an adaptive collapsing scheme and statistical artifact reduction, and applies iterative filtering in the image domain. Fifty-four image pairs were evaluated by three experienced radiologists. The images were compared on a 7-point scale (-3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, and +3) according to the following five categories: (1) visibility of noise, (2) diagnostic certainty regarding masses, (3) diagnostic certainty regarding microcalcifications, (4) visibility of structures in the pectoral muscle, and (5) overall image quality. The results showed a statistically significant superiority of the novel FBP reconstruction in comparison with standard FBP (p < 0.05). In particular, the improvement of the diagnostic certainty related to microcalcifications with the novel FBP is noteworthy.


This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Poplack, S.P., Tosteson, T.D., Kogel, C.A., et al.: Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography. AJR 189(3), 616–623 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Andersson, I., Ikeda, D.M., Zackrisson, S., et al.: Breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography: a comparison of breast cancer visibility and BIRADS classification in a population of cancers with subtle mammographic findings. Eur. Radiol. 18(12), 2817–2825 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Good, W.F., Abrams, G.S., Catullo, V.J., et al.: Digital breast tomosynthesis: a pilot observer study. AJR 190(4), 865–869 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Gennaro, G., Toledano, A., Di Maggio, C., et al.: Digital breast tomosynthesis versus digital mammography: a clinical performance study. Eur. Radiol. 20(7), 1545–1553 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Uchiyama, N., Kinoshita, T., Akashi, S., et al.: Diagnostic Performance of Combined Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT) in comparison with Full Field Digital Mammography (FFDM). In: CARS 2011, pp. 32–33. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Förnvik, D., Zackrisson, S., Ljungberg, O., et al.: Breast tomosynthesis: Accuracy of tumor measurement compared with digital mammography and ultrasonography. Acta. Radiol. 51(3), 240–247 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dobbins, J.T., Godfrey, D.J.: Digital x-ray tomosynthesis: current state of the art and clinical potential. Phys. Med. Biol. 106, R65–R106 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rinkel, J., Dillon, W.P., Funk, T., Gould, R., Prevrhal, S.: Computed tomographic metal artifact reduction for the detection and quantitation of small features near large metallic implants: a comparison of published methods. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 32(4), 621–629 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mertelmeier, T., Orman, J., Haerer, W., et al.: Optimizing filtered backprojection reconstruction for a breast tomosynthesis prototype device. In: Proc. SPIE Medical Imaging 2006, vol. 6142, p. 61420F (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wu, T., Moore, R.H., Kopans, D.B.: Voting strategy for artifact reduction in digital breast tomosynthesis. Medical Physics 33, 24612471 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Abdurahman, S., Jerebko, A., Mertelmeier, T., Lasser, T., Navab, N.: Out-of-Plane Artifact Reduction in Tomosynthesis Based on Regression Modeling and Outlier Detection. In: Maidment, A.D.A., Bakic, P.R., Gavenonis, S. (eds.) IWDM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7361, pp. 729–736. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Abdurahman, S., Dennerlein, F., Jerebko, A., Fieselmann, A., Mertelmeier, T.: Optimizing high resolution reconstruction. In: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis using Filtered Back Projection. accepted at IWDM 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Uchiyama, N. et al. (2014). Clinical Efficacy of Novel Image Processing Techniques in the Framework of Filtered Back Projection (FBP) with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT). In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics