Advertisement

Instructional Activities in a Discussion Board Forum of an e-Leaning Management System

  • Yanfei Ma
  • Cathryn Friel
  • Wanli Xing
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 435)

Abstract

This study was primarily interested in dynamic interactions between instructors and an e-learning Management System (Blackboard) with specific focus on the discussion board forum. We examined how instructors seek information to assess students’ input in an e-learning discussion board forum and determined which pedagogical features need to be improved to facilitate instructional activities. The findings suggest that the ability to easily track and respond to students’ post is the most important instructional activity to instructors while reading student posts and replying to students are the most frequent instructional activities. Interacting with students and facilitating group discussion are the most difficult instructional activities. Therefore, this study indicated that Blackboard discussion board designers may need to improve discussion board pedagogical features to make interaction with students and facilitating group discussion more convenient and accessible for instructors who must now forage for the information they need to assess student contributions.

Keywords

E-learning management system Blackboard discussion board information foraging theory instructional activities pedagogical features 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arbaugh, J.B., Benbunan-Fich, R.: The importance of participant interaction in online environments. Decision Support Systems 43(3), 853–865 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blignaut, A.S., Trollip, S.R.: Measuring Faculty Participation in Asynchronous Discussion Forums. Journal of Education for Business 78(6), 347–353 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bouhnik, D., Marcus, T.: Interaction in distance-learning courses. Journal of the American Society Information Science and Technology 57(3), 299–305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheung, W.S., Hew, K.F.: Evaluating the Extent of Ill-Structured Problem Solving Process among Pre-Service Teachers in an Asynchronous Online Discussion and Reflection Log Learning Environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research 30(3), 197–227 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harris, N., Sandor, M.: Developing online discussion forums as student centred peer e-learning environments. In: ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007, pp. 383–387 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dennen, V.P.: From message posting to learning dialogues; Factors affecting learner participation in asynchronous discussion. Distance Education 26(1), 127–148 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hillman, D.C., Willis, D.J., Gunawardena, C.N.: Learner interface interaction in distance education; an extension of contemporary models and strategies for practitioners. American Journal of Distance Education 8(2), 30–42 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, H., Kim, J.W., Hackney, R.: Knowledge hoarding and user acceptance of online discussion board systems in eLearning: A case study. Computers in Human Behavior 27, 1431–1437 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nokelainen, P.: An empirical assessment of pedagogical usability criteria for digital learning material with elementary school students. Educational Technology & Society 9(2), 178–197 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Picciano, A.G.: Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous learning networks 6(1), 21–40 (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pirolli, P., Card, S.K.: Information foraging (1999), http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/papers/280/uir-1999-05-pirolli.pdf (retrieved March 28, 2013)
  12. 12.
    Trepess, D.: Information Foraging Theory (2006), http://www.interactiondesign.org/encyclopedia/information_foraging_theory.html (retrieved March 28, 2013)
  13. 13.
    Silius, K., Tervakari, A.M., Pohjolainen, S.: A multidisciplinary tool for the evaluation of usability, pedagogical usability, accessibility and informational quality of web-based courses. In: The Eleventh International PEG Conference: Powerful ICT for Teaching and Learning, vol. 28 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanfei Ma
    • 1
  • Cathryn Friel
    • 1
  • Wanli Xing
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Information Science and Learning TechnologiesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations