Mobile Learning Achievement from the Perspective of Self-efficacy: A Case Study of Basic Computer Concepts Course

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 297)

Abstract

The major purpose of the research is to analyze the effect of mobile learning course in BCC on self-efficacy of student regarding learning achievement. The research utilizes cross-sectional research design and uses structural questions as research tool for data gathering. Statistical methods included descriptive statistics, t-test, Pearson Correlation coefficient. The results obtained two conclusions, from such a results, this paper suggests a further research on the self-efficacy, mobile learning, and learning achievement.

Keywords

learning achievement mobile learning self-efficacy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cheng, T.-F., Wu, H.-C.: A study of the Relationships in Clerk’s Self-efficacy, Organizational Commitment, and Job Satisfaction in Different Types of Paternalistic Leadership: An Application of Structural Equation Modeling. Journal of Education and Psychology 29(1), 47–75 (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, Z.-P.: A Study of Improving the Learning Outcomes of Ceramics Skills with Self-Efficacy Strategy. Art Journal 83, 37–57 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karaguven, M.H., Yukseloglu, S.M.: Vocational Self-efficacy and Academic Motivation Levels of Technical and Vocational Pre-service Teachers (Example of Marmara University). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 106, 3366–3374 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karnell, A.P., Cupp, P.K., Zimmerman, R.S., Feist-Price, S., Bennie, T.: Efficacy of an american alcohol and hiv prevention curriculum adapted for use in south africa: Results of a pilot study in five township schools. AIDS Education and Prevention 18(4), 295–310 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lent, R.W., Lopez, F.G., Bieschke, K.J.: Predicting mathematics related choice and success behaviors: Test of an expanded social cognitive model. Journal of Vocational Behavior 42(2), 223–236 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, J.-T., Wang, Y.-C., Li, T.-C.: A Study of the Relationship of Employee Self-Efficacy, Learning Strategy, and E-Learning Effectiveness. K.U.A.S. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences 6(2), 119–142 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Irwan, I.M., Norazah, M.N., Ridzwan, C.R., Rosseni, D.: The Acceptance of AutoCAD Student for Polytechnic on Mobile Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 102(22), 169–176 (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahmad Rizal, M., Yahya, B.: The Effect of Courseware Utilization to the Student’s Achievement for Field Independencedependence Cognitive Styles Student. Journal of Technical, Vocational & Engineering Education 4, 12–21 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    McEwan, T., Cairncross, S.: Evaluation and multimedia learning objects: towards a human-centred approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education 1(2), 101–112 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sharples, M.: Big issues in mobile learning. Report of a workshop by the Kaleidoscope Network of Excellence Mobile Learning Initiative. University of Nottingham, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Göksu, İ., Atici, B.: Need for Mobile Learning: Technologies and Opportunities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 103(26), 685–694 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yildirim, S., Goktas, Y., Temur, N., Kocaman, A.: A Checklist for a Good Learning Management System (LMS). Turk Egitim Bilimleri Dergisi 4(2) (2004) (in Turkish), http://www.tebd.gazi.edu.tr/arsiv/2004_cilt2/sayi_4/455-462.pdf
  14. 14.
    Kici, D.: A Study on the Effects of expectations for Mobile Learning University Education of University Students. In: International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications (ICONTE), Antalya-Turkey, November 11-13 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-L., Yan, C.-F.: The Influence of Perceived Convenience and Curiosity on Continuous English Learning Intention in Mobile Environment. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences 48(4), 571–588 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reishehrei, A.P., Reishehrei, A.P., Soleimani, E.: A Comparison Study of Self Concept and Self Efficacy in Martial Arts and non Martial Arts Athletics in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 116, 5025–5029 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bandura, A.: Social cognitive theory of self- regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50, 248–287 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dykes, G., Knight, H.: Mobile learning for teachers in Europe. Exploring the potential of mobile technologies to support teachers and improve practices. UNESCO Working Paper Series on Mobile Learning, France (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Oberer, B., Erkollar, A.: Mobile Learning in Higher Education: A Marketing Course Design Project in Austria. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 93, 2125–2129 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Li, L., Leina, L.: Designing Principles of Mobile Learning in ESP Course for Chinese Students. IERI Procedia 2, 142–148 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuh-Ming Cheng
    • 1
  • Sheng-Huang Kuo
    • 1
  • E-Liang Cheng
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer Science and Information EngineeringShu Te UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan

Personalised recommendations