Advertisement

Building a Telemedicine Framework to Improve the Interactions between Cancer Patients and Oncology Triage Nurses

  • Saif Khairat
  • Venkatesh Rudrapatna
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8529)

Abstract

As healthcare becomes more complex and data driven, the need and use of telemedicine continues to grow. Cancer patients require substantial amount of assistance and guidance through the chemotherapy process. The traditional telephone interaction between patients and providers shows major limitations such as inaccurate assessments and patient dissatisfaction. For that reason, his paper investigates a novel informatics intervention, which is the utilization of telemedicine to improve patient-provider interaction through videoconferencing technologies. The anticipated outcomes include higher accuracy in triage nursing decisions, higher patient and provider satisfaction rates. The ultimate goal of this research is to provide a study design of a telemedicine framework that aims at improving cancer patient management.

Keywords

Telemedicine Oncology Cancer Patient Provider Communication Management 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bashshur, R.L.: On the definition and evaluation of telemedicine. Telemed. J. 1, 19–30 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Larsen, M.E., Rowntree, J., Young, A.M., Pearson, S., Smith, J., Gibson, O.J., Weaver, A., Tarassenko, L.: Chemotherapy side-effect management using mobile phones. In: Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. 51, 5–5152 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilson, R., Hubert, J.: Resurfacing the care in nursing by telephone: lessons from ambulatory oncology. Nursing Outlook 50(4), 160–164 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reid, J., Porter, S.: Utility, caller, and patient profile of a novel chemotherapy telephone helpline service within a regional cancer centre in Northern Ireland. Cancer Nursing 32, E27–E32 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Behl, D., Hendrickson, A.W., Moynihan, T.: Oncologic emergencies. Critical Care Clinics 26(1), 181–205 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Flannery, M., Phillips, S.M., Lyons, C.A.: Examining telephone calls in ambulatory oncology. J. Oncol. Pract. 5, 57–60 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Taylor, P., Goldsmith, P., Murray, K., Harris, D., Barkley, A.: Evaluating a telemedicine system to assist in the management of dermatology referrals. Br. J. Dermatol. 144(2), 33–328 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Martin-Khan, M., Flicker, L., Wootton, R., Loh, P.K., Edwards, H., Varghese, P., Byrne, G.J., Klein, K., Gray, L.: The diagnostic accuracy of telegeriatrics for the diagnosis of dementia via video conferencing. J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc. 13(5), 487.e19–487.e24 (2012)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kruse, R.L., Parker Oliver, D., Wittenberg-Lyles, E., Demiris, G.: Conducting the ACTIVE randomized trial in hospice care: keys to success. Clin. Trials. 10(1), 160–169 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kitamura, C., Zurawel–Balaura, L., Wong, R.K.S.: CurrOncol. 17(3), 17–27 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Reid, J., Porter, S.: Utility, caller, and patient profile of a novel Chemotherapy Telephone Helpline service within a regional cancer centre in Northern Ireland. Cancer Nurs 34(3), E27-32 (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gale, N., Sultan, H.: Telehealth as ’peace of mind’: Embodiment, emotions and the home as the primary health space for people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder. Health Place 21, 140–147 (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Saif Khairat
    • 1
  • Venkatesh Rudrapatna
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Health InformaticsUniversity of MinnesotaUSA

Personalised recommendations