Advertisement

Enhancing Interdisciplinary Cooperation by Social Platforms

Assessing the Usefulness of Bibliometric Social Network Visualization in Large-Scale Research Clusters
  • André Calero Valdez
  • Anne Kathrin Schaar
  • Martina Ziefle
  • Andreas Holzinger
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8521)

Abstract

In large-scale research projects active management of the cooperation process is necessary, e.g. to ensure systematic transfer of knowledge, alignment of research goals, or appropriate dissemination of research efforts. In a large scale research-cluster at the RWTH Aachen University a cybernetic management approach is applied. As a planned measure, publishing efforts (i.e. bibliometric data) will be visualized on a social software platform accessible by researchers and the steering committee. But do researchers agree with the chosen style of visualization of their publications? As part of a user centered design, this paper presents the results of an interview study with researchers (n=22) addressing the usefulness and applicability of this approach. As central findings arguments for using the publication visualization are identified such as enabling retrospective analysis, acquiring new information about the team, improvement in dissemination planning, but at the same time contrasted by arguments against this approach, such as missing information, a possibly negative influence on workflow of researchers, and the bad legibility of the visualization. Additionally requirements and suggested improvements are presented.

Keywords

Data visualization technology acceptance bibliometrics user centred-design information systems 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nissani, M.: Ten cheers for interdisciplinarity: The case for interdisciplinary knowledge and research. The Social Science Journal 34(2), 201–216 (1997)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Repko, A.F.: Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Sage (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jooß, C., Welter, F., Leisten, I., Richert, A., Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Nick, E., Prahl, U., Jansen, U., Schulz, W., et al.: Scientific cooperation engineering in the cluster of excellence integrative production technology for high-wage countries at RWTH Aachen University. In: Proceedings of the ICERI 2012, pp. 3842–3846 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schuh, G., Aghassi, S., Caler Valdez, A.: Supporting technology transfer via web-based platforms. In: Proceedings of PICMET 2013 Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services (PICMET), pp. 858–866. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Garfield, E.: Citation indexes for science. a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology 35(5), 1123–1127 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harzing, A.W., Van der Wal, R.: Google scholar: the democratization of citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8(1), 61–73 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nisonger, T.E.: Citation autobiography: An investigation of isi database coverage in determining author citedness. College & Research Libraries 65(2), 152–163 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hicks, D.: The difficulty of achieving full coverage of international social science literature and the bibliometric consequences. Scientometrics 44(2), 193–215 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Leydesdorff, L., Shin, J.C.: How to evaluate universities in terms of their relative citation impacts: Fractional counting of citations and the normalization of differences among disciplines. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 62(6), 1146–1155 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Delgado López-Cózar, E., Robinson-García, N., Torres-Salinas, D.: Manipulating google scholar citations and google scholar metrics: simple, easy and tempting (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calero-Medina, C., Noyons, E.: Combining mapping and citation network analysis for a better understanding of the scientific development: The case of the absorptive capacity field. Journal of Informetrics 2(4), 272–279 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holzinger, A., Ofner, B., Stocker, C., Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Dehmer, M.: On graph entropy measures for knowledge discovery from publication network data. In: Cuzzocrea, A., Kittl, C., Simos, D.E., Weippl, E., Xu, L. (eds.) CD-ARES 2013. LNCS, vol. 8127, pp. 354–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Calero Valdez, A., Schaar, A.K., Ziefle, M., Holzinger, A., Jeschke, S., Brecher, C.: Using mixed node publication network graphs for analyzing success in interdisciplinary teams. In: Huang, R., Ghorbani, A.A., Pasi, G., Yamaguchi, T., Yen, N.Y., Jin, B. (eds.) AMT 2012. LNCS, vol. 7669, pp. 606–617. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bastian, M., Heymann, S., Jacomy, M.: Gephi: An open source software for exploring and manipulating networks (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M.: Publication network visualization as an approach for interdisciplinary innovation management. In: 2013 IEEE International Professional Communication Conference (IPCC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L.: The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Transaction Books (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Redner, S.: How popular is your paper? an empirical study of the citation distribution. The European Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Complex Systems 4(2), 131–134 (1998)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schaar, A.K., Calero Valdez, A., Ziefle, M.: The impact of user diversity on the willingness to disclose personal information in social network services. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds.) SouthCHI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7946, pp. 174–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Calero Valdez, A., Kathrin Schaar, A., Ziefle, M.: Personality influences on etiquette requirements for social media in the work context. In: Holzinger, A., Ziefle, M., Hitz, M., Debevc, M. (eds.) SouthCHI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7946, pp. 427–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Calero Valdez
    • 1
  • Anne Kathrin Schaar
    • 1
  • Martina Ziefle
    • 1
  • Andreas Holzinger
    • 2
  1. 1.Human-Computer Interaction CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany
  2. 2.Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and DocumentationMedical University GrazAustria

Personalised recommendations